Bonaventure at Keizer Station Costs & Pricing
Bonaventure at Keizer Station offers a range of accommodation options with competitive pricing when compared to both Marion County and the broader state of Oregon. For a one-bedroom unit, residents can expect to pay $3,170, which is notably lower than the county average of $4,001 and slightly more affordable than the state average of $3,904. The two-bedroom apartments are priced at $3,840, which exceeds the county's average rate of $3,417 but still presents a considerable value when compared to Oregon's higher average of $4,436. Meanwhile, studio apartments at Bonaventure are set at $5,550 - significantly above both county and state averages of approximately $3,836 and $3,815 respectively. Overall, Bonaventure at Keizer Station provides an attractive option for those considering assisted living in terms of pricing for one- and two-bedroom units while highlighting how specific needs may affect costs in studio accommodations.
| Floor plans | Bonaventure at Keizer Station | Marion County | Oregon |
|---|
| 1 Bedroom | $3,170 | $4,001 | $3,904 |
| 2 Bedrooms | $3,840 | $3,417 | $4,436 |
| Studio | $5,550 | $3,836 | $3,815 |
Memory care communities with a similar price nearby
-
from +$130 / mo
Harmony House of Salem
$3,300 to $3,550 / month
2.5 miles away
-
from -$255 / mo
Emerald Gardens of Woodburn
$2,915 to $4,160 / month
11.9 miles away
-
from -$170 / mo
Angel's Place II Adult Care Home
$3,000 to $4,000 / month
21.1 miles away
-
from +$330 / mo
Emerald Gardens
$3,500 to $4,200 / month
11.9 miles away
-
from +$265 / mo
The Village at Keizer Ridge
$3,435 to $4,775 / month
0.6 miles away
Overall Review of Bonaventure at Keizer Station
common
28 reviews mention this
Staff are consistently described as caring
Residents and families repeatedly describe the staff as caring and helpful.
A large share of reviews emphasize that staff members treat residents kindly and work hard to meet needs. Families mention good communication with family members and describe staff as supportive when hospice is needed. Some reviews also point to instability and gaps in service at times, but even those complaints often acknowledge that many caregivers are helpful once they respond.
caveat
25 reviews mention this
Food quality and variety draw strong reactions
Dining is a frequent point of frustration, especially around variety and presentation.
Several reviews complain about limited menu options, food quality being inconsistent, and meals arriving coldâparticularly for residents eating in their apartments. Others describe specific preferences and expectations not being met, including complaints about the meal schedule and food presentation. A smaller number of reviews say the food is good or that residents like what theyâre served, suggesting the experience varies by unit and staffing.
caveat
14 reviews mention this
Care response time is sometimes questioned
Some residents and families report delays when help is needed.
While many reviews praise the caregivers, a recurring concern is that response to call-bell requests can be slow, including instances where assistance took a long time. Multiple reviews connect these problems to staffing shortages or turnover, with notes about inconsistent follow-through and uneven personal care. A few reviewers also describe medication management as an area that could improve, reinforcing the theme of service reliability rather than day-to-day friendliness alone.
caveat
18 reviews mention this
Turnover and management changes come up often
Reviews frequently mention staffing and management changes affecting consistency.
Several reviews describe steady turnover among staff and kitchen or serving teams, along with frequent management changes. Some reviewers say this led to confusion, mixed service quality, and difficulty getting issues resolved. Other comments balance this by describing stable key staff members in certain periods, so the pattern is not uniform across every experience, but consistency is a clear theme.
common
20 reviews mention this
Activities and community programming are a highlight
Residents are often pleased with the variety of activities and events.
Many reviews mention ongoing activities such as on-site events, celebrations, and outings, with families describing how programming kept loved ones engaged. Several reviewers cite holiday or themed events and group gatherings, and some mention that it was easy to build relationships through the community. A few caveats note that participation may be limited for certain residents or that activities are not always actively encouraged or attended, particularly in memory care.
caveat
10 reviews mention this
Pricing feels high to many families
Multiple reviews describe the community as very expensive for whatâs provided.
Some families say the overall cost is high and reference value concerns, including examples of price increases after move-in. Others tie the pricing concern to service experience, noting that residents may not receive the full level of care people expect when staffing is short. A small number of reviews express that they chose the community for specific reasons like apartment size and location, but still characterize it as costly.
common
16 reviews mention this
The building and cleanliness stand out
Reviews often describe the facility as clean, well-kept, and nicely appointed.
A recurring theme is that the community looks good, is maintained, and feels clean and well-appointed. Families and visitors mention cleanliness in both common areas and apartments, and a number of reviews highlight the overall appearance and decor. A few reviews contradict this with complaints about housekeeping or maintenance delays, but those appear less common than the positive impressions.
How we summarize
Counts show how many written reviews mention each theme; a review can touch several themes, and only frequently mentioned themes are displayed.