1685 Canal Road, Pembroke, NC 28372
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Dial's Family Care Home 2 Costs & Pricing
Dial's Family Care Home 2 presents a unique pricing structure for its accommodation options that reflects both local and state market dynamics. The monthly cost for a semi-private room is set at $5,150, which is significantly higher than the average rates in Robeson County at $3,123 and in North Carolina at $3,584. For those seeking more privacy, the private rooms come with a cost of $6,180 - slightly below the county average of $6,450 but substantially above the state average of $4,425. Lastly, studio accommodations are priced at $6,695, markedly higher than the regional average of $3,768 and the state average of $4,020. These figures indicate that while Dial's Family Care Home 2 offers various living arrangements catering to different preferences, its pricing stands out as notably higher compared to both local and statewide competitors.
| Floor plans | Dial's Family Care Home 2 | Robeson County | North Carolina |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $5,150 | $3,123 | $3,584 |
| Private | $6,180 | $6,450 | $4,425 |
| Studio | $6,695 | $3,768 | $4,020 |
Overall Review of Dial's Family Care Home 2
Pros
The reviewer highlights a unique twist to assisted living with individualized personal care.
The care model focuses on personal attention rather than a single large facility.
The approach is described as person-centered and tailored to each resident.
The concept of individualized care is presented as a positive alternative within assisted living.
Cons
The buildings are not fit for the elderly.
The owners should be shut down.
The staff tell lies about residents.
The staff do not take care of residents.
There is constant arguing among staff.
The caregivers have mental issues.
Review
Dial's Family Care Home 2 in Pembroke, NC is best suited for families pursuing a highly intimate, home-like care arrangement where an elderly loved one can receive focused, one-on-one attention rather than the services of a large, institutional setting. In this model, care is delivered in a smaller, personal environment, and residents often experience closer, more direct interaction with caregivers. That can be a genuine advantage for seniors who thrive on routine, personal connections, and a sense of being known as an individual. Yet this comes with an implicit warning: the same small footprint that enables personal attention can also amplify concerns about safety, oversight, and consistency in care.
Those who should seriously consider alternatives are families prioritizing safety, reliability, and professional governance over a homey feel. If a senior requires robust safety features, strong emergency response systems, or highly standardized protocols, a larger, more regulated assisted living community is likely a better fit. Options with transparent licensing histories, active state inspections, and clearly documented staff qualifications typically offer greater assurances about consistent caregiving, maintenance, and resident rights. In short, when predictable operations and formal accountability matter most, look beyond a small home setting.
The most notable positives here revolve around individualized care in a compact setting. The “unique twist†of one-person-at-a-time, personal attention can translate into tighter supervision, quicker responsiveness, and a sense of belonging that is harder to achieve in bigger facilities. For residents who respond well to familiar routines and caregivers who know their preferences, this arrangement can feel comforting and less impersonal than a large campus. However, these advantages are quickly undermined if core infrastructure and trust in administration falter; a small, personal model loses its upside when basic safety, cleanliness, or truthful communication is in doubt.
The main drawbacks, as highlighted by the reviews, center on structural and governance concerns. The buildings are described as not fit for elderly residents, which raises critical questions about accessibility, safety, and ongoing maintenance. Allegations of dishonesty and reliability problems among those responsible for care further complicate the picture, creating a climate where residents and families must weigh daily assurances against potential mismanagement or staff instability. When a care setting signals instability in leadership or integrity, the weight of the risks shifts decisively toward seeking alternatives, unless there are verifiable, dramatic improvements in oversight and facility condition.
From a decision-making standpoint, prospective families should insist on concrete measures before committing. A thorough, on-site assessment is essential, with attention paid to safety features (grab bars, non-slip floors, accessible bathroom setups), emergency call responsiveness, and the physical condition of living spaces. Request detailed, written care plans that specify caregiver-to-resident ratios, shift coverage, medication management practices, and incident reporting. Speak to current residents or families about experiences with honesty, consistency in care, and how promptly issues are addressed. Verify licensing status, recent inspection reports, and a transparent plan for ongoing maintenance and repairs.
In sum, the community is a viable choice for families prioritizing intimate, personal care within a small, home-like setting, provided there is confidence in the management, safety infrastructure, and truthful communication. If these assurances are uncertain, or if safety, reliability, and formal governance take precedence, concrete alternatives should be pursued. Dial's Family Care Home 2 is not a universal solution; it suits a specific niche where the positives of individualized attention can flourish only if the corresponding safeguards are credible and consistently upheld.




How and When Medicaid May Cover Assisted Living Costs
A Detailed Exploration of Assisted Living Medicaid Waivers Across the United States
Comprehensive Residential Support and Assisted Living Solutions for Individuals with Disabilities