17 Poplar Street Ste 4, Roslindale, MA 02131
To contact a resident: (617) 323-2276
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Priority Home Care Services
Pros
Mr. Leo Fevrier was extremely helpful.
He filed the claims and scheduled the repairs on the same day.
The experience with Priority Home Warranty was very pleasant.
The reviewer highly recommends Mr. Fevrier and Priority Home care Services for prompt handling of the services.
Cons
There were communication challenges because caregivers did not speak English well enough to communicate with the patient.
The company owner appears to underpay caregivers, leading them to ask clients to pay directly even though payment had been made to the company.
The patient's mother was very unhappy with the care.
The reviewer suggests not using this company.
Review
Priority Home Care Services in Roslindale is best suited for households that need rapid, warranty-style handling of home systems and appliances, with a clear emphasis on getting problems addressed quickly through a coordinated, landlord-like service process. The core appeal lies in brisk claim filing and same-day scheduling for repairs, rather than in-depth daily caregiving. This is a practical fit for families that want to minimize downtime of essential appliances and utilities and value a streamlined point of contact who can push repairs through promptly. It is not the obvious choice for those seeking a robust, ongoing in-home care program with highly consistent daily staffing or medical-level supervision.
Those considering alternatives should note that this provider may not meet every family’s caregiving expectations. If daily living assistance requires fluent English-speaking staff, highly predictable caregiver scheduling, or deep continuity of care, other agencies with larger teams and clearer language capabilities are likely to be a better match. Families that prioritize transparent, straightforward billing and a consistently reliable caregiving workforce may find stronger alignment elsewhere. In short, this option suits maintenance-centric needs more than full-service, long-term caregiving.
On the upside, the strongest pro is responsiveness. A standout reviewer highlighted a specific contact, Mr. Leo Fevrier, who filed the claims and arranged repairs on the same day. That kind of proactive engagement can remove significant friction when appliances fail or a freezer starts icing, delivering tangible peace of mind in the moment. The positive experiences show that, when a problem is clearly defined and the goal is to restore function quickly, the service can execute smoothly and leave the client with a practical sense of resolution.
The most troubling concerns center on communication and billing reliability. Feedback points to caregivers who may not speak English well enough to communicate effectively with the patient, creating potential safety and comfort gaps in daily care. More troubling still is a reported billing friction: caregivers being asked to be paid directly even after payments were made to the company, with questions about whether the owner is ensuring proper pay. These issues erode trust and elevate the risk that routine tasks and emotional needs go unmet, especially in households that rely on clear, respectful, and predictable interpersonal dynamics.
When weighing pros against cons, the utility of quick repairs can offset some risks if the household’s primary need is to restore functioning appliances and keep essential systems online. The ability to move fast on claims reduces the chance of extended outages or spoiled food, which are tangible, time-sensitive benefits. However, for families where daily caregiving quality, language compatibility, and transparent financial practices are non-negotiable, the drawbacks are not easily dismissed. The gap between appliance-focused responsiveness and ongoing in-home care reliability is the critical tension to assess.
The bottom line is that Priority Home Care Services occupies a specific niche: efficient, repair-driven support with a lean staffing model that can deliver quick troubleshooter results, but with notable caveats in caregiving communication and payment practices. Decision-makers should foreground their real needs. If rapid repair coordination is the priority and daily caregiving requirements are light or non-English-speaking staff can be accommodated, this provider can be a practical solution. If, instead, the household requires consistent bilingual caregiving, transparent, predictable billing, and steady caregiver scheduling, it is prudent to explore alternatives with stronger alignment in those areas. Inquiries to clarify language capabilities, payment workflows, and caregiver assignment consistency will crystallize whether this option fits or if other providers offer greater overall reliability.









Comprehensive Guide to Blood Pressure Charts for Older Adults: Understanding Normal and High Readings by Age
Financing Long-Term Nursing Home Care Through Social Security: A Thorough Exploration
Essential Knowledge on Pneumonia in Older Adults