2029 Little Kitten Avenue, Manhattan, KS 66503
To contact a resident: (785) 537-1065
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Stoneybrook Assisted Living Costs & Pricing
Stoneybrook Assisted Living offers a range of accommodations with competitive pricing in comparison to both Riley County and the broader Kansas market. For those seeking a semi-private room, Stoneybrook's monthly cost stands at $3,195, which aligns directly with the average for Riley County but significantly undercuts the state average of $4,562. The studio option is priced at $5,000, slightly above Riley County's average of $4,204 yet still favorable compared to Kansas's average rate of $4,094. Additionally, for residents who prefer a one-bedroom setting, Stoneybrook charges $5,765 - a premium over both Riley County and state averages of $4,005 and $3,859 respectively. Overall, Stoneybrook provides a quality living environment with costs that reflect thoughtful consideration of local market trends while maintaining high standards of care and comfort.
| Floor plans | Stoneybrook Assisted Living | Riley County | Kansas |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $3,195 | $3,195 | $4,562 |
| Studio | $5,000 | $4,204 | $4,094 |
| 1 Bedroom | $5,765 | $4,005 | $3,859 |
Overall Review of Stoneybrook Assisted Living
Pros
The staff are incredibly loving and caring, with many long-time employees still at the facility.
The memory care unit brings peace of mind and shows residents happy, blossoming, singing, and dancing.
The facility is considered one of the better options and is highly recommended by families.
The memory care unit is awesome, with an excellent, attentive staff.
The building is clean, smells good, and the staff are top notch and genuinely care about residents.
Management and leadership are helpful, patient, and ensure families are kept up to date on care.
Cons
They would not recommend it for a rehab patient.
The nursing staff, techs, or caretakers are slow to answer calls for help, sometimes 20â30 minutes.
The hallways smell of urine and feces.
The resident waited three days for a promised shower, finally receiving one on the fourth day.
There were administration issues and a lack of staff.
There was a medication overdose incident where the resident did not wake up for two days.
Maintenance problems went unaddressed for weeks, such as a closet light left on for two weeks.
Review
Stoneybrook Assisted Living in Manhattan, Kansas is best suited for families seeking an affordable, no-fruss memory-support oriented community where stable, caring staff and a sense of ongoing warmth can carry the day. It works well for residents who benefit from real continuity: long-tenured caregivers, a visible commitment from administration, and a memory care emphasis that allows dementia care to blend with general assisted living without isolating residents. For families evaluating options, this is the kind of place where conversations feel human, and where the perception of genuine affection from staff shows up in daily interactions, meals, and small moments of connection. It is not a luxury or a âhigh-endâ experience, but it is a practical home with a strong community feel and a price point that makes consistent care plausible.
Those who may want to consider alternatives include families prioritizing rapid response times and perfect reliability in daily help. Several reviews flag slow call responses (20-30 minutes), which matters most for residents with frequent needs or medical concerns. A few accounts also raise concerns about odor in hallways, maintenance lapses, and occasional gaps in administration and communication, including difficulty reaching the finance staff. For families where medication safety, strictly medical rehab focus, or tight governance are nonnegotiable, these kinds of administrative and operational caveats warrant caution. Additionally, those seeking a pristine, turnkey facility with minimal wear-and-tear may find the wear around the edges and some dated features less appealing.
The core pros, compassionate, consistent staffing; a strong, welcoming atmosphere; and a meaningful memory care component, tend to offset several drawbacks, but not all. The care staff comes across as genuinely loving, with many reviews noting long-term employees who know the residents well. The memory care unit, in particular, is repeatedly praised as a place where residents regain mood, engagement, andjoy, with accounts of residents singing and dancing who hadnât done so elsewhere. Food quality and variety receive favorable mentions, and families report transparent, regular communication about care. These strengths create a buffer against some operational hiccups, because families feel the people in the building are listening, caring, and capable of adapting to residentsâ evolving needs.
A nuanced picture emerges when the memory care dimension is explored in context. Several families celebrate the decision to relocate dementia care into a more integrated Assisted Living setting, noting that mixing residents has sparked more natural social interactions and less isolation. The sentiment that the memory care team is among the best in the area persists in multiple reviews, and the overall atmosphere, cleanliness, comforting routines, consistent caregivers, gives loved ones a level of peace of mind. Yet there are darker threads: a few reviews describe a facility that has faced administrative turnover and inconsistent enforcement of standards, including a harrowing report of a medication overdose. While some families credit leadership changes with improvements, the memory care stability and educational depth of the staff remain variable from account to account, signaling a real need for prospective families to verify the current leadership trajectory and staffing support.
Operational gaps do surface in practical day-to-day living. Critics point to irregular housekeeping in common areas, a few maintenance delays (such as a closet light left unfixed, or rooms showing wear), and a perception that some departments, particularly finances, may be hard to reach. These factors matter because they color the overall sense of reliability. The strongest testimonials house a consistent narrative of attentive nurses and aides who know the residentsâ histories and preferences; the weaker notes remind that execution still hinges on staffing levels and administrative responsiveness. For families weighing the decision, this means the facility can deliver warmth and meaningful engagement, but the experience may fluctuate with staffing tides and leadership emphasis.
In the end, the practical path forward is clear: this is a viable option for families prioritizing memory-care sensitivity, staff continuity, and cost-conscious care over pristine polish or aggressive rehab pacing. Prospective residents or guardians should approach with a checklist. Arrange to meet the executive director and the care director to hear current staffing levels, turnover, and response protocols; request to review the latest care plans and medication management procedures; ask for a recent sample menu and a tour of the memory care area to assess how training translates into daily interactions. Confirm exact staff-to-resident ratios during peak hours and request specifics on how concerns are tracked and resolved. If immediacy of assistance, ironclad medication safety, and a consistently spotless environment are essential, alternatives with stronger operational control may be prudent. If, however, a warm, engaged community, long-tenured staff, and a proven memory-support track record align with family priorities, Stoneybrook represents a well-justified choice, with the caveat that ongoing diligence is essential to ensure that the current leadership and frontline teams sustain the care standard that many families have come to rely on.




























A Holistic Dementia Care Guide: Effective Strategies for Memory Support
Memory Care Pathways: A Holistic Guide to Dementia Support
Comprehending Evening Confusion in Dementia: Causes, Manifestations, and Support













































