Saddler Residential Care Facility
Save
730 Hodiamont, St. Louis, MO 63112
For more information about senior living options: (844) 490-3973
Saddler Residential Care Facility offers competitive pricing compared to both St. Louis city and the broader Missouri state averages. For a studio, residents can expect to pay $2,995 per month, which is significantly lower than the city's average of $4,234 and even below Missouri's average of $3,418. Similarly, for semi-private accommodations at Saddler, the cost is $3,500 - again more affordable than St. Louis city's rate of $3,994 and slightly above Missouri's average of $3,772. The 1-bedroom options range from $4,000 to $4,995; while on the higher end compared to both locality and state figures ($3,885 for St. Louis city and $3,349 for Missouri), they still provide flexibility in pricing that may suit different budgets. However, when it comes to 2-bedroom units at Saddler priced at a monthly rate of $8,250, they exceed local ($3,787) and state averages ($3,675) by a considerable margin. Overall, Saddler Residential Care Facility positions itself as an attractive option for various living arrangements while reflecting a complex balance between quality care and affordability within the region.
| Floor plans | Saddler Residential Care Facility | St. Louis city | Missouri |
|---|---|---|---|
| Studio | $2,995 | $4,234 | $3,418 |
| Semi-Private | $3,500 | $3,994 | $3,772 |
| 1 Bedroom | $4,000 to $4,995 | $3,885 | $3,349 |
| 2 Bedrooms | $8,250 | $3,787 | $3,675 |
The two reviews present a strikingly mixed picture of a long-standing care facility, highlighting a tug-of-war between generosity and serious safety concerns. On one side, a caller paints a portrait of a devoted, business-owner-led home where the owner is described as going out of her way to support residents. According to this account, she pays for clothes for residents from her own funds, provides cable television and a private phone so residents can call family, and maintains that many residents have lived there for more than 15 years. The reviewer emphasizes the owner's hard work, arguing that the community is built on her personal sacrifice and that those who criticize her are spreading falsehoods. The sense conveyed is one of gratitude and loyalty: the facility is a place of care because of one woman's continued personal investment, including support for burials and other essential needs that the reviewer asserts are covered by her generosity.
That same account attempts to counter negative impressions by suggesting that some criticisms are unfounded or driven by misunderstandings. The reviewer notes a claim that the owner was seen "sitting with her boyfriend," but counters it by saying the boyfriend was in the hospital a year prior, thereby arguing that the claim is not only inaccurate but a misrepresentation of her situation. The tone here is protective, aiming to reconcile a perception of dedication with the reality of what the reviewer believes to be a fair evaluation: a facility that has thrived for a quarter of a century, in part, because the owner is believed to be deeply invested in her residents' well-being. The reviewer even argues against what they see as a "blatant lie" and questions the legitimacy of negative portrayals, suggesting that critical thinking and honest assessment are being compromised in public discourse.
In sharp contrast, a second reviewer delivers a highly critical, distressing account detailing what they describe as a pervasive bedbug crisis. They describe seeing a "HUGGEEEEEEE bedbug issue" with bugs appearing on furniture in plain sight, and express alarm at a scene where an employee is applying rubbing alcohol to cope with the problem, while the owner supposedly sits nearby with her boyfriend and appears unconcerned. The reviewer asserts that bedbugs were crawling around a resident, and that the owner did nothing to address the situation, telling the resident to return to his room instead. This portrayal emphasizes a sense of neglect and fear, suggesting that basic sanitary conditions were ignored and that the staff's efforts to manage the infestation were inadequate or misguided.
The same reviewer expands the critique by alleging patterns of conduct that go beyond a single incident. They claim to have witnessed the owner yell and raise her hand at a resident, and they suggest the owner uses money as an incentive for staff to perform tasks like cleaning up bed bugs or running errands for the facility. According to this account, when payments or expectations were not met, tensions could escalate into near confrontations, painting a grim picture of an environment where resident safety and staff boundaries may be compromised in favor of apartment-level expedience or personal leverage. The reviewer implies systemic issues rather than isolated lapses, arguing that the facility's leadership may prioritize control or convenience over residents' well-being.
The broader narrative across both reviews is one of stark contradictions that leave prospective observers with a complicated impression. On one hand, there is a strong defense of the facility's longevity and of the owner's generosity, with claims that residents are cared for with tangible, personal investments - clothes, communication tools, family contact, and even burials - by someone described as tirelessly hardworking. On the other hand, there are vivid, alarming allegations of a severe bedbug infestation, visible neglect of residents, and aggressive behavioral conduct by the owner toward residents, all of which the reviewer says they witnessed firsthand and intend to push to media and regulatory channels. The tension between these two depictions raises questions about the true conditions inside the facility, how daily operations are managed, and who truly bears responsibility for residents' safety and dignity.
One recurring thread is the belief that public sentiment toward the facility is influenced by conflicting narratives and potential biases. The first reviewer resists negative portrayals and argues that positive experiences are being dismissed or deleted from public platforms, even noting that Google may remove favorable reviews. The second reviewer pushes back with specifics of harm and hazard, urging external scrutiny and enforcement actions. Together, the accounts imply a longstanding institution that has earned loyalty from some families while simultaneously attracting serious accusations from others who encountered distressing conditions and perceived mismanagement. The contrast invites a careful, independent assessment of what actually happens behind the doors, with attention to verifiable facts, current safety practices, and the real experiences of residents and staff.
