6000 Chaska Road, Shorewood, MN 55331
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of The Pillars Of Shorewood
Pros
Shorewood Landing is very nice, with an outstanding location and all the services residents need.- The staff show genuine kindness and concern toward residents.
- The Pillars of Shorewood Landing is an outstanding place for aging parents, with thoughtful, attentive care.
- The dining options are delicious, and there are many activities that make residents feel at home.
- The building is well maintained, bright, and offers amenities like a salon and a movie theater.
- The staff communicate well with families, keeping them informed and reassured.
Cons
They describe the facility as abusive and neglectful due to untrained staff and too few caregivers. - They recount their grandfather spending days in bed, completely soiled, with caregivers failing to respond promptly.
- They report staff sighing and walking away when residents fall, and nurses not providing timely assistance.
- They claim their loved one is covered in cuts, bruises, blisters, feces, and urine, and is completely unsafe.
- They state the facility prioritizes money over safety, with billing being the primary concern.
- They describe unsanitary conditions, including a disgusting room, feces in the bathroom, and dishes left around.
- They warn others not to bring a loved one there, calling it unsafe and the beginning of a painful, lonely end.
- They note a constant urine smell in the memory care unit and staff on phones instead of assisting residents.
Review
The Pillars of Shorewood Landing is best suited for families seeking a newer, well-appointed campus in Shorewood that blends independent living with accessible assisted options, all within a warm, community-oriented environment. The location near Lake Minnetonka, bright common areas, and a palpable sense of staff and resident camaraderie make it practical for couples or siblings who want to age in place together without disruptive moves. For families prioritizing transparent, proactive management and a program that couples dining, social activities, and memory-care elements on one campus, this community is a strong match. It appeals to those who want dependable engagement from staff and a setting that feels more like home than a clinical residence.
Those who may want to consider alternatives include families with heightened sensitivity to care quality or past experiences with neglect allegations. Several reviewers describe grave concerns about neglect and unsafe conditions, raising questions about frontline staffing, supervision, and day-to-day care. For residents with complex medical needs or advanced dementia requiring unwavering clinical oversight, a facility with a longer track record of stable, highly-trained clinical teams may be a safer bet. Price sensitivity, a desire for a quieter environment, or a preference for a different layout or pricing model can also steer families toward nearby options with distinct governance or service structures. If leadership stability and consistent care are non-negotiables, this site warrants careful comparison with alternatives.
Key pros that recur in favorable evaluations include the campus’s modern, inviting design and the seamless integration of independent and assisted living, which minimizes disruptive moves. The community radiates warmth: staff and residents often come away with a sense of genuine kindness, and families report strong, ongoing communication that helps them stay engaged in their loved one’s daily life. Dining receives praise, and the central spaces, a dining hall, a salon, shared activity areas, and outdoor options, support ongoing social engagement and autonomy. The memory-care environment is described as bright and cheerful, which matters meaningfully for families seeking continuity of care with familiar routines. Overall, these elements can create a stable, home-like daily experience that many families value.
Yet the experience is not uniformly positive, and the more serious concerns cannot be ignored. Reviews citing neglect, inadequate supervision, and unsafe conditions are compelling reminders that a facility’s atmosphere can shift with staffing changes. Turnover in management and frontline staff has been noted, with implications for continuity and responsiveness. Memory-care areas have at times carried odors and cleanliness issues, while specific design and maintenance elements, such as accessibility at the entrance, kitchen controls, and flooring transitions, pose real-day challenges for walkers and wheelchairs. A busy highway location compounds safety and convenient access considerations, and some families report frequent staffing gaps during weekends. These factors demand objective, up-to-date verification before committing.
When weighing the positives against the negatives, the Pillars offers tangible advantages that can offset many day-to-day needs, provided operations stay steady and well-staffed. The integrated living model, strong sense of community, and proactive family communication align with what many families want for dignity, autonomy, and safety. The campus’s proximity to services and social amenities supports sustained engagement and reduces isolation, while the memory-care pathway remains a meaningful option for evolving care needs. However, the gravity of reported safety and oversight concerns cannot be dismissed. Prospective residents should validate current staffing levels, care planning, and supervision practices, request direct access to caregivers, observe routines, and review recent incident logs and licensing documents to gauge whether conditions align with the strongest reviews.
In practical terms, The Pillars of Shorewood Landing is a strong fit for families seeking a newer campus with an integrated care model, a welcoming environment, and robust social programming, provided diligence confirms stable operations and safety. It rewards those who value proximity to services, a lively community, and staff who actively engage families. Potential buyers should reserve time to tour, meet direct caregivers, and request candid discussions about turnover, safety protocols, and care planning. If a loved one has highly specific safety needs or if willingness to tolerate variability in service quality is limited, exploring nearby alternatives with demonstrated, steadier staffing and fewer red flags is prudent. Ultimately, an in-person assessment paired with current licensing data and firsthand observations will determine whether Shorewood Landing lives up to the expectations set by its strongest reviews.
130 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Air-conditioning
Beauty salon
Cable or satellite TV
Computer center
Dining room
Fitness room
Fully furnished
Gaming room
Garden
Housekeeping services
Kitchenette
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Private bathrooms
Restaurant-style dining
Small library
Telephone
Wellness center
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Minneapolis-St Paul International (17 miles away)
Community operated transportation
12-16 hour nursing
24-hour call system
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Medication management
Mental wellness program
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Concierge services
Planned day trips
Senior Transition Services: Understanding Their Role, Cost, and Importance
Exploring the Path to Senior Living: A Comprehensive Look at Independent Living and Assisted Living
Is Assisted Living Deductible on Your Taxes? Understanding the Complexities of Assisted Living Expenses and Deductions
