806 East 7Th Street #200, St Paul, MN 55106
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Home Care Givers
Pros
The company shows great potential.- Shane and his team supported families during crises.
- The intake process was simple, and a caregiver was onsite within 48 hours.
- The skilled and professional team was a pleasure to work with during stressful times.
- Shane, Jeremy, and the team are appreciated for all they do.
Cons
They were informed there would be no more help.- There were countless phone calls about not having coverage on certain days.
- They checked on their mom four times that week and never saw anyone.
- The care coordinator has no credentials to speak of.
- The care coordinator says their mom needs a new diagnosis.
- They don’t have the help they need.
- They should not rely on them to care for their loved ones or to be honest about it.
Review
This home care provider is best suited for families facing a sudden caregiving need where speed matters and the plan is to stabilize care quickly while seeking a more durable, long-term solution. The standout is the ability to mobilize fast, intake can be made simple and a caregiver arrives on site in under 48 hours, backed by a team that handles the crisis with evident professionalism. In a pinch, the approach feels pragmatic: a capable caregiver steps in when the family is navigating medical transitions or a key caregiver gap. This is not a luxury service; it is a practical, crisis-responsive option. It proves itself when immediacy is non-negotiable.
Who should consider alternatives? Those who require steadier, predictable coverage over months and who cannot tolerate scheduling gaps should look elsewhere. The pattern that emerges from mixed experiences, notice of no more help, gaps on certain days, and inconsistent caregiver visits, triggers caution for ongoing support. If the plan calls for continuous 7-days-a-week assistance, or if confidence in the care coordinator’s credentialing and decision-making is non-negotiable, a different agency with stronger scheduling guarantees, clear escalation paths, and transparent staffing credentials should be pursued.
From the positives, the primary advantages are quick intake, near-immediate caregiver deployment, and a professional, compassionate mindset from the core team. Those strengths matter most when a family is navigating a crisis, a discharge, or a sudden change in care needs; they reduce initial stress and buy time to arrange more stable supports. The on-site caregiver presence within 48 hours is a practical hedge against weeks of institutional or unstaffed gaps. Yet these assets only partially offset the most consequential drawbacks: inconsistent coverage, uneven scheduling, and questionable care coordination. In other words, the quick-response capability does not automatically translate into reliable, long-term service.
On the negative side, the service demonstrates what can go wrong when continuity and trust are not built into the operating model. Recurrent reports of no coverage on certain days, repetitive phone calls without concrete solutions, and a care coordinator who seems to lack credentials raise legitimate safety and reliability concerns. The allegation that a mom’s diagnosis was challenged underscores the risk when staffing decisions and clinical judgments sit outside a solid, verifiable process. For families, these patterns create a fragile framework: relief in a crisis, but brittleness in routine care.
To protect against misalignment, prospective clients should demand clarity and enforceable guarantees before committing. Ask for a written care schedule with firm days and times, a documented backup plan for absences, and direct contact information for a supervising clinician or administrator. Verify credentials of the coordinator and all assigned caregivers, request routine progress notes, and insist on a formal care plan that can be reviewed and revised. Run a short trial period with defined milestones, and insist on a termination clause if agreed service levels aren’t met. Finally, check references and review any service agreements for cancellation terms.
Bottom line: this provider excels as a rapid-response partner when immediate, short-term stabilization is the objective, but it falls short for families who require consistent, transparent, long-haul care. If the priority is rapid placement and crisis stability, this option can fill a critical gap; but for ongoing caregiving with predictable staffing, stronger scheduling guarantees and verifiable credentials are essential. Weigh these realities against the family’s tolerance for risk and the senior’s needs, anchoring the choice to concrete service commitments rather than hopeful impressions.
21 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Beauty salon
Cable or satellite TV
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Kitchenette
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Telephone
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Minneapolis-St Paul International (9 miles away)
24-hour call system
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Mental wellness program
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
When to Transition from Assisted Living to Memory Care: Key Indicators, Steps, and Finding the Right Community
Assisted Living and Memory Care: Understanding Their Core Differences
Beyond the Bingo Hall: 50+ Enriching Activities for Seniors in Assisted Living