119 Pingree, Detroit, MI 48202
For more information about senior living options: (844) 490-3973
What level of care are you interested in?

Assisted Living

Memory Care

Independent Living

Skilled Nursing Facility

Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC)CCRC

Other
A broad, passionate portrait of the Greening of Detroit emerges from a chorus of reviews that praise its mission, its people, and the tangible changes it has sparked across the city. The organization is consistently framed as a force for good: a dedicated team of skilled staff who take painstaking care with each tree they plant and every project they undertake. Their work extends beyond reforestation to include urban farming, green initiatives, and a steadfast commitment to educating residents in sustainable practices. The staff's attention to detail and their insistence that the trees they plant will not only take root but thrive under careful stewardship come through clearly in many voices. Those describing experience with the group admire a culture that blends hands-on urban greening with a genuine desire to empower people through education, training, and employment opportunities.
The mission resonates in concrete programs and outcomes. Reviewers repeatedly highlight the organization's role in revitalizing Detroit neighborhoods by creating and maintaining green spaces, as well as its broader educational mandate. Certification programs are singled out as a meaningful route to employability, equipping participants with marketable skills and often leading to job placement or alignment with trade unions. The work is portrayed as more than environmental stewardship; it is a pathway to personal growth, professional development, and improved community well-being. In short, Greening of Detroit is recognized for delivering real, visible benefits to the city, from tree-lined streets to hands-on training that translates into concrete jobs and a sense of purpose for participants and volunteers alike.
Yet, alongside reverence for the good work, there are persistent critiques that challenge the organization's policies and some of its leadership decisions. A central concern is the policy that denies opportunities to individuals with criminal backgrounds, including offenses from many years ago. Reviewers describe this blanket approach as ethically troubling, arguing that rehabilitation, second chances, and the chance to rebuild one's life after paying one's debt to society are essential elements of a just community. The argument made by critics is not that safety should be ignored, but that a rigid exclusion based on long-ago mistakes can undermine the very goals of reducing recidivism and promoting social reintegration. In their view, a more nuanced policy could preserve safety while opening doors for people who have demonstrated change and commitment to a new path, thereby strengthening, rather than undermining, community resilience.
There is a parallel line of critique about how rehabilitation and upward mobility are balanced with the organization's broader mission. Critics contend that true community revitalization requires inclusivity and faith in the potential for human change. They acknowledge the legitimate concerns about safety but argue that policy should not default to permanent punishment. The call is for a forward-thinking stance that aligns the organization's environmental ambitions with a social ethos that expands opportunities for people who have paid their debt to society. The underlying message is clear: when a respected community institution refuses to extend second chances, it risks undermining the very social fabric it seeks to strengthen, and it may inadvertently perpetuate cycles of poverty and marginalization.
Another thread running through the reviews touches on a separate, more contentious incident. Some readers recount an event in which a teenager in the organization's care reportedly faced what was described as traumatizing, embarrassing, and harassing treatment by a judge during a field trip. The writers question why Greening of Detroit did not voice concerns during or after court proceedings and why they did not communicate directly with the parent involved. Instead, they allege that the organization waited for media attention to surface before expressing opposition. The implication drawn by these voices is that the organization's priorities - whether financial interests, partnerships (such as with Dan Gilbert), or public relations - may have influenced its public stance. The critiques here are not only about the incident itself but about transparency and timely, principled communication with the communities they serve. Yet even amid these accusations, there are also notes of praise for the organization's role in supporting civic life and community dialogue, illustrating a complex, sometimes contradictory public image.
Within the tapestry of praise and critique, there are abundant anecdotes of positive personal experiences. Donors are celebrated for their generosity, with reviewers describing how gifts allow thousands of trees to be planted and how trees can be dedicated to loved ones. The impact is visible: a Saturday event yielding seventy trees planted, a testament to sustained community involvement. Many reviewers speak warmly of the organization's ability to mobilize volunteers, support neighborhood projects, and act as a dependable resource for community gardens and greening initiatives. There are testimonials about being inspired, finding opportunities for professional growth, and feeling connected to a larger city-wide mission. Some individuals recount becoming certified tree artisans and even finding pathways into unions, underscoring the practical outcomes of the organization's training programs. The sense from these voices is that Greening of Detroit genuinely empowers people to grow, learn, and contribute.
