Forget Me Not Group Home

Pros

• They take really good care of their residents.
• They earned five stars.
• The review suggests strong satisfaction with the facility.

Cons

• The staff singled out the four 18-year-old females and slapped them around.
• They haven't heard a peep from her in six years.

Review

Two accounts converge in a way that makes the emotional texture of the place feel stark and complicated. On one hand, there is a painfully vivid memory of a moment of danger and humiliation, described by someone who states they were there at 18, along with three other 18-year-old females. They say they were singled out and "smacked around," a phrase that carries urgency, fear, and a sense of abrupt harm. The language is concrete and distressing, suggesting an experience that was not only uncomfortable but physically or emotionally abusive. The way the incident is framed - being singled out among a small group of peers - implies a targeted, personal moment rather than an impersonal mishap. The tone conveys shock and anger, an attempt to bear witness to something that should never happen to young visitors or any guest in a place that is supposed to be safe.

That single incident is balanced, in the speaker's mind, by a very different kind of narrative about the same place. The second voice belongs to someone reflecting on a longer relationship: "My mom has lived there for the last six years." The writer notes a lack of communication - "Haven't heard a peep from her" - and uses that absence to imply something about the management and the care regime. The inference drawn is that if a loved one has resided there for six years and there has been little contact, the facility must be maintaining a high standard of care; the conclusion is confident enough to be stated as a general judgment: "They must take really good care of their residents." The line ends with a confident rating: "Five stars." In this telling, the sheer duration of a family member's residence and the absence of alarming messages become a proxy for quality, a reliance on silence as a sign of satisfaction rather than evidence of ongoing care.

The tension between these two statements creates a perplexing portrait. One account describes a moment of overt aggression that would undermine any trust in the safety and respect afforded to visitors or residents. The other asserts a long-standing, peaceful routine of care, with a high rating attached, based on a person's steady residence and the absence of critical feedback. The juxtaposition prompts questions about reliability, context, and perspective. Could the safety lapse described in the first note be an isolated incident, perhaps unrelated to the general behavior of staff? Could the second note reflect a different experience, perhaps tied to a specific floor, shift, or amenable staff member? Or is the discrepancy indicative of broader concerns about how care facilities are evaluated, remembered, and communicated within families?

What emerges, therefore, is a broader caution about reading care-quality signals in isolation. An incident of abuse or mistreatment is not something easily reconciled with a simple five-star rating or with the quiet reassurance of a long-term resident's family member. Both kinds of data points matter: explicit complaints or reports of harm, and the more subtle indicators of ongoing well-being, communication patterns, and consistency of care. A high rating coupled with a lack of visible oversight can mislead, just as a single traumatic event can, on its own, cast a long shadow over an entire organization if not followed by transparent accountability and corrective action. In other words, both voices deserve careful attention and corroboration through independent sources.

If someone is evaluating a place like this, the experience described should prompt several prudent steps. First, seek out verifiable information from official sources: state licensing records, inspection reports, and incident logs that are accessible to the public. Second, talk directly with staff about safety policies, incident reporting, and how they address complaints, grievances, or any signs of abuse. Third, try to connect with current residents or family members who are willing to share balanced perspectives, not just impressions. Fourth, observe daily routines and interactions - how staff respond to residents, how much attention is given to each person, and whether there is an atmosphere of respect and safety. Finally, if there is any immediate danger or evidence of abuse, contact the appropriate authorities or protective services without delay.

Taken together, these two passages reveal how experiences within the same place can diverge dramatically. One account insists on the gravity of an abuse-like incident, demanding accountability and redress. The other asserts long-term satisfaction and care, anchored by the absence of alarming communications and reinforced by a five-star rating. This juxtaposition does not resolve the truth of the facility's performance on its own; instead, it underscores the need for thorough, multi-faceted verification. The ultimate takeaway is not a verdict about any single institution, but a reminder that safety, dignity, and quality of life in care settings require careful scrutiny from multiple angles, especially when individual experiences diverge so markedly.

This part of Canton, Ohio is a diverse and convenient area for senior living. With a variety of pharmacies nearby such as Medtime Pharmacy and Walgreens, access to healthcare and medication is easily accessible. There are also several reputable physicians in close proximity, including Phoenix Rising and Stark Primary Care. For dining options, there are familiar chains like McDonald's and local favorites like Taggarts Ice Cream Parlor. Places of worship such as St Haralambos Greek Orthodox Church provide spiritual support within the community. Additionally, hospitals like Aultman Hospital and Summa Health System are within a short distance for any medical needs. Parks such as Martindale Park and Arboretum Park offer green spaces for leisurely walks or outdoor activities. Overall, this neighborhood offers a blend of amenities that cater to the needs of seniors looking for a comfortable and convenient living environment in Canton.

Pharmacies

• Medtime Pharmacy (0.5 miles)
• Walgreens (0.6 miles)
• Prescription Assistance Network (1.4 miles)
• Good Neighbor Pharmacy (1.8 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (1.8 miles)
• Marc's Stores (1.9 miles)
• Davies Pharmacy (2.3 miles)

Physicians

• Phoenix Rising (0.6 miles)
• N Community Dialysis Units (1.6 miles)
• Canton Neonatology (1.7 miles)
• Cisneros Gerardo MD (1.7 miles)
• Stark Primary Care (1.8 miles)
• Spectrum Orthopedics (2.1 miles)
• Canton Ophthalmology Associates (2.1 miles)

Restaurants

• McDonald's (0.8 miles)
• Conestoga Grill (0.8 miles)
• Little Caesars Pizza (1.1 miles)
• Taggarts Ice Cream Parlor (1.2 miles)
• McDonald's (1.6 miles)
• Nathan's Patio Bar & Grill (1.6 miles)
• Jasmine Asian Bistro (1.9 miles)

Places of Worship

• St Haralambos Greek Orthodox Church (1.2 miles)
• First Baptist Church Of Canton (3.7 miles)
• Grace United Methodist Church (4.1 miles)

Hospitals

• Select Specialty Hospital-Northeast Ohio (1.6 miles)
• Select Speciality Hospital (1.7 miles)
• Case Manager At Mansard Med (2.1 miles)
• Aultman Hospital (2.2 miles)
• Summa Health System (3.8 miles)

Cafes

• Starbucks (2.3 miles)
• Starbucks (4.7 miles)

Parks

• Martindale Park (2.5 miles)
• Arboretum Park (3.2 miles)
• Schneider Community Park (4.1 miles)
• East Canton Village Park (4.2 miles)
• Bors Field (4.2 miles)