2445 R St # 1, Lincoln, NE 68503
For more information about senior living options: (844) 490-3973
This collection of experiences paints a complex picture of a place and the systems surrounding it. On one hand, there are references to friendly staff and residents who create a warm, livable environment, and to owners who seem to take care of people. On the other hand, the same accounts describe a culture of rules, frequent departures, and a pervasive sense that things aren't always what they seem. The contrast between these impressions makes the place feel like it can be a good home for some, but a source of frustration and fear for others who encounter the harsher sides of its operations.
Several reviewers express that the place could be a great home, but that the problem lies in how rules are enforced and who is punished for not following them. The sentiment conveyed is that people who question procedures or push back against what they're told are targeted, sometimes removed, and then told falsehoods about why they were asked to leave. The tone suggests a culture where dissent is discouraged and where the consequences for challenging the status quo are severe enough to damage reputations and livelihoods. In this view, the difficulties aren't just about individual missteps; they're about a broader environment that discourages scrutiny.
A recurring theme centers on the cost and perceived quality of care. One account cites a charge of about 1,200 (presumably dollars) and argues that the actual care received does not justify the price. It's described as a mismatch between what residents pay and what they experience, with only a small number of staff members seen as truly competent staffing the facility. The image painted is of a nursing home where some residents are described in demeaning terms, hinted at by phrases like "zombies" who are heavily medicated. In this portrayal, residents are performing tasks that should be the staff's job, and the compensation for those tasks is described as meager - far below minimum wage - further underscoring a sense of unfair labor dynamics within the operation.
There is also a strongly personal thread about homelessness and the erosion of housing stability tied to interactions with individuals and agencies. One account asserts that homelessness followed after allegations were made about the author threatening others, and the narrative places responsibility on specific people for misrepresenting the situation. The claim is that police intervention or a formal process should have preceded any housing loss, but instead the person ended up without a home due to what they see as spiteful accusations. This personal crisis is set against a broader backdrop of dissatisfaction with how people are treated when they speak up or demand accountability.
The experience of having a family member in the same facility is described with warmth by some, noting that the staff could be friendly and that the rooms are of decent size. This counterpoint adds to the overall sense that the place can be agreeable and comfortable under the right circumstances, and that not everyone sees it in the same negative light. It is the tension between the positive and negative experiences that appears to color most reviews, leaving potential residents to weigh personal needs and tolerance for conflict against the allure of a supportive community.
A significant portion of the narrative focuses on specific, troubling interactions involving advocates and administrators. The reviewer details a troubling episode in which someone referred to as HAZE allegedly pledged to advocate on their behalf but instead engaged with others without the reviewer's presence, supposedly undermining disability rights and the reviewer's legal protections as a disabled person. The complaint describes a one-hour meeting with staff from affiliated organizations without the reviewer's participation, a cancellation of a follow-up, and a pattern of rude conduct toward the reviewer and their therapy dog. The core accusation is that HAZE did not uphold promised advocacy and instead contributed to a sense of betrayal and harm.
Compounding these grievances is a sense of systemic neglect and miscommunication across multiple agencies. The reviewer lists a wide array of organizations - ARC, Lincoln Action Program, Nebraska Disability Rights, Matt Talbot, and others - charged with providing support and advocacy, and asserts that none of them offered meaningful assistance. The claim extends to financial and bureaucratic implications, suggesting that these federally and state-funded programs routinely bill for Medicare and Medicaid but fail to deliver real help to the reviewer, who identifies as disabled and in need of robust advocacy. The broad brush of frustration implies a pattern of denial and misallocation of resources rather than isolated incidents.
Finally, the narrative frames a deeper sense of personal betrayal and systemic injustice. The author reflects on a life of service - working for state legislators, volunteering for campaigns, and contributing to professional associations - only to feel marginalized and abandoned when they most need help because of disability. They describe a feeling of being blacklisted and singled out for hardship, contrasting their own experiences with those of others who receive extensive assistance. The emotional weight of these statements underscores a larger judgment about how society and local institutions handle disability, housing, and access to justice.
