Cedar Center Apartment

Pros

• Apparently the apartments read my review and heeded.
• Just tried to login again and much to my surprise, it went nice and smooth.
• No more captcha!
• That's the power of a printed word.

Cons

• The reviewer states the place is not suitable for Black Americans.
• The reviewer claims the people there are racist and that the environment is racist.
• It was nearly impossible to pass the captcha on the apartment website, and the reviewer was very disappointed.
• The reviewer deducts a star for the non-response to multiple inquiries.
• The reviewer notes that removing the captcha did not improve the situation.
• The reviewer simply describes the place as bad.
• The reviewer asserts there are many racist elderly people among the staff/residents.
• The staff are described as racist toward the reviewer.
• A staff member opened the dryer to check for Clara's clothes and did not restart it.
• Eight people inquired why the reviewer was in the laundry room, which the reviewer found intrusive.

Review

The collection of remarks about this apartment complex is framed by a troubling and recurring thread: a perception that racism and racial bias color everyday life there. One reviewer opens with a blunt warning, expressing heartbreak that the place "is not a place for black Americans." The sentiment is hard and personal - despair that people will judge others by the color of their skin rather than by character or behavior. The writer speaks of learning to "get along with one another" and laments that this is not simply a matter of bad customer service but a deeper, systemic strain. There's a sense of urgency and warning: the reviewer asks others to listen to these experiences and to understand that they would rather not bring their family to a place that they feel is hostile or unwelcoming. This voice is saturated with disappointment and a plea for change, even invoking God as a force larger than individual effort to alter people's prejudices.

In a later update that reads like a continuation of the same narrative, the reviewer recounts a shift four years after the initial impression. The earlier complaint centered on a captcha barrier on the apartments' website, which made it nearly impossible to log in and engage with the property manager or submit inquiries. In this revised account, the reviewer notes that the captcha problem has been resolved: logging in now goes smoothly, and the reviewer attributes this improvement to the "power of a printed word" - a wry nod to the impact that one written review can have on management's behavior. Yet the calm update is tempered by a practical critique: despite the improved login experience, the reviewer subtracts a star for the ongoing lack of responsiveness to multiple inquiries. The overall takeaway is that a visible public critique can prompt change, but it does not erase underlying service issues.

A separate section of the reviews arrives under the heading "Bad," and it escalates into a direct confrontation with perceived bias among the staff. The writer proclaims, in a vehement and personal tone, that they have "never seen so many Racist Elderly people in my African American life." The anecdote pivots to a specific incident in the laundry room: Clara, presumably a staff member, leaves and another attendant takes over. The new staff member tells the reviewer that she is there to ensure that the reviewer doesn't steal Clara's clothes. The sequence unfolds as the attendant opens a dryer to verify that all of Clara's items are present, then closes the door without restarting the dryer. The reviewer suggests that such intrusive scrutiny - driven by suspicion and bias rather than a genuine concern for security - would have led to a different action had racism not been involved. The scene is described as crowded with staff from "eight people" who gather to question the reviewer's presence, highlighting a culture of excessive oversight perceived as hostile or discriminatory.

The emotional texture of the laundry-room encounter intensifies the sense that prejudice is not merely an abstract accusation but a lived, daily friction. The reviewer's language is emphatic and accusatory: the presence of "racist elderly people" is not just a misstep in customer service but a defining trait of the community they encountered in the building. The laundry episode is framed as evidence of a broader pattern - the assumption of wrongdoing based on race, the rush to police behavior, and the uncomfortable feeling that one is always under scrutiny in spaces that should be routine and mundane. The intensity of the moment underscores a broader fear of being misjudged or treated as a suspect rather than a resident or guest.

In their closing stance, the author signals a resolve to take action beyond the immediate incidents. The plan to contact the person who runs corporate and the wider set of buildings under the same management signals a belief that these experiences are not isolated but systemic. The reviewer's intent to escalate suggests a trust in corporate oversight as a corrective mechanism for the kinds of discriminatory attitudes and practices they fear they encountered. The call to action is explicit: report, document, and seek accountability from the upper levels of management, with the hope that such conversations can drive substantive change across the organization.

