2445 R St # 1, Lincoln, NE 68503
To contact a resident: (402) 474-4922
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of OUR Homes
Pros
It is a great place to live.- There are a lot of friendly staff and residents.
- The owners take care of residents.
- A family member loves it there.
- The staff is friendly and the rooms are a decent size.
Cons
The place is said to have a vendetta against smart people who question things, leading to expulsions and a bad reputation. - The price (1,200) is criticized as too high for the quality of care provided.
- It is described as a nursing home with residents who are zombies due to heavy medication.
- Residents are alleged to do the staff’s jobs for wages far below minimum wage.
- Shelley and Rob are accused of making allegations that caused homelessness.
- HAZE is said to have lied, not advocated for the reviewer, and arranged meetings without the reviewer present, causing pain and suffering.
- HAZE is described as rude, laughing at the reviewer and their dog, and calling them "Stinky."
- Nick Fluelling is accused of taking personal information and making empty promises with no real help.
- The reviewer claims multiple agencies refuse to help, leading to imminent homelessness, and that they feel blacklisted as a decent citizen.
- It is alleged that these agencies bill Medicare/Medicaid yet refuse to help, despite being federally and state funded.
Review
OUR Homes in Lincoln, NE is best suited for families seeking a small, home-like community where warmth and accessibility of staff are the defining traits. The reviews consistently highlight friendly staff and residents, and owners who take care of the place. The space tends to favor a personal touch over clinical polish, with rooms described as decently sized, contributing to a residential vibe rather than a hospital corridor. In short, it fits seniors who want companionship, less formality, and a more intimate setting, and who are comfortable navigating potential gaps in formal care governance.
However, those who prioritize rigorous care standards, transparent accounting, and consistent advocacy for disabled residents should consider alternatives. Several reviews portray a pattern of pricing concerns (notably around a $1,200 figure) paired with perceived inadequate care, suggesting the facility may not align with expectations for value. Others warn of heavy medication, staff shortcomings, and a culture where residents are doing tasks that staff should perform. For families needing strong protective oversight, explicit documentation, fewer contradictions in communication, and robust complaint resolution, alternatives that emphasize clinical oversight and transparent governance are worth exploring.
On the positive side, the human element matters. The most credible advantages are approachable staff, personal attention from owners, and a lived-in sense of community where residents mingle and look out for each other. These factors can offset certain administrative rough edges when care needs are modest and social engagement is the priority. Yet the best pros barely blunt the sting of the major cons: a price point that many families will question, questions about who actually delivers care versus who coordinates it, and incidents where residents allegedly faced inadequate advocacy and inconsistent communication. In short, the warmth helps, but it does not erase the risk that core care and rights could be mishandled.
Several reviews describe a troubling pattern around advocacy, accountability, and documentation. Claims of misrepresentation, signatory issues, and a claim that residents could be railroaded into unfavorable outcomes point to governance weaknesses that are not easily dismissed. Accusations of rude behavior, broken promises, and a lack of supervisor responsiveness muddy trust further. The combination of allegations of heavy medication and residents performing staff duties raises red flags about staffing levels, training, and the overall workflow culture. While some residents report satisfaction, the loudest warnings are about due process, safety, and the ability to protect disabled rights.
When evaluating this community, families should insist on seeing current care plans, a detailed fee breakdown, and a clear, written advocate process. Visit with multiple residents and ask about daily routines, whether staff consistently meet needs in a timely fashion, and how complaints are resolved. Request copies of any consent or authorization paperwork and verify who handles leasing, billing, and medical coordination. If sensitive issues around guardianship, safety, or potential homelessness are of concern, bring them to a live conversation with the executive team and a neutral ombudsman if available. The right choice hinges on whether the warmth and community outweighs the risk of governance and care gaps.
Ultimately, this community serves a niche: a warm, intimate setting for seniors who can tolerate, or even welcome, a lighter clinical framework and strong personal attention from owners. For families seeking rigorous medical oversight, transparent pricing, and reliable advocacy for disabled residents, alternatives with clearer governance and higher care standards are strongly recommended. The decision hinges on balancing the importance of a friendly, homelike atmosphere against the real concerns raised about care adequacy, billing clarity, and advocacy reliability. A careful, on-site assessment and candid conversations with current residents and staff will reveal whether the fit is right now or if movement to a more regulated option is warranted.
Assisted Living
Memory Care
Activities on-site
Devotional services off-site
Indoor common areas
Lincoln Municipal (5 miles away)
Ambulatory care
Diabetic care
Meals provided
Exploring the Power of Reminiscence Therapy for Individuals With Dementia
An In-Depth Look at Reminiscence Therapy in Dementia Care
Dementia-Related Hallucinations: Causes, Experiences, and Practical Approaches