The Residence at Whitcomb House Costs & Pricing
The Residence at Whitcomb House offers competitive pricing for its accommodations, with monthly costs significantly lower than both Worcester County and the broader Massachusetts averages. For a semi-private room, residents pay $3,300, which is notably less than the county average of $5,477 and the state average of $5,805. Similarly, the studio apartments are priced at $4,650 - still more affordable than Worcester County's rate of $5,109 and Massachusetts' average of $5,312. This cost structure not only provides an appealing option for potential residents but also reflects a commitment to delivering quality care while being mindful of financial accessibility.
| Floor plans | The Residence at Whitcomb House | Worcester County | Massachusetts |
|---|
| Semi-Private | $3,300 | $5,477 | $5,805 |
| Studio | $4,650 | $5,109 | $5,312 |
Assisted Living communities with a similar price nearby
-
from -$100 / mo
The Bridge At Cherry Hill
$3,200 to $4,950 / month
21.7 miles away
-
from -$150 / mo
The Branches of North Attleboro
$3,150 / month
18.0 miles away
-
About the same
Atria Lincoln Place
$3,395 to $6,595 / month
15.0 miles away
-
from -$135 / mo
The Village at Waterman Lake
$3,165 to $6,585 / month
18.5 miles away
-
from +$100 / mo
Pond Home
$3,400 to $5,076 / month
13.4 miles away
Overall Review of The Residence at Whitcomb House
common
15 reviews mention this
Staff communication and responsiveness
Residents and families consistently describe responsive, communicative staff.
Many reviews highlight that staff are easy to reach and quick to respond, including follow-ups after moves or falls and prompt check-ins. Families also mention regular updates like newsletters and daily emails, and several describe staff as attentive during difficult times. A small number of reviews go the other way, citing communication problems around health needs or care coordination, including concerns about medication getting missed at times.
common
10 reviews mention this
Facility kept very clean
Multiple reviews call out a spotless, well-kept facility.
Cleaning and upkeep come up repeatedly, with residents and families describing the building as spotless, very clean, and well cared for in daily life. Some reviewers also connect that cleanliness to feeling comfortable with the move and trusting the environment. On the negative side, one review cites problems with cleaning a restroom and feeling that care around needs was not handled as expected.
common
5 reviews mention this
Dining quality varies
Dining is described positively at times, but some residents report recent declines.
Several reviews say the food is nutritious and enjoyable, including mentions of good-tasting meals. At the same time, one review reports that food service became less satisfactory after cost-cutting changes, and another says meals are served three times a day. Overall, dining feedback isn’t uniform: some families praise the taste, while others describe it as needing improvement.
common
9 reviews mention this
Activities keep residents engaged
Reviews frequently describe activities that support day-to-day engagement.
Many families mention steady activity programming, including exercise programs, holiday celebrations, and updates on what’s happening. Multiple reviews also describe staff keeping residents engaged through the challenges of the pandemic, with ideas for staying connected and upbeat. One review notes that after an activities director left, activities dropped off, which stands out as the main concern in this theme.
caveat
3 reviews mention this
Pricing feels high to some
Several reviews suggest pricing is a concern, despite some positive value notes.
Some reviewers say pricing increased under new management and now feels pricey. Another review frames pricing more favorably compared with other communities, and a separate review points to care pricing structure as part of why they chose the community. Overall, cost sentiment is mixed rather than consistently positive or negative.
caveat
2 reviews mention this
No memory care unit
One key limitation mentioned is the lack of a dedicated memory care unit.
At least one review expresses a concern about the absence of a memory care unit, worrying about what would happen if dementia worsens. Another review references frequent memory care leadership changes, adding to the impression that memory-care stability is an area to watch. If memory care becomes a future need, these comments suggest it may require planning beyond the current setup.
How we summarize
Counts show how many written reviews mention each theme; a review can touch several themes, and only frequently mentioned themes are displayed.