3158 Kingspoint Avenue, Las Vegas, NV 89120
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Saint Anne Residential Care
Pros
The place was very clean.- The staff were excellent at communicating with family.
- The facility was good to Tony.
Cons
They neglected her and tried to cover it up.- They stopped feeding her and closed her door.
- The owner and an employee allegedly gave the reviewer's mother a lethal dose of morphine on her last day.
- The reviewers would never forgive themselves for trusting Nathan Adeleson or the people who run the facility.
- The home told one story of how the injuries happened, but another patient gave a different account suggesting he fell.
- The husband deteriorated rapidly: heavily sedated, unable to walk, with one eye closed and bandages on both arms.
- There was no doubt he would have passed away if he had stayed there any longer.
- The reviewers warned others not to take a loved one to this place.
Review
Saint Anne Residential Care in Las Vegas is best suited for families that are prepared to be deeply involved in daily oversight and who prioritize basic cleanliness and clear, proactive communication about care. The facility presents as a place where these metrics can be maintained, but the overall picture is decidedly more complex. Given the reported experiences, this community should not be chosen by those who require consistent medical monitoring, predictable safety standards, or assurances of transparent, accountable caregiving without vigilant advocacy from family members or a trusted advocate.
Those considering alternatives are wise to look for facilities with demonstrably stronger safety records and robust oversight. If a loved one's needs include reliable nursing supervision, prompt responses to health changes, or verifiable procedures for addressing concerns, other communities are likely to deliver more dependable protection and accountability. Facilities with transparent incident reporting, verifiable staffing credentials, and safer tracks of care should be prioritized. In short, Saint Anne should be weighed against options that can offer consistently safer, more transparent care environments.
On the positive side, a review highlighted that the home was very clean and that staff communicated well with families. Cleanliness matters greatly for comfort and infection risk, and good family communication can reduce anxiety and improve coordination of care. These strengths convey that basic daily life at the facility can be orderly and that family members may feel informed about routine happenings. However, these advantages, even when meaningful, do not resolve the more serious red flags raised by other accounts and cannot compensate for deeper concerns about how residents are treated and monitored.
The drawbacks raised in multiple accounts are grave and must be weighed with maximum seriousness. Allegations include neglect leading to rapid health decline, deception about injuries, and extreme, inappropriate sedation that impaired mobility and vitality. One family reports a perceived attempt to conceal neglect and to harm a loved one, including alleged misuse of medications. Another describes conflicting explanations about injuries and a rapid deterioration in health, suggesting inconsistent caregiver accountability. Taken together, these narratives point to a troubling pattern that calls into question immediate safety, appropriate medical response, and ethical care practices.
In balancing pros and cons, the risks associated with care quality and resident safety dominate. Cleanliness and communication matter, but they do not neutralize the risk of neglect, unsafe sedation, or unclear incident handling. Prospective families should demand verifiable evidence of staffing ratios, ongoing medical oversight, access to licensed nursing staff, detailed incident logs, and a transparent mechanism for reporting and addressing concerns. If those assurances cannot be documented before transition, the prudent choice is to look elsewhere. For families pressed to choose quickly, prioritize facilities with demonstrated safety audits, strong supervision, and independent oversight to minimize the possibility of harm.
In the end, Saint Anne Residential Care represents a high-risk option rather than a trusted home for someone in need of steady, safe, and ethically managed care. The facility may appeal to those who can tolerate intense family involvement and who place emphasis on surface-level cleanliness and communication, but the severe allegations and inconsistent narratives make alternatives much more compelling. A careful, evidence-based screening, visits, conversations with current residents and families, review of state inspection records, and a clear plan for escalation, should guide the decision. If not, the better move is to select a residence with a proven commitment to safety, accountability, and compassionate care that stands up to the harshest questions without hesitation.
10 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Cable or satellite TV
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Telephone
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
McCarran International (3 miles away)
24-hour supervision
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
Exploring the Contrasts Between Assisted Living and Skilled Nursing
8 Key Indicators That Suggest It May Be Time to Transition from Assisted Living to Skilled Nursing Care
Vibrant Senior Living: A Comprehensive Guide for Active Older Adults