In the end, the two perspectives underscore a broader cautionary note about how care facilities can be seen through vastly different lenses. One view centers on personal generosity, long-term residency, and the sense that a singular, dedicated owner shapes a community with compassion and financial support for essential needs. The other view centers on serious health and safety concerns, witnessed neglect, and allegations of coercive or retaliatory behavior that could endanger residents and strain staff. Given the potential stakes for residents' welfare, these divergent testimonies highlight the importance of independent verification, regulatory oversight, and transparent, accountable operations to ensure that care decisions are guided by residents' safety, dignity, and well-being above all else.
Saddler Residential Care Facility in St. Louis, MO, is a board and care home that offers a comfortable and welcoming environment for seniors in need of assistance with daily living. Our facility provides a range of amenities to ensure the well-being and comfort of our residents.
Each room is fully furnished and equipped with cable or satellite TV, telephone service, and Wi-Fi/high-speed internet access. Our residents can enjoy their meals in our spacious dining room where we cater to special dietary restrictions. Housekeeping services are provided to maintain cleanliness and tidiness.
We understand the importance of maintaining an active lifestyle, which is why we offer various activities for our residents. These include resident-run activities as well as scheduled daily activities to keep everyone engaged and fulfilled.
At Saddler Residential Care Facility, we prioritize the health and safety of our residents. With 24-hour supervision, assistance with activities of daily living such as bathing and dressing, as well as transfers, our trained staff ensures that each individual receives personalized care.
Our dedicated team also coordinates with healthcare providers to ensure seamless medical care for our residents. From medication management to diabetes diets and mental wellness programs, we strive to meet the specific needs of each resident.
For transportation needs, we arrange rides for medical appointments as well as provide transportation options nearby. Our central location ensures easy access to nearby amenities including cafes, parks, pharmacies, physicians' offices, restaurants, places of worship, theaters, and hospitals.
Saddler Residential Care Facility is committed to providing a warm and nurturing community where seniors can thrive. We strive to create a supportive environment that promotes independence while offering personalized care services tailored to individual needs.
This section of Saint Louis, Missouri offers a convenient and diverse range of amenities for seniors looking to relocate to the area. There are several cafes within close proximity for socializing and enjoying coffee, as well as numerous restaurants offering a variety of dining options. The neighborhood is also home to several reputable hospitals and pharmacies, ensuring easy access to healthcare services. In terms of recreation, there are several parks nearby for outdoor activities and relaxation. Additionally, transportation options such as the Zooline Railroad and Metrolink North Hanley Station provide convenient ways to get around the city. With places of worship and theaters also in the area, this section of Saint Louis provides a vibrant and accessible community for senior living.
Saddler Residential Care Facility offers competitive pricing compared to both St. Louis city and the broader Missouri state averages. For a studio, residents can expect to pay $2,995 per month, which is significantly lower than the city's average of $4,234 and even below Missouri's average of $3,418. Similarly, for semi-private accommodations at Saddler, the cost is $3,500 - again more affordable than St. Louis city's rate of $3,994 and slightly above Missouri's average of $3,772. The 1-bedroom options range from $4,000 to $4,995; while on the higher end compared to both locality and state figures ($3,885 for St. Louis city and $3,349 for Missouri), they still provide flexibility in pricing that may suit different budgets. However, when it comes to 2-bedroom units at Saddler priced at a monthly rate of $8,250, they exceed local ($3,787) and state averages ($3,675) by a considerable margin. Overall, Saddler Residential Care Facility positions itself as an attractive option for various living arrangements while reflecting a complex balance between quality care and affordability within the region.
Saddler Residential Care Facility is located at 730 Hodiamont, St. Louis, MO 63112 in St. Louis city, Missouri
Ackert Park Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation Cente
University City, MO
Extensive on-site amenities (salon, dining, fitness, library, gaming) with 24/7 supervision for skilled nursing.
Ackert Park Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation Cente reviews
Ackert Park Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation Cente images
Alpha Terrace Apartments
St. Louis, MO
Extensive nearby amenities and healthcare access.
Alpha Terrace Apartments reviews
Alpha Terrace Apartments images
Kingsland Walk Senior Living
University City, MO
Clean, modern campus with friendly staff, spacious apartments, and engaging activities.
Kingsland Walk Senior Living reviews
Kingsland Walk Senior Living images
Allegro Richmond Heights
Richmond Heights, MO
Friendly staff, good dining, clean, engaging activities, and strong memory care.
Allegro Richmond Heights costs
Allegro Richmond Heights reviews
Allegro Richmond Heights images
HomeTeam Transition Management Group LLC
Clayton, MO
Pleasant first visit and some responsiveness.
HomeTeam Transition Management Group LLC reviews
HomeTeam Transition Management Group LLC images
Assisted Living Expenses and Long-Term Care Insurance: A Comprehensive Exploration
The article discusses assisted living expenses, the importance of long-term care insurance in covering these costs, and various financing options, highlighting the need for careful policy review and early planning to address potential needs. It also clarifies common misconceptions about Medicare and private health insurance limitations regarding long-term care coverage.
Securing Financial Support for Assisted Living: A Comprehensive Overview
Assisted living facilities offer crucial support for older adults needing help with daily activities but come with varying and significant costs, which can be financed through personal savings, government assistance programs, long-term care insurance, and home equity options. Professional guidance from experts can aid families in navigating these financial complexities to establish a sustainable budgeting approach for assisted living services.
Social Security Benefits and Assisted Living: Navigating Options Across the U.S.
Assisted living costs often exceed Social Security benefits, necessitating a combination of funding sources like state aid and Medicaid. Understanding the interaction between Social Security programs and available financial support is essential for affording such care.