30000 13 Mile, Farmington, MI 48334
To contact a resident: (248) 252-7760
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Care Assistant Living 2 Costs & Pricing
Care Assistant Living 2 offers competitive pricing for its residents, with monthly costs significantly lower than the averages for both Oakland County and the broader state of Michigan. For a semi-private room, Care Assistant Living 2 charges $2,000 per month, which stands in stark contrast to the county's average of $3,204 and the state's average of $3,191. Similarly, the private room option at Care Assistant Living 2 is priced at $2,500 per month - again more affordable than Oakland County's average of $3,708 and Michigan's average of $3,675. These cost advantages not only make Care Assistant Living 2 an attractive option for potential residents seeking quality care but also underscore its commitment to providing accessible living arrangements without compromising on essential services.
| Floor plans | Care Assistant Living 2 | Oakland County | Michigan |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $2,000 | $3,204 | $3,189 |
| Private | $2,500 | $3,708 | $3,674 |
Senior living communities with a similar price nearby
Overall Review of Care Assistant Living 2
Pros
The staff at Farmington Hills Inn is attentive and kind.
Administrators Marsha and Julie are wonderful and always ready to help.
Families feel they’ve made an excellent decision by choosing Farmington Hills Inn.
The staff are patient, compassionate, and incredibly attentive.
Dorothy receives caring and dignified care at Farmington Hills Inn.
Residents feel safe and thrive under the care.
The facility is warm, welcoming, and spotless, with great food.
Cons
The experience dealing with Farmington Hills Inn was a nightmare for the loved one, with hospital visits, bruises, carpet burns, and feces under nails.
Clothes and shoes were missing, causing anxiety and prompting the family to remove their loved one as soon as possible.
The memory care unit reportedly smelled like sewer, indicating ongoing cleanliness issues.
Employees were seen arguing and nearly fighting in front of residents.
Residents reportedly fell and were not promptly attended to, and some wandered out of the building while staff slept on shift.
The owner and management were accused of neglect and financial exploitation, including concerns about power of attorney and a doctor benefiting from wound care payments.
A reviewer strongly advised against sending a loved one there, effectively saying not to choose this facility.
Review
Care Assistant Living 2 in Farmington Hills is best suited for families seeking a warm, home-like assisted living experience where the standout asset is consistently attentive, compassionate caregiving and a staff-driven sense of security. The community earns strong marks for a caring administration and frontline team that residents and families repeatedly describe as patient, respectful, and genuinely involved. It is a place where residents tend to stay active, engage in a robust activities calendar, and enjoy dining and social opportunities in a clean, well-maintained environment. For families prioritizing peace of mind from visible, hands-on staff and a feeling of everyday warmth, this facility delivers that core promise.
That said, certain families should openly consider alternatives. The reviews reveal serious caveats around memory care, safety, and management responsiveness that cannot be ignored. Prospective residents with significant memory impairment who require constant, fail-safe supervision or a crystal-clear record of incident reporting may prefer a facility with a more transparent safety track record. Those who must rely on spotless safety credentials and a consistently incident-free environment, especially in memory care, will want to explore other options with stronger, verifiable safeguards and clearer escalation processes.
The strongest case for Care Assistant Living 2 rests on the highly positive frontline dynamic. Staff across shifts are repeatedly described as attentive, patient, and kind, with administrators who are accessible and supportive. Families report real-time reassurance from knowing a trusted team is overseeing daily needs, mobility support, medication administration, and personalized assistance. The environment itself reinforces that trust: a clean, aesthetically pleasing building, warm decor, and open outdoor spaces that invite residents outside for fresh air and light activity. The dining experience, tables set, food quality praised, and a sense of consistency, adds to overall well-being and mood for many residents.
Yet the stronger concerns cluster around memory care and safety episodes. A subset of reviews paints a troubling picture: incidents suggesting delays in attention to residents after falls, reports of missing belongings, odor and cleanliness issues in memory care, and confrontations or perceived lapses in management accountability. Some accounts describe dramatic safety failures, residents found in risky situations, conversations about POA and financial matters, and perceptions that leadership may not address concerns promptly. These reports, while not universal, signal real risks that require careful scrutiny. They underscore the volatility that can surround memory care in any setting and the necessity of rigorous due diligence.
For families navigating decisions, several concrete steps can tilt the balance. Insist on visiting the memory care unit at different times, including night hours, to observe staffing patterns and response times. Request current incident reports, recent state inspections, and a robust explanation of safety protocols, including how falls, wandering, and medication issues are tracked and resolved. Ask for direct conversations with administrators about their process for addressing family concerns and for a transparent plan to coordinate care across all shifts. If memory care demands appear high, or if management responsiveness remains uncertain after the inquiry, exploring alternatives with demonstrated, consistent safety records becomes prudent.
In the end, the Farmington Hills iteration of Care Assistant Living 2 offers a compelling package for families who value a genuine, caring staff and a lively, home-like atmosphere. The positives, engaged caregivers, a clean and welcoming campus, tasty dining, and meaningful activities, create a strong foundation for daily life and emotional security. However, the decision hinges on memory care needs and tolerance for potential management gaps. For residents whose care needs are primarily assisted-living with high staff visibility and active engagement, this community can be an excellent fit. For those prioritizing top-tier memory care safety and unambiguous accountability, a measured comparison with alternatives is strongly advised.











Powerful Realities of Elder Abuse and the Most Effective Ways to Report It
Ten Vital Duties of a Senior Caregiver: A Comprehensive Guide
9 Stimulating Memory Activities for Seniors: Puzzles, Cards, and Much More