Park Avenue Home Care

Pros

• They felt very comfortable with the agency's services.
• The service was great and very personal.
• The staff went above and beyond to fit their needs.
• They considered it worth every dollar.

Cons

• The agency is garbage.
• They put a customer's son in danger.
• They are negligent.
• They are deceitful.
• They are greedy individuals.

Review

The set of impressions about this agency presents a strikingly wide spectrum of experiences, suggesting that the dealings with the organization can run from deeply reassuring to alarmingly troubling. On one end, a family memory is colored by fear and disappointment, painting the agency as unreliable and even dangerous. On the opposite end, other clients describe services that feel intimate, dependable, and highly accommodating. Taken together, these voices hint at a complex relationship between clients and the team, where outcomes seem to hinge on factors that may include staff, situations, and expectations.

One reviewer does not mince words. They describe the agency as a "garbage agency" and insist that their child was put in danger by the people who were supposed to be guiding and protecting them. The language is blunt and accusatory: they label the staff as negligent, deceitful, and greedy. The gravity of these claims centers on the perceived risk to a child and a breach of trust, casting a shadow over any positive attributes the agency might claim. This account reads as a stark warning, suggesting that for this family, the experience was defined by jeopardy rather than care.

In stark contrast to that harsh assessment, another reviewer shares a silver-lining sentiment: "I felt very comfortable with their services." This perspective emphasizes reassurance and ease, implying that the agency provided a sense of safety and reliability. The tone suggests clear communication, dependable support, and a feeling that the arrangements were appropriate for their needs. It stands in direct opposition to the accusations of danger and deceit, underscoring how varied personal experiences can be when engaging with a service of this nature.

Similarly, a third voice highlights warmth and attentiveness: "Great service! Very personal. They practically bend backwards to fit your needs. Worth every dollar." This account stresses not just adequacy but a high level of personalized attention and a willingness to go the extra mile. The reviewer's emphasis on personalization and accommodating flexibility points to a service culture that prioritizes customer needs and responsiveness, framing the engagement as a valuable investment and a positive, customer-centric experience.

What emerges from these divergent accounts is a tension between perceived safety and perceived service quality. On one side, there are claims of danger, negligence, deceit, and greed that threaten the fundamental trust anyone places in a service that handles a child's welfare. On the other side, there are impressions of comfort, personal care, and exceptional effort to tailor services to individual needs, framed as a strong return on investment. This juxtaposition can be baffling for prospective clients who try to weigh risk against value.

The overall takeaway is that experiences with this agency appear highly individualized. Factors such as which staff members are involved, the particular services rendered, and the expectations of the families likely shape the outcomes and impressions people take away. The negative account serves as a cautionary note about safety and ethics, while the positive accounts celebrate empathy, accessibility, and tangible dedication. Potential clients would do well to acknowledge both extremes and seek out concrete assurances.

For anyone considering engaging with the agency, a careful, proactive approach is wise. Ask for specific safety protocols, credentials, and references; request a clear outline of services, pricing, and how concerns or complaints are handled; and consider speaking to multiple families who have used the service to gather a broader view. The stories here illustrate that while some experiences feel deeply supportive and worth the cost, others raise serious concerns about safety and integrity. Thorough due diligence can help balance these divergent impressions and guide a more informed decision.

Cafes

• The West (0.5 miles)
• East One Coffee Roasters (2.7 miles)
• Black Stone Roasters (3 miles)

Pharmacies

• Duane Reade (0.5 miles)
• Duane Reade (0.7 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (0.8 miles)
• Duane Reade (1 miles)
• Wegmans (1.2 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (1.4 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (1.5 miles)

Restaurants

• Kimbap Lab (0.5 miles)
• Subway - 334 Grand St (1.7 miles)
• Katz's Deli (1.8 miles)
• Pier 17 (2.3 miles)
• Daily Provisions (2.5 miles)
• Dominique Ansel Bakery (2.6 miles)

Transportation

• MTA Subway - Metropolitan Ave (0.5 miles)
• MTA - Essex St / Delancey St Subway Station (1.7 miles)
• MTA - Dekalb Avenue Subway Station (1.7 miles)
• MTA Subway - High St/Brooklyn Bridge (1.8 miles)
• MTA Subway - Jefferson St (1.9 miles)
• MTA Subway - Jay St/MetroTech (1.9 miles)
• LIRR - Atlantic Terminal (1.9 miles)

Parks

• Domino Park (0.6 miles)
• East River State Park (0.8 miles)
• McCarren Park (0.9 miles)
• Bushwick Inlet Park (1 miles)
• East River Park (1 miles)
• Fort Greene Park (1.5 miles)
• Herbert Von King Park (1.5 miles)

Theaters

• Alamo Drafthouse Downtown Brooklyn (1.8 miles)
• AMC Kips Bay 15 (2.5 miles)
• Alamo Drafthouse Cinema Lower Manhattan (2.6 miles)

Hospitals

• VA Medical Center (2.2 miles)
• Bellevue Hospital Center (2.3 miles)
• NewYork-Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital (3 miles)