60 Appeal Lane, Lusby, MD 20657
To contact a resident: (410) 394-3900
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Southern Pines II Apartments LLC Costs & Pricing
Southern Pines II Apartments LLC offers competitive rental rates in the context of both Calvert County and the broader Maryland market. For a one-bedroom unit, residents enjoy an affordable monthly cost of $700, significantly lower than the county average of $2,325 and the state average of $3,904. This stark contrast underscores Southern Pines II's commitment to providing accessible housing options. In terms of two-bedroom apartments, Southern Pines II maintains a rate of $1,190 per month, which aligns perfectly with the county's pricing while remaining considerably more attractive than the state average of $3,497. Overall, Southern Pines II Apartments LLC stands out as a viable choice for those seeking quality living without breaking the bank in an area where rental costs can be considerably higher.
| Floor plans | Southern Pines II Apartments LLC | Calvert County | Maryland |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Bedroom | $700 | $2,325 | $3,904 |
| 2 Bedrooms | $1,190 | $1,190 | $3,497 |
Overall Review of Southern Pines II Apartments LLC
Pros
The apartments are very nice.
The staff is great.
The neighbors are friendly.
Cons
Showers should have been walk-in for seniors.
Review
Southern Pines II Apartments in Lusby, Maryland is best suited for independent seniors who want a clean, attractive living environment, a built-in sense of community, and responsive on-site leadership. The apartments themselves are described as very nice, suggesting strong pride of ownership and a low-maintenance lifestyle that appeals to residents who prefer a straightforward, comfortable daily routine. This community works well for individuals or couples who value approachable management, a calm setting, and a neighborhood atmosphere where neighbors know one another and staff are readily accessible.
Those who require barrier-free accessibility or insist on walk-in showers should consider alternatives. The clearest drawback in the feedback is that not every unit offers a walk-in shower, which can be a deciding factor for seniors aging in place or anyone with mobility challenges. If accessible design is non-negotiable, it’s essential to press for a specific layout or unit configuration, and to explore communities that specialize in universal design or provide broader on-site adaptations. The reviews provide limited information about programming, transportation, or formal medical support, so families seeking a highly structured, care-forward environment will want options with clearly stated services.
The strongest positives are tangible and actionable. The apartments are consistently described as very nice, signaling solid interior quality and an appealing living space. A great staff emerges as a core strength, translating into smoother move-ins, reliable maintenance, and a sense of security that comes from reliable, approachable management. Friendly neighbors round out the experience, contributing to a welcoming social fabric that combats isolation and enhances daily life. In combination, these elements establish a dependable baseline of livability that supports independence while fostering meaningful community connections.
The main con, theç¼ºä¹ universal walk-in showers, does not corrupt the entire value proposition, but it does tilt the calculus for accessibility-minded families. For many prospective residents, the quality of the living space and the warmth of the community will offset this drawback; for others, particularly those with significant mobility needs or caregiving requirements, the absence of barrier-free features can be a non-starter. The lack of detailed information about on-site services or organized activities also means this community reads as oriented toward independent living rather than a full-service care setting. Families should weigh how much independence, social life, and ease of maintenance matter relative to the need for accessible bathing options and planned care support.
Balancing pros and cons, the odds favor Southern Pines II for a broad slice of seniors who value a turnkey, sociable, well-managed environment. The combination of attractive apartments, a proactive staff, and a neighborly atmosphere creates a compelling value proposition for those who want to stay engaged, avoid the burdens of upkeep, and rely on on-site leadership to handle day-to-day needs. The staff’s manner and responsiveness can largely compensate for limited programming, making it easier to settle into a routine that feels both comfortable and secure. In short, this community delivers a practical, experience-driven living option that aligns with independent seniors prioritizing quality of life and community connection.
For families weighing choices, the prudent path is to schedule a visit, specifically assess the accessibility of available units, and ask about any possible renovations or future plans to improve bathrooms. Inquire about on-site services, transportation options, activity calendars, and staffing levels to confirm alignment with expectations. If barrier-free bathing is non-negotiable, explore alternatives; if a warm, well-run atmosphere with strong staff and friendly neighbors meets the senior’s priorities, Southern Pines II presents a solid, credible choice that tends to satisfy a broad range of needs without sacrificing livability.












8 Essential Assistive Devices for Older Adults
Navigating the Financial Road to Nursing Home Care: In-Depth Guidance and Resources
Supportive Employee Benefits That Help Caregivers Attain Better Work-Life Harmony


