5247 Reisterstown Road, Baltimore, MD 21215
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Daisy Group
Cons
The staff are described as horrible, rude, unprofessional, lazy, and sneaky.- Residents, including an uncle, are said to be treated poorly and not fed well; meals are described as cabinet-quality.
- The facility is portrayed as nasty and dirty, with a strong cat-urine smell, not resembling the pictures.
- The Daisy Group is criticized as nothing like the pictures and is not recommended.
- It is described as not a good place to send family, with a zero rating given for the place.
Review
Daisy Group in Baltimore, MD is a community that is best seen as a last-resort option for families operating on a tight budget who are prepared to tolerate serious quality and safety concerns. The profile that emerges from the reviews is one of persistent care and operational failures rather than comforting routines or supportive staff. Leadership is specifically called out as a problem area, with multiple reviewers citing unprofessional behavior and questionably managed expectations under the facility’s administrator. In short, this is a setting to avoid unless no viable alternatives exist.
The most consistent red flags center on staff conduct and environment. Reports describe laziness, rudeness, and a pattern of unresponsiveness that places residents at risk of neglect. Food quality is described as poor, with references to meals that feel improvised or insufficient, which compounds concerns about daily well-being. Cleanliness and ambiance are repeatedly flagged as substandard, including strong odors and a facility that feels neglected. Taken together, these factors create a caregiving atmosphere that undermines dignity, safety, and overall health, not merely cosmetic irritants.
Pros, if any, are few and not convincingly documented in these accounts. The absence of positive feedback or tangible benefits makes it hard to justify staying or moving a loved one into this setting based on what is known publicly. The few potential offsets, such as lower cost or simpler admissions, are not substantiated by the reviews and do not meaningfully counterbalance the core issues of care quality, staff responsiveness, and environmental hygiene. In practical terms, the downsides consistently outsize any unclear advantages, leaving strong doubt about the facility’s ability to meet basic expectations for assisted living.
Families weighing options should explicitly compare Daisy Group against facilities with transparent staffing practices, consistently clean environments, and responsive communication. Key actions include requesting recent state inspection reports, speaking with current residents and their families, and observing a live interaction between staff and residents. Look for evidence of regular, adequately trained staff on site, timely response to call bells, clean dining and common areas, and a management culture that welcomes concerns and acts on them promptly. If these are absent in initial impressions, alternatives should be pursued.
This situation demands a clear decision framework. Safety and dignity come first: are residents being treated with respect, fed adequately, and monitored for changing needs? Cleanliness and odors are nonnegotiable indicators of ongoing quality. Communication matters equally: are concerns acknowledged, plans explained, and progress tracked? Cost considerations cannot excuse chronic neglect or poor oversight. If the current environment signals unresolved issues after a formal tour and frank discussions with staff and leadership, the prudent move is to redirect to other communities with verified records of consistent care, good staffing ratios, and a track record of resident satisfaction.
Bottom line: Daisy Group is not recommended for most seniors, and alternatives deserve serious consideration. For families who must pursue care in a budget-conscious path, a thorough, apples-to-apples comparison with better-rated options is essential. Initiate due diligence with unannounced visits, solicit feedback from multiple residents, and obtain recent inspections and complaint histories to form a complete view. If these steps reveal similar patterns, redirect to communities with proven operational integrity and a demonstrated commitment to resident well-being.
12 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Cable or satellite TV
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Telephone
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Baltimore-Washington International (12 miles away)
24-hour supervision
Activities of daily living assistance
Ambulatory care
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Diabetic care
Incontinence care
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
Intimate 8-resident community offering personalized care with on-site meals, housekeeping, activities, and coordinated medical support.
Exploring the Path to Senior Living: A Comprehensive Look at Independent Living and Assisted Living
Is Assisted Living Deductible on Your Taxes? Understanding the Complexities of Assisted Living Expenses and Deductions
Assisted Living Support for Veterans: A Complete and Detailed Overview
