730 Hodiamont, St. Louis, MO 63112
To contact a resident: (314) 725-3709
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Saddler Residential Care Facility Costs & Pricing
Saddler Residential Care Facility offers competitive pricing compared to both St. Louis city and the broader Missouri state averages. For a studio, residents can expect to pay $2,995 per month, which is significantly lower than the city's average of $4,234 and even below Missouri's average of $3,418. Similarly, for semi-private accommodations at Saddler, the cost is $3,500 - again more affordable than St. Louis city's rate of $3,994 and slightly above Missouri's average of $3,772. The 1-bedroom options range from $4,000 to $4,995; while on the higher end compared to both locality and state figures ($3,885 for St. Louis city and $3,349 for Missouri), they still provide flexibility in pricing that may suit different budgets. However, when it comes to 2-bedroom units at Saddler priced at a monthly rate of $8,250, they exceed local ($3,787) and state averages ($3,675) by a considerable margin. Overall, Saddler Residential Care Facility positions itself as an attractive option for various living arrangements while reflecting a complex balance between quality care and affordability within the region.
| Floor plans | Saddler Residential Care Facility | St. Louis city | Missouri |
|---|---|---|---|
| Studio | $2,995 | $4,234 | $3,418 |
| Semi-Private | $3,500 | $3,994 | $3,772 |
| 1 Bedroom | $4,000 to $4,995 | $3,885 | $3,349 |
| 2 Bedrooms | $8,250 | $3,787 | $3,675 |
Overall Review of Saddler Residential Care Facility
Pros
The place is described as a great place.
The owner buys clothes for residents with her own funds.
Residents have cable and a private phone to call family.
Most residents have stayed there for over 15 years.
Observers believe the owner works hard for the residents.
Supporters encourage her to keep up the good work.
The reviewer expresses faith that God has the owner's back.
Cons
The facility is described as a disgusting mess with a huge bedbug infestation, with bedbugs visible on furniture and even crawling on a resident.
The owner is accused of neglecting residents by not addressing the bed bugs and of yelling at them.
It is alleged that the owner sat with her boyfriend during the pest problem, implying disregard for residentsā well-being.
Staff are claimed to be paid to clean up bed bugs and run errands, but on one occasion were not paid and nearly fought with an elderly resident.
The reviews claim there is neglect and abuse at the facility and that authorities should shut it down.
Review
Saddler Residential Care Facility in St. Louis is best suited for families seeking a small, owner-operated environment where personal attention and continuity matter most. The setup appears to attract residents who stay for many years, signaling a homelike, intimate vibe and a caregiver who takes a hands-on approach. This is not a facility designed for those who require robust clinical nursing oversight, complex medical management, or highly structured programming. For families prioritizing warmth, direct proprietor involvement, and a sense that residents are known personally, Saddler can feel like a reassuring, long-term home.
Those who may want to consider alternatives include families who demand stringent safety standards, transparent staff accountability, and professional oversight. Alleged issues raised in reviews, serious concerns about pest infestations, potential neglect, and questionable behavior by the owner, underscore the reality that this setting can present significant risk without external checks. If there is any priority placed on formal licensing rigor, regular pest control reporting, measurable staff-to-resident ratios, or clear procedures for handling complaints, exploring other options is prudent. In short, anyone needing robust regulatory assurance should look elsewhere.
The available positives, an owner who appears personally invested, willingness to fund certain resident comforts, access to cable, and a private line to contact family, plus a sense that many residents have long-tenured, stable relationships, give Saddler a distinctive, homey appeal. These strengths can translate into genuine warmth, continuity of care, and a feeling of belonging that larger facilities often cannot match. When families can verify that the environment remains consistent, well-meaning, and resident-centered, these pros can counterbalance some limitations. However, the magnitude of the reported drawbacks cannot be dismissed, and the positives do not magically erase the safety and reliability concerns.
The most glaring red flags are safety-related and demand critical scrutiny. Allegations of bed bugs and visible pest problems, coupled with accounts of neglect and tense interactions between staff and residents, point to risks that could undermine daily well-being. Even if some residents appear comfortable and longstanding, pest exposure, potential lapses in care, and perceived inconsistencies in accountability create a fragile care platform. Families must assess not only current conditions but also whether there is credible evidence of effective pest management, prompt response to resident needs, and transparent, independent oversight that remains consistent over time.
Compared with alternative options, Saddler may still suit a family willing to trade formal systems for a tightly knit, owner-driven setting, provided rigorous due diligence is completed. Larger, professionally staffed assisted living communities typically offer clearer staffing ratios, more standardized procedures, and routine inspections that can reduce risk. For residents with escalating medical needs or cognitive impairment, facilities with certified nursing support and formal incident reporting are usually preferable. If choosing Saddler, prepare to verify regulatory compliance, inspect pest control records, request recent inspection reports, and speak directly with residents and staff about daily routines and safety assurances.
To move forward with confidence, conduct a focused on-site evaluation and demand transparency. Schedule a thorough tour, ask to review pest control logs, maintenance records, and recent inspection reports, and request a detailed explanation of any past incidents. Speak with multiple residents and family members about responsiveness, meal service, and activity options. Confirm licensing status and any disciplinary history, and inquire about staff training, turnover, and emergency procedures. Above all, ensure there is a concrete plan to address pest-related issues, safeguarding measures for residents, and a clear channel for complaints, without which the warmth and loyalty suggested by the positives cannot compensate for the elevated safety risks.









Assisted Living Expenses and Long-Term Care Insurance: A Comprehensive Exploration
Securing Financial Support for Assisted Living: A Comprehensive Overview
Social Security Benefits and Assisted Living: Navigating Options Across the U.S.