Star B Rest Personal Care Home

Pros

• They showed concern for their dad's dental hygiene by purchasing a device to clean his teeth.
• They took proactive steps to arrange care by hiring a caregiving company in January 2025.
• They demonstrated initiative and responsibility in attempting to maintain his oral hygiene.

Cons

• The reviewer believes the father's care was negligent, contributing to sepsis due to malnourishment and untreated sores.
• The father arrived malnourished with foot sores, dentures and gums full of food, and an unshaven appearance, indicating neglect.
• The father was left wet for long periods, signaling poor hygiene.
• The company was hired in January 2025 but is accused of changing the schedule for its own benefit.
• The caregiver allegedly did more work for a non-client spouse than for the client, showing misallocation of care.
• A device bought to clean the father's teeth appears unused, suggesting wasted effort or lack of utilization.
• Overall, the experience is described as negative and unsatisfactory.

Review

A family recounting describes a disturbing experience with a care company that began when their father arrived at FG with sepsis. The account emphasizes a rapid decline in condition and a series of troubling concerns about basic care and attention. According to the writer, the first impression was that the level of care did not meet even the most fundamental standards, and the narrative quickly grows into a pattern of neglect that the family found hard to overlook. The situation is described in stark terms, focusing on the infant stages of illness and the surrounding care environment as if the clock started ticking from that moment of arrival.

The reviewer goes into detail about the father's condition upon arrival. They say he was malnourished and had sores on his foot, and his dentures and gums were full of food. The description paints a picture of someone who was not being kept clean or properly nourished, with several basic indicators of neglect that would be hard to ignore for anyone who cares for an elderly or medically frail family member. The report highlights a lack of basic personal care, citing unshaved appearance and other signs that, in the writer's view, pointed to insufficient attention to daily grooming and hygiene. The combination of malnourishment, oral debris, and untreated sores is presented as a stark sign of inadequate care from the outset.

From there, the account moves to specifics that the writer believes illustrate ongoing neglect. The father's "ass check" is described as a shade lighter, accompanied by a bed sore and the impression that he had been left wet for long periods of time. While some phrases in the recount are phrased in ways that may feel uncomfortable to readers, the core assertion is clear: the family perceived significant lapses in basic hygiene and moisture management, with vulnerable areas of the body seemingly neglected over extended periods. The family frames these details as evidence of a pattern rather than isolated incidents, emphasizing how the care environment appeared to fail in accommodating his most intimate and essential needs.

The narrative also addresses administrative and scheduling matters that the family attributes to the company's involvement. They claim that the company was hired in January 2025 and that their schedule was changed for the company's benefit rather than to accommodate the client's needs. The language portrays this as a manipulative or self-serving shift, suggesting that the family's time and preferences were deprioritized in favor of the company's operational convenience. This point is used to illustrate a broader sense that the company was prioritizing its own processes over the welfare and rights of the person receiving care.

Another key element concerns the distribution of work and attention among those involved. The writer asserts that the company did more work for a non-client spouse than for the client. In the narrative, this is presented as a critical example of misallocation of staff and resources, implying that the person who most needed care and protection from a professional team was not receiving the level of attention warranted by the situation. The claim is framed as part of a wider pattern of behavior that the family interpreted as disregard for the client's well-being in favor of other relationships or arrangements.

The account also mentions a tangible action taken by the family: purchasing a special device to help clean the father's teeth. They note that the device looks unused, suggesting that the investment did not translate into the intended benefit or improved dental hygiene. This detail is woven into a broader narrative about insufficient engagement from caregivers and a missed opportunity to address one of the father's basic health needs. The implication is that the family sought to compensate for perceived gaps in care through additional tools, only to see little to no impact on the actual care provided.

Throughout the narrative, the family's experience is framed as a troubling mix of serious health concerns, inadequate personal care, and administrative decisions that appeared to undermine the father's welfare. The tone conveys a sense of frustration, disappointment, and alarm at what they perceived as a failure to safeguard their loved one during a vulnerable period. The description of sepsis, malnutrition, wounds, and poor hygiene, coupled with the scheduling and work-allocation complaints, builds a cumulative impression of care that fell far short of what the family expected and deserved.

In closing, the writer's account leaves the reader with a strong impression of disappointment and distrust. The combination of medical risk, visible neglect, and organizational decisions that seemed to deprioritize the client's needs is presented as a coherent, troubling narrative. The family appears to be calling attention to what they view as serious shortcomings, seeking acknowledgment and accountability for the care their father received. The overall portrayal is one of concern for safety, dignity, and proper stewardship of a vulnerable loved one's health.

Places of Worship

• Clothed With Righteousness (4.1 miles)
• Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (4.8 miles)
• Church of Christ (5.2 miles)
• Southern Baptist Convention (5.3 miles)
• St Stephen's Episcopal Church (5.3 miles)
• Victory Tabernacle Baptist Church (5.7 miles)
• True Vine Baptist Church (5.8 miles)

Restaurants

• Deck (4.3 miles)
• Sonic Drive-In (4.5 miles)
• Stacy's Skillet (4.5 miles)
• Southern Fried Rabbit (4.5 miles)
• Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen (4.6 miles)
• Los Reyes Mexican Grill & Bar (4.7 miles)
• Taco Bell (4.7 miles)

Transportation

• Enterprise Rent-A-Car (4.4 miles)
• Circle Bar Ranch (46MS) (7.1 miles)

Physicians

• Pediatrics and Family Practice of Columbia PA (4.4 miles)
• Quality Care Clinic (5.1 miles)
• Hattiesburg Clinic (5.7 miles)
• Columbia Family Clinic (5.7 miles)
• Audibel Hearing Healthcare (5.7 miles)
• Hattiesburg Eye Clinic, P.A. (5.7 miles)
• Pine Belt Mental Healthcare (6.2 miles)

Pharmacies

• Walgreens (4.5 miles)
• Shepard's Discount Drugs (5.8 miles)
• Sav-On-Drugs Of Columbia (5.8 miles)
• Cook & Fortenberry Healthmart Pharmacy (6 miles)
• Fred's Pharmacy (6.3 miles)
• Anderson Drugs (21.3 miles)
• New Pointe Pharmacy (21.3 miles)

Hospitals

• Marion General Hospital (5.1 miles)
• Walthall General Hospital (24 miles)
• Forrest General Home Care & Hospice (24.1 miles)

Parks

• Gardner Stadium (5.2 miles)
• Friendship Park (5.3 miles)

Cafes

• Steam Coffee &Cafe (20.9 miles)
• Conni Cone Snowballs (21.4 miles)