240 S Early Station Rd, Ahoskie, NC 27910
To contact a resident: (252) 332-4681
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Pinewood Manor Assisted Living Costs & Pricing
Pinewood Manor Assisted Living offers a competitive pricing structure compared to both Hertford County and the broader North Carolina state averages. For instance, the cost of a semi-private room at Pinewood Manor is $1,750 per month, significantly lower than the county average of $3,317 and the state average of $3,584. Similarly, studio apartments are priced at $2,450 at Pinewood Manor, which is markedly more affordable than Hertford County's average of $3,263 and North Carolina's statewide average of $4,020. The pricing for one-bedroom units mirrors this trend; at Pinewood Manor, residents pay $2,450 per month compared to $3,418 in Hertford County and $4,055 across the state. This pricing advantage positions Pinewood Manor as an attractive option for those seeking quality assisted living services without the hefty price tag typically associated with such facilities.
| Floor plans | Pinewood Manor Assisted Living | Hertford County | North Carolina |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $1,750 | $3,317 | $3,584 |
| Studio | $2,450 | $3,263 | $4,020 |
| 1 Bedroom | $2,450 | $3,418 | $4,055 |
Overall Review of Pinewood Manor Assisted Living
Pros
Under new management that cares, big things are happening here.- Under new management, great things are happening.
- Some staff were nice.
Cons
The management was horrible.- The staff did not call or mail condolences after the reviewer's father died.
Review
Pinewood Manor Assisted Living in Ahoskie, NC is best suited for seniors who want a small-town setting and are willing to give leadership changes time to take root. This community can work well for residents who need straightforward assisted living support and for families that intend to stay actively engaged with care planning and administration. It rewards patience during a period of transition, with the expectation that new leadership will translate into reliable operations, improved communication, and tangible upgrades in daily care, activities, and resident comfort.
Those who should consider alternatives are families that require consistently proven, highly responsive management from day one. The most concrete red flag in the reviews is inconsistent administrative leadership and the potential for slow or imperfect communication, especially in critical moments. For loved ones needing advanced medical supervision, rapid crisis response, or highly specialized dementia care, this facility may not provide the level of assurance or stability some families demand. Prospective residents who prefer an established, unbroken track record of administration might find other options more reassuring.
Key positives center on the shift in leadership and the momentum that some families report as a result. Reviewers consistently point to “new management” and describe real, observable changes that signal better organization and rising competence. Staff members are frequently noted as pleasant and capable in their interactions, and several families perceive that the facility is heading in a more responsive, considerate direction. The presence of multiple five-star ratings amid a mixed overall score suggests a spectrum of experiences, with meaningful gains for some residents and families as leadership reshapes operations.
The main drawbacks remain acute and credible: the most serious concerns focus on how administration previously operated and how crucial communications were handled (or not handled) around sensitive moments, such as the death of a loved one. One reviewer recounted no outreach of condolence despite a family member passing, underscoring a pattern that can erode trust if not corrected. Three one-star experiences emphasize that, while some staff interactions are pleasing, the governing administration did not meet expectations for empathy, responsiveness, or consistency. In practical terms, these issues create a real, tangible risk for families seeking steady reliability.
Viewed against the identified strengths and weaknesses, the pros can offset the main cons only if the new management demonstrates sustained, verifiable progress. The positive reports about leadership-driven improvements, combined with staff kindness, suggest that the trajectory is moving in the right direction. However, this is not a guarantee: a transition period often carries renewed confidence that must be earned through consistent follow-through, transparent communication, and measurable quality improvements over several months. For families, the decision hinges on whether patience is feasible and whether the hoped-for reforms become reliably embedded in daily care.
In practical terms, families weighing Pinewood Manor should prioritize a proactive, on-site assessment rather than a phone inquiry. Request a direct meeting with the administrator and the leadership team, review current care plans, and demand clear timelines for ongoing improvements. Inquire about staff-to-resident ratios, training standards, and the facility’s process for family updates after incidents or changes in care. Speak with current residents and other families about their day-to-day experiences, and observe how staff respond to questions or concerns in real time. If stability and a demonstrable, ongoing commitment to excellence are essential, this facility can still be a viable choice; if unshakeable reliability is the top criterion, stronger, more established options may be prudent.
Assisted Living
Memory Care
Activities off-site
Bath tubs
Beautician on-site
Devotional services off-site
Indoor common areas
Outdoor common areas
Respite or short term stays offered
Wheelchair accessible showers
Diabetic care
Incontinence care
Medication management
Meals provided
Guiding Your Journey: Understanding Power of Attorney for Elderly Parents
22 Remarkable Caregiver Support Groups Available Online and In-Person
Understanding Medicaid Coverage for Assisted Living: A Comprehensive Guide