Nonetheless, practical challenges and organizational friction are also part of the observed landscape. A common refrain is difficulty in establishing reliable contact. Several reviewers report trouble reaching staff at either location, with emails left unanswered and phone lines described as perpetually busy. One message notes an old voicemail from December 2016 that remained active into 2017, underscoring a disconnect between the organization's aspirational mission and its day-to-day accessibility. These logistics concerns temper the otherwise laudatory narrative, reminding readers that even highly regarded community organizations can struggle with communication, responsiveness, and resource constraints. Despite these challenges, many testimonies reaffirm a belief in the organization's good intentions and ongoing contribution to Detroit's urban landscape.
Taken together, the collection of reviews presents a nuanced, multifaceted portrait. The Greening of Detroit is portrayed as an organization with a deeply meaningful mission, a track record of tangible environmental and educational impact, and a team of dedicated staff committed to careful, thoughtful greening work. At the same time, the critiques remind us that the path to broad, inclusive community revitalization is not without tensions. Policy interpretations regarding reintegration and criminal history, questions about transparency and public advocacy, and practical hurdles like communications and resource limitations all point to areas where the organization could grow. If Greening of Detroit can balance its admirable environmental achievements with a robust commitment to inclusion, transparent governance, and reliable outreach, it has the potential to broaden its positive impact even further. The stories shared by supporters and critics alike suggest a city that values green space, opportunity, and a hopeful future - and a community organization that, with attention to these concerns, can help realize that vision even more fully.
Flowers Community Service in Detroit, MI is a fully-furnished assisted living community that offers a wide range of amenities and care services to ensure the comfort and well-being of its residents. The community features a spacious dining room where delicious meals are prepared and served, taking into consideration any special dietary restrictions.
With an emphasis on providing an engaging lifestyle for its residents, Flowers Community Service offers a variety of activities that are scheduled daily. These activities aim to promote social interaction and physical exercise, enhancing the overall quality of life.
The community also boasts beautiful outdoor spaces and gardens where residents can enjoy fresh air and nature. Accommodations are provided with Wi-Fi/high-speed internet and telephones to keep residents connected with their loved ones.
In terms of care services, Flowers Community Service offers assistance with activities of daily living such as bathing, dressing, and transfers. They also provide medication management and coordinate with health care providers to ensure proper medical attention. Transportation arrangements to medical appointments are available, ensuring that residents have easy access to necessary healthcare resources.
Located in the heart of Detroit, this community benefits from its proximity to various amenities. Residents can find cafes, parks, pharmacies, physicians' offices, restaurants, places of worship, and hospitals within close proximity. This allows for convenient access to essential goods, services, recreational opportunities, spiritual fulfillment, and advanced medical care.
With its comprehensive range of amenities and attentive care services provided by dedicated staff members who prioritize the needs of each resident, Flowers Community Service offers a warm and welcoming environment where individuals can thrive in their retirement years.
Flowers Community Service is located at 119 Pingree, Detroit, MI 48202 in Wayne County, Michigan
Living Well Assisted Living
Detroit, MI
Affordable memory care with on-site amenities and activities.
Living Well Assisted Living costs
Living Well Assisted Living images
Kamper Stevens Apartments
Detroit, MI
Private apartments with full kitchens and baths, handicap accessible, plus indoor common areas.
Kamper Stevens Apartments reviews
Kamper Stevens Apartments images
Alpha Manor Nursing Home
Detroit, MI
Proactive staff addressing issues and available therapy services; family involvement is encouraged.
Alpha Manor Nursing Home reviews
Alpha Manor Nursing Home images
Choosing the Right Senior Care: A Detailed Exploration of Assisted Living and Nursing Homes
Choosing between assisted living and nursing homes involves evaluating emotional and financial factors, with assisted living offering independence and support for daily activities at a lower cost, while nursing homes provide intensive medical care for individuals with significant health needs. The decision is influenced by personal preferences, health status, cognitive function, and varying Medicaid coverage across states.
Understanding the True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025: A Comprehensive Guide
Assisted living in 2025 offers a crucial balance of independence and support for seniors, with costs varying from $2,500 to over $7,000 per month based on factors such as location and care level. Understanding pricing complexities, including regional differences and potential hidden fees, is essential for families to plan financially while ensuring quality care for their loved ones.
Understanding Medicaid Coverage for Assisted Living: A Comprehensive Guide
The guide outlines the complexities of Medicaid coverage for assisted living, highlighting significant state-to-state variations, limited coverage often restricted to personal care services, and the existence of specialized waivers for certain needs like memory care. It advises families to consult local Medicaid offices for options while emphasizing the importance of understanding state-specific regulations and facility policies.