Taken together, the threads of these reviews reveal a complex picture of a property that has sparked both technological friction and human friction in equal measure. The captcha issue on the website became a catalyst for a broader critique of responsiveness and service quality, showing that even small technical barriers can become a symbol of a larger failure to engage with residents effectively. At the same time, the accounts of overt racial bias - whether claimed to come from elderly staff in the laundry room or from the day-to-day dynamics of security and oversight - paint a portrait of a place where race and suspicion are perceived as everyday hazards. The reviewers' voices are heavy with emotion: disappointment, fear, frustration, and a stubborn insistence on accountability.

For prospective residents, these narratives offer a cautionary lens on what life could feel like in this community. The experienced tension between a seemingly improved login process and persistent concerns about how staff treat Black residents or visitors suggests that improvements in one domain do not automatically translate into fair and respectful treatment across the board. The writers' insistence on speaking out - and on pursuing corporate recourse - reflects a belief that advocacy and external accountability are necessary to address the harms they describe. Their messages combine a plea for safety and dignity with a demand for systemic change, underscoring that a place's reputational health rests not only on how well its website works but on whether every resident is treated with fairness and respect.

This area of Cleveland, Ohio offers a convenient and accessible location with a variety of amenities nearby. With several pharmacies, restaurants, cafes, physicians' offices, places of worship, parks, hospitals, and even a theater within close proximity, seniors living in this area will have easy access to essential services and recreational opportunities. The presence of reputable healthcare facilities such as University Hospitals Ahuja Medical Center and the Cleveland Clinic ensures quality medical care for residents. Additionally, the diverse dining options cater to various preferences, while the nearby parks provide opportunities for outdoor activities and relaxation. Overall, this part of Cleveland provides a well-rounded environment that may be appealing for senior living.

Pharmacies

• Walgreens (0.2 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (0.3 miles)
• Walmart Pharmacy (0.8 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (0.9 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (1.5 miles)
• Marc's Stores (1.6 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (1.7 miles)

Restaurants

• McDonald's (0.2 miles)
• Burger King (1.4 miles)
• The Cheesecake Factory (1.6 miles)
• Taco Bell (1.6 miles)
• Boss Dog Brewing Co. (1.7 miles)
• New Heights Grill (1.7 miles)
• bd's Mongolian Grill (2.6 miles)

Cafes

• Starbucks (0.3 miles)
• Starbucks (2.5 miles)
• Starbucks (5 miles)

Physicians

• Senders Pediatrics (0.7 miles)
• University Suburban Health Center (1.3 miles)
• Cleveland Clinic Severance Medical Arts (1.4 miles)
• Rapid Medical Research (3.3 miles)
• UH Rainbow Pediatricenter (3.7 miles)
• Cleveland Clinic - Taussig Cancer Center (4.4 miles)
• Cleveland Clinic - Cole Eye Institute (4.4 miles)

Places of Worship

• South Euclid United Church of Christ (2.5 miles)
• Messiah Luth Church of Lyndhurst (2.5 miles)
• St Clare's Church (3.3 miles)
• Temple Israel Ner Tamid (3.6 miles)

Parks

• Coventry PEACE Park (2.5 miles)
• Anderson Field (2.8 miles)
• Desan Park (3.7 miles)
• Oakville Road Park (3.8 miles)
• Whiteford Park (5.6 miles)

Hospitals

• University Hospitals Ahuja Medical Center (3.8 miles)
• Cleveland Clinic Children's Hospital Rehabilitation Center (4.1 miles)
• Cleveland Clinic - W.O. Walker Center (4.3 miles)
• Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center (4.3 miles)
• Hillcrest Labor And Delivery (5.2 miles)

Theaters

• Silverspot Cinema (3.9 miles)