The Homestead at Anoka Costs & Pricing
The Homestead at Anoka offers competitive pricing for its residents, particularly when compared to both Anoka County and the broader state of Minnesota. For instance, a studio at The Homestead is available for $1,540 per month, significantly lower than the county average of $3,460 and the state average of $3,617. Similarly, the one-bedroom units are priced at $2,175 - just slightly above the county's rate of $2,102 yet considerably less than the state figure of $2,893. The two-bedroom accommodations are offered at $2,950, which aligns closely with the state average but remains higher than Anoka County's average cost of $2,671. Overall, The Homestead at Anoka provides an appealing option for individuals seeking quality living arrangements while benefitting from more affordable rates compared to many alternatives in the area.
| Floor plans | The Homestead at Anoka | Anoka County | Minnesota |
|---|
| Studio | $1,540 | $3,460 | $3,617 |
| 1 Bedroom | $2,175 | $2,102 | $2,893 |
| 2 Bedrooms | $2,950 | $2,671 | $2,955 |
Assisted Living communities with a similar price nearby
-
About the same
Abiitan Mill City
$1,537 to $2,396 / month
17.1 miles away
-
from +$164 / mo
SummerWood of Plymouth
$1,704 to $3,945 / month
14.1 miles away
-
from +$155 / mo
Cardigan Ridge Senior Living
$1,695 to $3,250 / month
18.0 miles away
-
from -$90 / mo
Bel Rae Senior Living
$1,450 to $3,500 / month
11.9 miles away
-
from -$110 / mo
Seven Hills Senior Living
$1,430 to $2,780 / month
22.1 miles away
Overall Review of The Homestead at Anoka
common
26 reviews mention this
Staff care is often praised
Residents and families often describe the staff as kind, helpful, and attentive.
Many reviewers talk about staff being kind, cheerful, and responsive, including nurses and assistants who take time to listen and help. Several people describe therapy teams and nursing staff as supportive during transitions, rehab, and hospice-related stays. A smaller set of reviews disagrees, saying communication can be poor and help may be delayed, but even in those comments families describe staff as a key factor in the experience.
common
19 reviews mention this
Clean, updated spaces matter
A clean, modern environment is a frequent reason people feel comfortable visiting or staying.
A number of reviews focus on the building looking clean and updated, with modern or spacious rooms and an overall well-kept feel. Some reviewers also mention cleanliness during rehab and long-term stays, along with staff being accommodating when families have questions. Others raise concerns about cleanliness or sanitation in specific situations, but the overall cleanliness theme shows up repeatedly across positive and negative notes.
common
11 reviews mention this
Activities drive daily engagement
On-site activities and entertainment help residents stay socially engaged.
Several reviewers describe enjoying activities such as entertainment, movies, bingo, music, crafts, and scheduled outings. Families also mention social connection as a meaningful outcome, including residents meeting friends and participating more than they did at home. A few critiques still focus on care delivery rather than the activity program, so the activities theme generally reads as a consistent strength.
caveat
24 reviews mention this
Staffing and call response vary
Multiple reviews describe delays getting help, especially for urgent needs.
A recurring concern is that residents can wait a long time for assistance, including when using call buttons or when physical help is needed. Several reviews connect these delays to understaffing, poor communication between departments, or difficulty reaching nurses when families advocate. Diabetic care and medication timing show up in the negative feedback as well, including missed checks or late administration in some accounts. While some reviewers say nursing and therapy were attentive, the volume of complaint-focused stories makes staffing and responsiveness the biggest risk to weigh.
caveat
18 reviews mention this
Dining quality is mixed
Food quality and dining experience are uneven across reviews.
Some residents and families praise the food, including “good” meals or better-than-expected dining, and a few mention enjoying dinners with other residents. Others describe cold or barely edible food, meals that are difficult to eat, or that food quality does not match expectations. There are also mentions of dietary handling and mealtime logistics, with some reviewers saying they had to manage meals or request improvements. Overall, dining reads as a tradeoff to confirm directly if it matters to your household.
How we summarize
Counts show how many written reviews mention each theme; a review can touch several themes, and only frequently mentioned themes are displayed.