320 East Little Brick Road, Cameron, MO 64429
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Village Costs & Pricing
In the Village, the housing costs present an attractive alternative compared to both DeKalb County and the broader state of Missouri. For instance, a one-bedroom apartment is available for $1,350 per month, a notably lower figure than the average $4,281 in DeKalb County and $3,349 across the state. Similarly, studio apartments are priced at $1,350 as well, which is more economical than their counterparts in DeKalb County at $3,378 and Missouri's statewide average of $3,418. This competitive pricing makes the Village an appealing option for individuals and families seeking affordable living solutions without compromising on quality or convenience.
| Floor plans | Village | DeKalb County | Missouri |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Bedroom | $1,350 | $4,281 | $3,349 |
| Studio | $1,350 | $3,378 | $3,418 |
Overall Review of Village
Pros
The facility is a nice care facility.
The food is good.
The staff are great.
The owners are on site.
It is the best elderly facility in Cameron.
The facility is nice and clean with friendly employees.
The rooms are nice, clean, and of good size.
The service is fast.
The staff are very friendly and caring.
The nursing staff is amazing and the atmosphere is friendly.
Cons
The lady at the front office is EXTREMELY rude as well as unprofessional.
It wasn't just one day, it was several.
The reviewer hopes she is not that disrespectful to any of the residents.
There are staff members described as zombies who don't even know their own names.
Review
This community is best suited for families seeking a warm, community-driven assisted living environment where staff engagement is hands-on and visible, and where owners are on site and deeply involved. It suits seniors who prize a social, home-like atmosphere, dependable, friendly care, and reliable, tasty meals. With a rating of 4.4 from 40 reviews, the Village in Cameron, MO consistently earns praise for its approachable culture, clean setting, and the sense that residents are appreciated and known by name. For families that want a place with longevity, where residents often stay for years, and where everyday warmth is part of the core experience, this is a compelling option.
Alternatives are worth considering for families with a sharper emphasis on administrative consistency and higher medical intensity. If front-desk interactions are a frequent decision-maker, or if a flawlessly professional, uniformly courteous administrative team is non-negotiable, other options may deliver a more consistently polished first impression. Likewise, if needs extend beyond traditional assisted living into more intensive medical oversight, memory-care specifics, or larger-scale campuses with specialized units, exploring nearby facilities with a broader range of services could be prudent. In short, this community earns endorsements for its heart; those requiring a more formal, corporate cadence or broader medical capabilities might want to compare carefully.
The strongest positives center on people and culture. Families repeatedly highlight friendly, caring staff who attend to residents with evident warmth and persistence. The ownersâ hands-on presence is repeatedly noted as a stabilizing force that reinforces trust and accountability. Cleanliness and a well-kept atmosphere pair with good, satisfying meals, contributing to a sense of daily well-being. The social fabric appears robust, with residents and families forming strong, long-standing ties; several accounts celebrate residents who have thrived there for many years. In practical terms, these elements translate into predictable daily routines, responsive care, and a feeling that a residentâs happiness matters.
Still, there are notable drawbacks mentioned by a minority of reviewers. The most recurring concern centers on the front office, described in some accounts as rude or unprofessional. A few comments suggest the need for more consistent courteous interaction at the reception and administrative level. There is also a flavor of frustration from less-than-ideal personal connections, one review mentions staff not knowing names or sustaining a certain level of impersonal norming. While these outliers do not define the community, they are real and should be weighed against the broader pattern of warmth and attentiveness that most residents experience.
In weighing the pros against the cons, the Villageâs strengths carry considerable weight. The combination of owner involvement, a welcoming staff, and a tradition of long-tenured residents creates a stable, trustworthy environment where families can feel confident in daily care and social vitality. The emphasis on good food, cleanliness, and fast service further reduces stress for caregivers and residents alike, helping to offset the occasional administrative friction. For families prioritizing genuine human connection, staff stability, and a thriving community life, these attributes often outweigh the less desirable signals about front-desk interactions.
For families actively selecting an assisted-living option, an on-site tour with a specific focus on the front desk experience is advisable. Observe how staff greet residents and visitors, how quickly questions are answered, and how concerns are handled in real time. Ask to sample a meal, review the calendar of activities, and speak with several caregivers about day-to-day routines. Compare the experience with a couple of nearby facilities to gauge consistency of warmth, responsiveness, and overall pace of life. When the priority is a close-knit community that genuinely treats residents like family, the Village in Cameron stands out as a strong, practical choice, provided the front-office dynamics are part of the visitorâs due diligence.








Comprehensive Insights into Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and Their Assessment
Medicare Coverage for Assisted Living: An In-Depth Exploration
Your Comprehensive Guide to Luxury Assisted Living: Elevated Facilities, Amenities, and Costs