336 Grove, Highland Park, MI 48203
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Easley Manor Costs & Pricing
Easley Manor offers competitive pricing in comparison to the broader market in Wayne County and across Michigan. For a studio, residents can expect to pay $2,639 per month, which is significantly more affordable than the county average of $3,495 and the state average of $3,824. The 2-bedroom option at Easley Manor is similarly attractive at $3,705 per month, slightly higher than Wayne County's average of $3,452 but still below the state's typical cost of $3,523. Overall, Easley Manor presents a compelling choice for those seeking quality accommodation without stretching their budget too far in this region.
| Floor plans | Easley Manor | Wayne County | Michigan |
|---|---|---|---|
| Studio | $2,639 | $3,495 | $3,824 |
| 2 Bedrooms | $3,705 | $3,452 | $3,523 |
Assisted Living communities with a similar price nearby
Overall Review of Easley Manor
Pros
Ms. Jones is the sweetest.
The environment is very wonderful.
The place is well kept.
The workers are wonderful.
The management is great.
The complex is very nice and relatively new.
Residents feel safe walking around the complex at night.
The location is very convenient with nearby shops and services.
Cons
The management is very rude and doesnât know how to talk to people.
The management doesnât handle tenant problems or the safety of the complex well, causing prolonged stress.
There was an ongoing mold problem that wasnât resolved promptly due to slow maintenance.
A door leak was never properly fixed; maintenance just mudded over the crack, leading to recurring leaks.
The clubhouse/leasing area can no longer be used by residents, which feels unfair to long-term tenants.
Residents have not received updates on when repairs will be addressed.
A policy change prevented residents from hosting personal events in the clubhouse, such as a college graduation party.
Review
This community is best suited for independent seniors who want a tidy, private apartment with in-unit laundry and the ability to control heat and air conditioning, all in a quiet, safe, conveniently located setting. It rewards residents who value a newer, well-kept building and minimal on-site fuss, and who can tolerate the realities of a mixed management experience. If a long-term residence with predictable maintenance timelines and proactive problem-solving is nonnegotiable, this may not be the ideal fit. The combination of private space, strong safety perception, and easy access to groceries and services makes it a compelling option for those who prize convenience and autonomy.
Conversely, those who need consistently responsive management, and a robust, resident-friendly social calendar, should consider alternatives. Several reviews flag uneven communication from management and delays in addressing maintenance requests, including repairs that drag on for years. For households where clear, courteous interaction with staff and rapid follow-through on repairs are nonnegotiable, a different property with a reputation for proactive on-site leadership will likely serve better. Potential residents should also weigh the loss of certain shared spaces, such as clubhouse access due to past misuse, as a constraint on social life and celebrations.
The strongest positives center on upkeep, safety, and a practical, comfortable living environment. Residents praise well-maintained grounds and clean surroundings, new or newer units, and the personal convenience of in-unit laundry. The ability to control climate inside the apartment adds a clear daily comfort advantage, and the quiet, predictable neighbors contribute to a stress-free living rhythm. Safety is repeatedly noted, with comfortable nighttime mobility and visible local policing giving reassurance. Proximity to Woodward and multiple retailers makes errands and shopping straightforward, reducing daily friction and travel time for active seniors.
However, the reported drawbacks merit serious consideration. References to ongoing mold issues and a stubborn leak near an entryway point to maintenance challenges that can degrade living quality if not resolved promptly. While a roofing professional was engaged, the lack of timely follow-up updates leaves some residents feeling out of the loop about when problems will be fixed. The ban on using the clubhouse for personal or celebratory events shortens opportunities for informal social life, which can be a meaningful trade-off for seniors who value community interaction as much as private space. Any prospective resident should probe current status on repairs and the policy around common-area access to determine how significant these limits may be.
On balance, this property suits self-contained seniors who want a clean, quiet, well-located residence with modern units and autonomous living. The best-case scenario unfolds when maintenance issues are resolved promptly and staff maintain a consistently courteous, transparent line of communication. The clear caveat is that management responsiveness and the handling of long-standing repairs have the potential to color the daily living experience. For families weighing options, this means a careful, current-on-the-ground assessment is essential: visit in person, request a transparent repair log, verify current policies on shared spaces, and confirm how quickly a formal response is provided after a service request. If those elements align with a residentâs expectations, this community can be a well-suited, low-friction home base; if not, it is prudent to look at other options that prioritize stronger on-site management and more open social amenities.









Comprehensive Insights into Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and Their Assessment
Guiding Elderly Parents Who Refuse Assisted Living: 6 Practical Steps
Your Comprehensive Guide to Luxury Assisted Living: Elevated Facilities, Amenities, and Costs