6194 147Th Avenue, Holland, MI 49423
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Tender Hearts Resthaven
Pros
Resthaven cared for them as if they were their own family.- Resthaven worked as a team with them to provide great care.
- Rest Haven was a good Christian nursing home.
Cons
Katie Faber was very difficult to reach; she would take days to respond and eventually stopped responding.- The service was very disappointing.
- Rest Haven allegedly violated Michigan nursing home laws for 15 months.
- Rest Haven is no longer considered a good Christian nursing home.
- The reviewer moved out after ongoing issues.
Review
Tender Hearts Resthaven in Holland, MI is best suited for families that prize a warm, home-like atmosphere and hands-on, affectionate care. The strongest selling point here is the personal touch from frontline staff, with multiple accounts of caregivers treating residents like family and partnering smoothly with hospice providers to support comfort and daily routines. For families facing the end-of-life journey or ongoing assistance with activities of daily living, Resthaven can deliver a level of emotional warmth and continuity that makes days easier for both residents and their loved ones. This is not a sterile, corporate setting; it is a place where relationships matter and care feels personal.
That said, the community is not the universal fit. Those who require consistently fast, crystal-clear communication from leadership may resist here. One reviewer found the director difficult to reach, with messages left unanswered for days and, in time, contact that stopped altogether. In a care environment where decisions hinge on timely coordination among the facility, external providers, and families, that gap can erode trust at a critical moment. Additionally, families who demand an impeccable regulatory or safety track record should consider alternatives, given a troubling report about possible past regulatory concerns within the facility.
Where Tender Hearts Resthaven excels, the warmth of the care team and the hospice collaboration stand out. The ability of staff to function as a cohesive wraparound resource, coordinating with hospice to support comfort, routines, and emotional well-being, provides a substantial offset to the inevitable challenges of aging in place. For families already engaged with hospice or those who want a facility that embraces a family-centric approach, these dynamics deliver meaningful relief: residents feel seen, and families gain reassurance that their loved ones are not neglected when distance or time pressures mount. In practical terms, those strengths translate into steady daily attentiveness and a culture of kindness that can smooth the transition into supportive care.
Yet the strongest warning in the current feedback is a sense of governance that feels unsafe or erratic. One reviewer described ongoing actions that allegedly violated nursing home norms for an extended period, suggesting serious concerns about compliance, oversight, and accountability. That kind of claim isn’t merely a rumor; it signals potential liability, instability, and risk to residents. Even when care staff are devoted and compassionate, leadership lapses can permeate the resident experience, affecting care planning, response times, and the ability to enforce safety standards. This is a red flag that cannot be dismissed when weighing a placement decision.
Other families counterbalance with positive, steady care that aligns with a Christian, home-like environment. They report caregivers who treat loved ones with patience and respect, and a team approach that integrates well with hospice to deliver comfort and dignity. The reality is that outcomes here depend on the individual trajectory of leadership and day-to-day management. The contrast between perspectives isn’t unusual in settings where turnover, leadership style, and communication practices vary. The bottom line for potential residents is that warm, personal care exists here; the challenge is whether operational gaps can be reliably managed on a resident-by-resident basis.
The practical decision comes down to two hinge points. First, test the administrator’s accessibility before committing, arrange multiple conversations with leadership and observe whether responsiveness improves under pressure or remains slow. Second, investigate the facility’s regulatory history and request current licensure status, incident reports, and a clear process for addressing safety concerns. If warmth, continuity of caregiving, and seamless hospice collaboration are non-negotiables, Tender Hearts Resthaven can be a strong fit, provided leadership issues are actively addressed and a concrete plan is in place to prevent communication gaps. If those conditions cannot be met, exploring other Holland options with more consistent governance and faster responsiveness is prudent, ensuring a safer, more predictable care environment for a loved one.
6 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Cable or satellite TV
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Telephone
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
24-hour supervision
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
Comprehensive Insights into Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and Their Assessment
Guiding Elderly Parents Who Refuse Assisted Living: 6 Practical Steps
Your Comprehensive Guide to Luxury Assisted Living: Elevated Facilities, Amenities, and Costs