3375 North Linden Road, Flint, MI 48504
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
North Costs & Pricing
In North, the cost of a private room stands at $4,732 per month, which reflects a premium price compared to both Genesee County and the broader Michigan averages. Specifically, this figure surpasses that of Genesee County by approximately $614, where the monthly rate is $4,118. Additionally, it significantly exceeds the state average of $3,675 for a private room in Michigan. This pricing may be indicative of higher regional living costs or enhanced services available in North, suggesting that residents might expect a higher level of care or amenities associated with their accommodation. As such, potential residents and their families should carefully consider these factors when evaluating options in this area.
| Floor plans | North | Genesee County | Michigan |
|---|---|---|---|
| Private | $4,732 | $4,118 | $3,674 |
Assisted Living communities with a similar price nearby
-
from -$782 / mo
Living Waters Buell Lake
$3,950 / month13.0 miles away -
from -$682 / mo
Meadows of Owosso
$4,050 to $5,075 / month18.2 miles away -
from -$237 / mo
Springvale Assisted Living & Memory Care
$4,495 to $5,400 / month8.3 miles away -
from -$582 / mo
Oliver Woods
$4,150 to $4,570 / month21.3 miles away -
from -$682 / mo
Vassar Comfort Care
$4,050 to $4,950 / month23.0 miles away
Overall Review of North
Pros
The facility’s buzz-in security provides peace of mind for residents.- There is no wandering concern at the new facility.
- The staff members are trying their hardest.
- American House offers very good independent housing with spacious apartments.
- They take residents to doctors’ appointments, and there is a chapel and a small theater.
- The rooms are spacious and homey, with a separate kitchen, living room, and bedroom, and some have patios.
- They offer activities and a bus for trips within a ten-mile radius, plus a community dine-in.
Cons
The care, cleanliness, staffing, and food had gone downhill since the management change from American House.- The facility was understaffed and lacked 24/7 medical personnel on site.
- It was marketed as assisted living, but it was not actually assisted living.
- Overall, things had gone downhill across the board.
- The reviewer would not recommend the place to anyone.
- The staff were trying their hardest but were short-staffed because people had been let go, leading to less smooth operations.
- The activity program suffered after removing the activity director, with a young on-site staff member who simply starts a movie and leaves, and there was no popcorn.
Review
Best suited for: North in Flint is a fit for seniors who want a low-maintenance, independent-leaning environment with a basic layer of oversight, rather than a high-touch care plan. The reviews point to a setting where safety and predictability matter, but where the level of on-site medical staffing and daily hands-on assistance may not meet expectations for true assisted living. Families facing rising care needs should proceed with caution. The community seems to work best for residents who prize a quiet, home‑like atmosphere and can navigate daily routines with modest staff support, using outside help as needed. Marketing and actual service levels may diverge, so clarity on what assistance is guaranteed matters before committing.
Those evaluating North should consider alternatives if ongoing medical supervision, robust programming, and clearly defined assisted-living services are non-negotiable. True assisted living often delivers 24/7 on-site medical coverage and more structured activity schedules, which reviews suggest are not reliably present here. For families seeking independent living with richer social opportunities and transportation options, campuses like American House, where independent apartments include kitchens and living spaces, plus community activities and a bus for local trips, may be more satisfying. The key is to contrast what is promised with what is actually delivered, and to validate current operations with direct conversations and a few on-site visits.
On the upside, the concept of North includes tangible safety features and a basic sense of security. Feedback indicates some staff members are genuinely trying, and the environment can feel homey for residents who prefer routine and a slower pace. For residents who want to maintain independence with the option to add services as needed, the setting can deliver a comfortable, uncomplicated baseline. The absence of a high-energy, high-program schedule can be a relief for those who dislike constant activity and prefer a calmer, steadier daily rhythm. In short, there is a calm, predictable core that appeals to a particular subset of seniors.
Where the criticisms land most decisively is in care depth and consistency. Understaffing translates into slower responses, less reliable on-site medical presence, and occasional lapses in housekeeping or operations. Marketing that positions the community as enriched with assisted living can feel misleading if actual on-site care is intermittent or lacks round-the-clock availability. The removal of an activities director and a more transient staff pool can sap the energy residents expect from a community life, reducing opportunities for social engagement, transportation, and purposeful programming. Taken together, these factors create a meaningful mismatch between desired outcomes and delivered services for many families.
Yet the pros and cons do not cancel each other out; they simply tilt the decision toward a careful weighing. If safety, predictability, and the ability to live independently with occasional assistance are the priority, North still offers a viable environment. However, for families where daily medical oversight, prompt responses, meaningful activities, and clearly defined care levels are essential, the cons weigh heavily enough to justify looking elsewhere. The real-world experience described in reviews underlines the importance of verifying the current staffing model, speaking with residents about daily life, and validating how the facility would handle rising care needs.
Practical next steps center on due diligence. Schedule visits at different times to observe staffing during meals and activities, and ask specifically about 24/7 on-site medical coverage and resident-to-staff ratios. Inquire about the availability and quality of programming, transportation to appointments, and consistency of meal service. Engage with several current residents and families to gauge day-to-day satisfaction and problem resolution. Compare North with independent-living options that emphasize strong programming and transportation, and with facilities that guarantee on-site medical support. The decision should hinge on aligning care expectations with what the community can reliably provide, while actively weighing more robust alternatives that better meet escalating needs.
21 resident community capacity
1-bedroom apartments
Assisted Living
Beautician on-site
Cable or satellite TV
Dining room
Full kitchen
Fully furnished
Garden
General store
Housekeeping services
Laundry
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Overnight guests
Party space
Resident parking
Respite or short term stays offered
Telephone
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Bishop (6 miles away)
Transportation & parking
24-hour call system
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Mental wellness program
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Arts and crafts
Book club
Educational speakers / life long learning
Fitness programs
Games
Live musical performances
Religious services
Comprehensive Insights into Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and Their Assessment
Medicare Coverage for Assisted Living: An In-Depth Exploration
Choosing the Right Senior Care: A Detailed Exploration of Assisted Living and Nursing Homes