1250 E Springfield Road, Sullivan, MO 63080
To contact a resident: (573) 468-5217
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Victorian Place of Sullivan Costs & Pricing
Victorian Place of Sullivan offers competitive pricing for its residents while providing a comfortable and supportive living environment. For a semi-private room, residents can expect to pay $2,227 per month, which is notably lower than the average cost in Washington County at $2,557 and significantly more affordable than the statewide average of $3,772. Additionally, the two-bedroom option at Victorian Place is priced at $3,294 per month, again offering an appealing alternative compared to local and state averages - Washington County's cost stands at $3,578, while Missouri as a whole averages $3,675. This positions Victorian Place as an attractive choice for families seeking quality care without straining their financial resources.
| Floor plans | Victorian Place of Sullivan | Washington County | Missouri |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $2,227 | $2,557 | $3,772 |
| 2 Bedrooms | $3,294 | $3,578 | $3,675 |
Overall Review of Victorian Place of Sullivan
Pros
The Victorian place is wonderful and everyone takes really good care of Lawana.
Lawana is very happy to be there.
The staff are really helpful and great.
The CMAs work their butts off.
The place is a beautiful place.
Cons
The activity director gets paid for doing nothing.
The nurse is hardly ever there and doesn't do her job right.
There is only one CMA on the overnight shift for 20-21 residents.
The place needs a security guard.
Residents don't get enough food, with very small portions and the meals aren't good.
Residents are fed a lot of starches.
The doctor and the nurse practitioner come out only every two weeks.
Review
Victorian Place of Sullivan is best suited for seniors who prize a warm, home-like atmosphere and staff interactions that feel genuinely engaged on a day-to-day basis. The community presents as a beautiful, comfortable setting where residents and families often sense care and kindness from frontline staff. It tends to work well for residents with moderate care needs who benefit from people-focused daily routines, and for families willing to stay actively involved in care planning to ensure that for the most part the day-to-day experience remains personal and reassuring.
That said, there are clear reasons to consider alternatives, especially for residents who require consistent clinical oversight. Reviews point to gaps in nursing presence: the nurse is described as infrequent and not always effective, with CNAs shouldering much of the nursing workload. Overnight staffing appears stretched, with a single CNA covering 20–21 residents. Medical oversight comes via a nurse practitioner who visits only about every two weeks, and there is a sentiment that security coverage is insufficient. Families prioritizing steady medical monitoring, reliable physician contact, and robust safety protocols may find this combination inadequate.
The strongest positives in the mix are the environment and the on-the-ground care culture. Several reviewers call the facility a “beautiful place,” and stories emphasize that the staff are helpful, attentive, and kind in everyday interactions. There are affirmations that staff genuinely care for residents and go the extra mile, including one heartfelt note about how well a resident named Lawana is cared for. When care staff are present and responsive, the experience can feel personal and reassuring, even if medical oversight is not perfectly constant.
Food and activity programming emerge as the decisive friction points. Meals are described by some as repetitive, with small portions and too many starch-heavy options, which can leave residents feeling unsatisfied and underfed. At the same time, activity leadership is criticized as ineffective by some, suggesting a gap between the potential energy of a well-designed activity program and its execution. The disparity between a beautiful setting and inconsistent meal quality or activity engagement can undermine the overall sense of well-being, particularly for residents who rely on structured routines to stay engaged.
For families weighing the decision, concrete questions are essential. Seek specifics on staffing ratios by shift, the exact schedule for nurse and NP visits, and response times to call bells. Review menu cycles, portion sizes, and whether dietary needs or preferences can be accommodated beyond a standard starch-forward plan. Inquire about security measures, incident history, and the availability of emergency medical support at all hours. If possible, observe mealtime and activity periods, and speak with multiple residents and family members to gauge consistency between what is promised and what is delivered.
Ultimately, Victorian Place of Sullivan leans toward those who value a comforting, aesthetically pleasing home with caring staff who can be exceptionally responsive in everyday tasks, while accepting that medical oversight may be intermittent and certain logistical gaps exist. Families who require steady nursing presence, frequent physician input, robust security, or consistently varied dining and engaging activities may want to explore other communities first. This is a facility that can be a good fit if the emotional warmth and daily attentiveness are prioritized, and if a proactive, involved family is prepared to supplement care with outside medical and dietary planning.





















Comprehensive Residential Support and Assisted Living Solutions for Individuals with Disabilities
Comprehensive Supportive Living Arrangements for Adults with Disabilities
Funding and Affording Assisted Living: A Thorough Overview