Taken together, the collection of impressions presents a multifaceted portrait: a community that can be kind and accommodating under the right conditions, but one that also appears to harbor punitive practices, questionable management decisions, and a frustrating web of bureaucratic barriers. The core tension centers on care quality vs. cost, the ethics of advocacy and accountability, and the experience of individuals who feel unheard and unsupported by the institutions that are supposed to protect them. The result is a narrative that urges careful scrutiny of both the day-to-day operations and the broader systems that influence housing, healthcare, and disabled rights in the community.
OUR Homes in Lincoln, NE is an assisted living community that specializes in memory care. Our dedicated staff provides exceptional care and support for individuals with memory impairments, ensuring their safety and well-being at all times.
Within our community, residents can enjoy a variety of amenities designed to enhance their quality of life. We offer devotional services off-site, providing spiritual guidance and support to those who desire it. Additionally, our indoor common areas provide a comfortable and inviting space for socializing and engaging in activities.
At OUR Homes, we understand the unique needs of individuals with diabetes. That is why we offer specialized diabetic care to ensure that residents receive the proper support and assistance in managing their condition.
We believe in promoting an active and fulfilling lifestyle for our residents. Through devotional activities off-site, residents have the opportunity to connect with their faith and participate in meaningful religious practices.
Located in Lincoln, NE, our community benefits from its proximity to various amenities. With six cafes nearby, residents have plenty of options when it comes to enjoying a delicious meal or meeting friends for coffee. We are also conveniently located near seven parks, providing opportunities for outdoor recreation and relaxation.
For any healthcare needs, there are 14 pharmacies within close proximity to our community, ensuring that residents can easily access necessary medications and supplies. Additionally, there are 32 physicians nearby who specialize in various fields of medicine, guaranteeing comprehensive healthcare services for our residents.
When it comes to dining out or trying new culinary experiences, there are 29 restaurants available nearby offering a wide range of cuisines to cater to different preferences.
Transportation is made simple with two transportation options located nearby: ensuring that residents can easily travel around the local area as needed. For those seeking spiritual fulfillment or wishing to attend religious services regularly, there is one place of worship situated close by.
Residents looking for entertainment have easy access to one theater where they can enjoy movies or shows. Furthermore, in case of any medical emergencies, there are eight hospitals nearby, providing peace of mind for residents and their families.
At OUR Homes in Lincoln, NE, we strive to create a supportive and enriching environment for individuals requiring memory care. With top-notch care services, various amenities, and a convenient location near numerous amenities, our community is dedicated to providing an exceptional living experience for our residents.
OUR Homes is located at 2445 R St # 1, Lincoln, NE 68503 in Lancaster County, Nebraska
Yes, OUR Homes provides memory care services for residents with mild or advanced stages of dementia or Alzheimer's disease.
Gateway Vista
Lincoln, NE
Caring staff with effective therapy and high-quality, low-sodium meals in a welcoming atmosphere.
Gateway Vista costs
Gateway Vista reviews
Gateway Vista images
Legacy Terrace
Lincoln, NE
Multiple care levels (AL/IL/Memory Care) with on-site amenities.
Legacy Terrace costs
Legacy Terrace reviews
Legacy Terrace images
The Residence at Gramercy
Lincoln, NE
Friendly, attentive staff in a clean, engaging community.
The Residence at Gramercy costs
The Residence at Gramercy reviews
The Residence at Gramercy images
Exploring the Power of Reminiscence Therapy for Individuals With Dementia
Reminiscence therapy helps individuals with dementia recall past memories through structured discussions and meaningful objects, enhancing mood, relationships, and sense of identity while celebrating their lives. It can be practiced in formal settings or at home, requiring sensitivity to personal histories and cultural backgrounds.
An In-Depth Look at Reminiscence Therapy in Dementia Care
Reminiscence therapy is a structured method for older adults, especially those with dementia, to share life stories using prompts and sensory cues, fostering emotional well-being, social engagement, and self-identity. It aims to improve quality of life by enhancing interpersonal connections and cognitive stimulation while requiring careful facilitation to avoid distressing memories.
Dementia-Related Hallucinations: Causes, Experiences, and Practical Approaches
Dementia, particularly Lewy body dementia, often involves hallucinations that can significantly distress both patients and caregivers due to disruptions in sensory processing and neurotransmitter imbalances. Effective management includes compassionate communication, environmental adjustments, and a multidisciplinary approach to care while addressing the emotional needs of caregivers.