Pheasant Ridge in Albertville, MN

Senior living communities with a similar price nearby

• from +$75 / mo

  The Anthony James

  4.9 from 13 reviews

  $875 to $1,135 / month

  17.6 miles away
• from -$38 / mo

  Oak Crest Retirement Community

  4.9 from 12 reviews

  $762 to $1,019 / month

  21.9 miles away
• from +$139 / mo

  Legends at Silver Lake

  4.6 from 60 reviews

  $939 to $1,178 / month

  23.2 miles away
• from +$100 / mo

  Home Care More Care

  4.7 from 35 reviews

  $900 / month

  19.1 miles away
• from -$41 / mo

  Beacon Hill

  4.5 from 19 reviews

  $759 to $2,135 / month

  24.1 miles away

Pros

• The apartment is very nice and clean.
• The community is lovely, with well-kept grounds.
• The staff are very nice, polite, and courteous.
• Many fellow neighbors are great people, contributing to a strong sense of community.
• Residents love their home.

Cons

• The first apartment hall on the second level smells horrible and has for a year now.
• The reviewer believes a friend was denied on discriminatory terms.
• Management allegedly said the denial was because they’re trying to clean the place up a bit, which the reviewer criticizes as inadequate.
• Heavy odors of weed linger outside the building.
• Albertville is described as a real quiet place with a creepy name that sounds like a horror movie.
• Pheasant Ridge apartments have gotten a lot worse in the last year and a half, from management to staff to a small group of unsavory residents.
• The two apartments they viewed were not what they wanted and had an odor.

Review

Pheasant Ridge in Albertville, MN is best suited for independent seniors and adults who prize a quiet, neighborly atmosphere, well-kept grounds, and courteous on-site staff. When hallways and common areas feel clean and the community carries a calm, residential vibe, this property can deliver a solid, low-stress living environment with a real sense of belonging. It works best for those who want privacy, autonomy, and a friendly neighbor network without the immediate need for in-unit care or assisted living services.

Those who require consistent, predictable management or who are especially sensitive to odors and environmental complaints should consider alternatives. Several reviewers flag persistent hallway odors and weed odors near the building, along with concerns about how management handles problems and admissions. There are also serious notes about discriminatory denial and changes in staff and leadership over the past year or so. For families prioritizing a uniformly clean, odor-free, fully supervised experience, this community may not be the ideal fit.

The positives can be meaningful predictors of satisfaction for the right resident. A quiet setting, well-maintained grounds, and a staff that is described as polite and courteous create a foundation for comfortable, low-stress living. When neighbors are described as great people and the sense of community is strong, daily life can feel stable and pleasant. These factors, if experienced consistently, tavel the line toward a welcoming home where residents enjoy peace, routine, and reliable, friendly interactions with management and neighbors.

Yet the drawbacks land with weight. Reports of odors in the first apartment hall and ongoing outside scents disrupt the first impression and can magnify concerns about cleanliness and upkeep. The narrative about management deteriorating over the last year and the presence of a small group of unsavory residents adds a layer of risk for safety and quality of life. A cited instance of alleged discriminatory denial highlights potential fairness and access issues that can erode trust and complicate the decision-making process. In short, the environment feels stable for those who already belong to the community, but it can feel uncertain or disconcerting for newcomers seeking a consistently smooth experience.

Given these dynamics, a practical decision framework is essential. Prospective tenants should conduct thorough, multi-time unit tours to gauge odor presence, ventilation, and overall cleanliness in different apartments. Direct conversations with current residents about responsiveness to maintenance requests and any changes in building leadership are critical. Inquire about who screens applicants, what grounds are used, and what remedies exist if discrimination concerns arise. Ask for current action plans addressing odor control, the steps taken to manage any problematic residents, and a clear timeline for improvements if management issues are being addressed. These steps help separate routine fluctuations from persistent, systemic problems.

The bottom line is clear. Pheasant Ridge offers a viable option for independent seniors or adults who value quiet, community ties, and well-kept surroundings, and who can tolerate the possibility of odor issues and variability in management. For families prioritizing a consistently odor-free environment, guaranteed proactive problem-solving, and stable governance, exploring alternatives is prudent. The decision should hinge on a candid assessment of personal tolerance for the noted cons, balanced against the appreciated pros, and verified through concrete, on-site vetting, units, common areas, and conversations with current residents, to determine whether this community will truly feel like home.