2437 Rice Street, Roseville, MN 55113
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Arthurs Senior Care
Pros
The extraordinary staff at Arthur’s Senior Care essentially saved his life.
The facility is sparkling clean, bright, and welcoming, with sunlight and daily deer visits.
The staff treat residents with kindness, gentleness, and dignity.
The staff have become dear friends to the resident and family.
The home offers healthy, home-cooked meals and comprehensive care on site.
Families receive daily updates and easy communication with the staff.
Arthur’s is an exceptional place and highly recommended for those needing more than assisted living care.
Cons
The price is very high.
The change to a residential-only shop upsets people.
It is wrong to take this away from the public.
Review
Arthur’s Senior Care in Roseville is best suited for families confronting high-acuity needs, particularly dementia care or post-hospital recovery, who want a warm, home-like environment with highly attentive staff and strong care coordination. The setting is bright, clean, and intimate, with a emphasis on comfort, dignity, and daily support. Loved ones who benefit from consistent routines, readily available on-site services (such as PT/OT and hair appointments), and clear, ongoing communication will find this community especially compatible with their expectations for personalized care.
However, this option is not the right fit for every budget or every care level. The strongest caution is the price tag: several families describe Arthur’s as “very expensive,” a reality that can make it difficult for budget-conscious families to justify the monthly cost if the resident does not require dementia-level supervision or intensive post-acute care. For residents whose needs are more routine assisted living with moderate supervision, alternatives that deliver solid care at a lower price point should be seriously considered. Additionally, changes to on-site amenities, such as a beloved public space becoming a restricted, residential-only venue, can disrupt the sense of open, community-centered living that some families value.
The strongest selling points lie in the staff and the care philosophy. Across reviews, caregivers are described as kind, compassionate, and dedicated, with a tangible respect for residents’ dignity. The care teams are praised for their ability to assemble and coordinate medical services, rehabilitation, and daily living supports into cohesive care plans. Families appreciate the ease of obtaining updates, daily status reports via text, reducing anxiety for relatives who cannot be present daily. This combination of compassionate hands and organized care management creates a reliable safety net, especially for those navigating complex medical needs.
Dementia care, in particular, emerges as a standout strength. The facility is portrayed as exceptionally well-suited for memory care, with intentional programming, careful symptom management, and routines that help residents feel secure. The environment reinforces this strength: homes are described as bright and welcoming, with a level of attention to comfort that minimizes distress. The integrated approach, where nurses, aides, and care coordinators work in concert, appears to translate into meaningful, visible benefits for residents living with dementia, reducing confusion and supporting consistent progress.
The principal drawback, cost, requires careful weighing against the demonstrated benefits. For families where dementia care and post-acute recovery are the primary objectives, the premium pricing can be justified by outcomes, safety, and the quality of attention provided. Still, transparency around pricing is essential: prospective residents should insist on a detailed breakdown of what is included, what incurs extra charges, and how services are scaled as needs evolve. The sense that community values can be affected by policy changes, such as restricting access to a space once enjoyed by the public, should be weighed against the overall experience; for some, such changes can erode perceived value and complicate the decision.
In practical terms, families considering Arthur’s should enter with a decision-focused plan. Request a formal care assessment that outlines dementia-specific or post-acute goals, and ask for concrete staffing ratios and shift coverage to understand daily consistency. Compare the pricing structure against other Roseville options, including what services are bundled and what costs could emerge later. For those who prize high-touch dementia care, transparent communication, and a nurturing, home-like setting, and who can absorb the price, Arthur’s Senior Care stands out as a compelling, high-value choice. For those with tighter budgets or less intensive needs, it remains prudent to explore alternatives that deliver strong care at a more attainable price point.







Beyond the Bingo Hall: 50+ Enriching Activities for Seniors in Assisted Living
Understanding the Distinctions: Assisted Living and Memory Care Explained
Guiding Elderly Parents Who Refuse Assisted Living: 6 Practical Steps