The Oaks at Lebanon Costs & Pricing
The Oaks at Lebanon offers competitive pricing for senior living accommodations compared to both Linn County and the broader Oregon state averages. For a studio, residents can expect to pay $3,040 per month, which is notably lower than the county average of $4,387 and also below the state average of $3,815. One-bedroom units at The Oaks are available for $3,535, again providing a more economical option compared to Linn County's average of $4,090 and Oregon's average of $3,904. Finally, for those needing more space, the two-bedroom options are priced at $4,345 per month - this is less than the county's average of $4,887 and slightly above the state's average of $4,436. Overall, The Oaks at Lebanon positions itself as an affordable choice for seniors seeking quality living in a supportive environment without compromising on their financial well-being.
| Floor plans | The Oaks at Lebanon | Linn County | Oregon |
|---|
| Studio | $3,040 | $4,387 | $3,815 |
| 1 Bedroom | $3,535 | $4,090 | $3,904 |
| 2 Bedrooms | $4,345 | $4,887 | $4,436 |
Assisted Living communities with a similar price nearby
-
from +$335 / mo
Brookdale Grand Prairie
$3,375 to $4,175 / month
9.8 miles away
-
About the same
Willamette Manor
$2,960 to $3,208 / month
0.4 miles away
-
from +$160 / mo
Waverly Place
$3,200 to $4,000 / month
10.6 miles away
-
About the same
Conifer House
$3,095 to $4,841 / month
16.9 miles away
-
About the same
Cascades of Stayton
$3,040 to $5,290 / month
20.0 miles away
Overall Review of The Oaks at Lebanon
common
28 reviews mention this
Caring, attentive staff stands out
Residents’ families repeatedly describe staff as caring, helpful, and responsive.
Across many reviews, families say the staff is caring and easy to work with, and that day-to-day interactions put them at ease. Several reviewers mention staff knowing residents by name, talking with them in the halls, and being thoughtful and accommodating. A few reviews also describe follow-through issues, but the most repeated theme is consistently kind, attentive support.
common
12 reviews mention this
Food is frequently praised
Meals and food quality are a common positive point in reviews.
Many reviewers mention good meals, “great food,” or that residents enjoy eating. A couple of reviews specifically call out the chef or the dining experience, and one family describes a visit lunch where the meals seemed good to their loved one. There are also a few mixed comments about food quality and cooking, including requests for better food selection.
common
14 reviews mention this
Planned activities keep residents engaged
Residents and visitors often describe an active schedule and social options.
Reviews frequently highlight scheduled activities and a busy routine, with residents joining in and enjoying themselves. Some reviewers mention specific examples like BINGO, hair appointments, Bible or church-related offerings, and recurring community events. The activity emphasis aligns with the on-site and off-site activity offerings listed for the community.
common
9 reviews mention this
Clean, well-kept environment
Multiple reviews mention the community as clean and well maintained.
Several reviews describe the facility as clean, “really well kept,” and consistently maintained. Families also mention pleasant common spaces and rooms, including positive comments about the overall look and comfort. Even among negative reviews, cleanliness is not the main complaint.
caveat
6 reviews mention this
Care value and timeliness vary
Some reviewers question care timeliness and overall value for cost.
While many reviews are satisfied with care and supervision, a smaller set of reviews raise concerns about the timeliness or quality of individual assistance when needed. One reviewer also describes problems with kitchen/food beyond just preference, tying it to a broader negative experience. Another common note is that the community is expensive, with at least one reviewer weighing whether the value matches what’s offered.
differentiator
7 reviews mention this
Pricing runs below county and state
Pricing is positioned well below county and state levels across unit types.
Pricing is described in reviews as expensive by at least one family member, but the listed price ranges for studios and apartments are still lower than both the county and state benchmarks provided. That means residents comparing cost have a concrete reference point for budgeting across different apartment sizes.
How we summarize
Counts show how many written reviews mention each theme; a review can touch several themes, and only frequently mentioned themes are displayed.