Regent Assisted Living Inc.

Cons

• The reviewer states that the location is not the advertised one.
• The reviewer notes that the interviewer only sought personal information.
• It appears to be a scam, phishing attempt, or social engineering.
• The reviewer advises others to go somewhere else.

Review

A troubling recruitment experience unfolded when a supposed opportunity turned out to be misaligned with reality. At the outset, the individual discovered that the people offering the job were not located at the address that had been provided. The sense of confusion deepened as a follow-up call revealed further discrepancies: the interviewer, rather than offering concrete information about the role, seemed to be steering the conversation toward obtaining personal details. This combination of a wrong location and an off-putting phone interaction created an immediate red flag about the legitimacy of the opportunity.

The pivotal moment came with the phone call. When the caller identified as part of the hiring process, the interviewers presented a narrow and unsettling focus: they wanted personal information rather than details about qualifications, experience, or how the role would function. In the caller's words, the impression was that a crucial part of the interaction was to extract personal data rather than evaluate professional fit. Such a request, especially early in the process, is a classic hallmark of a scam or social engineering attempt, and it left the recipient with a strong sense that something was not right.

The overall impression was that this was more than a routine interview misstep. The experience aligned with common patterns associated with phishing and social engineering: a location that doesn't correspond to the advertised company, a fast-moving request for sensitive information, and a lack of transparent, verifiable details about the employer and the role. The phrasing and sequence of events suggested that the aim was not to assess skills in a legitimate manner but to obtain personal data under the guise of a recruitment process. The phrase, "Seems like a scam, phishing, social engineering, etc." captured the blunt assessment that many readers would expect when faced with such mixed signals and ambiguous assurances.

What makes this situation particularly alarming is the combination of physical and digital red flags. A person can be lured by the appeal of an opportunity, but when the address does not match the company's official footprint and the first substantive contact is an unsolicited request for private information, the odds of a legitimate outcome diminish rapidly. The impression of urgency or pressure to continue the process, coupled with vague assurances about the role, can push someone to overlook critical inconsistencies in order to avoid missing a potential chance. In a legitimate hiring scenario, the path would typically involve clear, verifiable details about the company, a professional recruitment process, and a progressive exchange of information that safeguards personal data.

From a practical standpoint, several warning signs emerge that can guide future decisions. Legitimate employers usually provide verifiable contact details, offer interviews at a real office or through clearly identifiable virtual channels, and refrain from demanding sensitive information at the early stage. If a recruiter cannot share a precise office location, or if the communication relies on an untraceable phone number or a third-party intermediary with limited accountability, that should prompt a pause for verification. A credible process would involve a formal email from a corporate domain, scheduling through official channels, and a transparent outline of what the next steps are - without pressuring the candidate to disclose personal data such as social security numbers, bank details, or passwords.

Moving forward, the recommended course of action is cautious and proactive. When confronted with the situation described, it is prudent to avoid sharing personal information and to seek confirmation through independent channels. This can include looking up the company's official website, cross-checking the listed address against public records, and contacting the company through the phone numbers or email addresses published on their official site. If the opportunity seems legitimate but the process feels off, it's reasonable to ask for more information - such as the recruiter's name, a corporate email address, and the official interview schedule - before proceeding. Ending the conversation politely and declining to provide sensitive information is a sensible protective measure.

Beyond personal precaution, there is value in broader vigilance. It's worthwhile to reflect on what makes a recruitment process trustworthy: a demonstrable corporate presence, clear and verifiable communication, and a process that respects a candidate's boundaries regarding personal data. Sharing experiences with others can help prevent future encounters with scams or social engineering attempts. Platforms that host job listings or reviews can be valuable avenues for reporting suspicious activity, aiding others who might encounter the same tactics. Documenting dates, names, and the exact wording of what was requested can be crucial for any reports or follow-up with consumer protection agencies.

Ultimately, the experience described serves as a cautionary tale about the evolving nature of job scams. When the signs are misaligned - an unavailable location, an interviewer who focuses on personal information early in the process, and a clear impression of phishing or social engineering - it is wise to treat the situation as suspicious and to err on the side of caution. The takeaway is not only to protect one's own information but to help others recognize and avoid similar maneuvers. By staying skeptical of discrepancies, verifying through official channels, and reporting dubious outreach, job seekers can navigate the landscape more safely and reduce the likelihood of falling prey to unscrupulous actors.

This part of Portland, Oregon offers a diverse range of amenities suitable for senior living. With multiple theaters such as Regal Pioneer Place and the Hollywood Theatre, entertainment options are plentiful. Nearby parks like Governor Tom McCall Waterfront Park and Alberta Park provide opportunities for outdoor activities and relaxation. Access to pharmacies like Rite Aid and CVS Pharmacy ensure convenient healthcare services. A variety of restaurants, cafes, and transportation options are also easily accessible in this area. Additionally, proximity to hospitals such as Shriners Hospitals For Children and Legacy Good Samaritan Medical Center ensures quality healthcare facilities nearby. Overall, this neighborhood provides a balanced mix of entertainment, healthcare, dining options, and outdoor spaces suitable for senior residents looking to enjoy all that Portland has to offer.

Theaters

• Regal Pioneer Place (0.1 miles)
• Hollywood Theatre (2.8 miles)

Parks

• Governor Tom McCall Waterfront Park (0.2 miles)
• Alberta Park (0.4 miles)
• Colonel Summers Park (1.3 miles)
• Washington Park (1.3 miles)
• Terwilliger Playground (1.9 miles)
• Oregon Park (2 miles)
• Irving Park (2.1 miles)

Pharmacies

• Rite Aid (0.3 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (0.6 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (0.6 miles)
• Rite Aid (0.7 miles)
• Safeway Pharmacy (1 miles)
• Fred Meyer Pharmacy (1 miles)
• Walgreens (1.1 miles)

Restaurants

• Momo's (0.4 miles)
• Produce Row Cafe (0.5 miles)
• Toki PDX (0.5 miles)
• Wayfinder Beer (0.5 miles)
• Jake's Famous Crawfish (0.5 miles)
• Deschutes Brewery Portland Public House (0.6 miles)
• Teardrop Lounge (0.6 miles)

Cafes

• Coava Coffee Roasters (0.7 miles)
• King's Hookah Lounge (0.8 miles)
• Dutch Bros Coffee (0.8 miles)
• Starbucks (1.2 miles)
• Peet's Coffee and Tea (1.6 miles)
• Dutch Bros Coffee (2.5 miles)
• Portland Cà Phê (2.6 miles)

Transportation

• Amtrak (0.8 miles)
• TriMet Hollywood/NE 42nd Ave Transit Center (2.8 miles)

Hospitals

• Shriners Hospitals For Children (1.3 miles)
• Legacy Good Samaritan Medical Center (1.4 miles)
• Doernbecher Children's Hospital (1.5 miles)
• Portland VA Medical Center (1.5 miles)
• Legacy Emanuel Childrens Hospital (1.7 miles)
• Randall Children's Hospital (1.8 miles)
• Legacy Emanuel Burn Center (1.9 miles)

Physicians

• Good Samaritan Building 1 (1.4 miles)
• Legacy Medical Group (1.6 miles)
• Legacy Medical Group-Emanuel (1.8 miles)
• To Summy Od Myoptic Optometry Dr Summy To Optometrist Portland (2.4 miles)
• Family Medical Group, PC (2.6 miles)
• Richmond Family Health Center (2.7 miles)
• ZoomCare (3.4 miles)

Places of Worship

• St Rose Catholic Church (3.6 miles)