120 Aaron Lane, Baxter Springs, KS 66713
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
The Autumn Place I Costs & Pricing
The Autumn Place I offers competitive pricing for its residents, with semi-private rooms available at $1,800 per month and studio units priced at $2,200. These rates are significantly lower than both the average costs in Cherokee County, which stand at $3,111 for semi-private accommodations and $2,765 for studios, as well as the state average of $4,562 and $4,094 respectively. This makes The Autumn Place I an appealing choice for individuals seeking quality care without the burden of exorbitant expenses, positioning it as a cost-effective option within the local market.
| Floor plans | The Autumn Place I | Cherokee County | Kansas |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $1,800 | $3,111 | $4,562 |
| Studio | $2,200 | $2,765 | $4,094 |
Assisted Living communities with a similar price nearby
Overall Review of The Autumn Place I
Cons
It was not right.
It sent them for blocks to the west.
The picture is not right either.
The location is south of the high school.
Review
The Autumn Place I in Baxter Springs, KS is best suited for seniors who want a modest, budget-conscious assisted living option in a small-town setting. It appeals to families seeking straightforward daily living support without the premium price tag that comes with higher-end communities. The resident profile is a person who can live with a simple routine and does not demand advanced medical care or highly specialized programming. For individuals with higher-acuity needs, complex rehabilitation goals, or a desire for a marketing-standard of flawless information, this community is unlikely to meet those expectations.
Those who may want to consider alternatives are families that value impeccable communication and precise logistics. A pattern in the available feedback points to reliability issues in marketing or information delivery, especially around location and directions. When accuracy in basic details is questioned, it raises concerns about ongoing transparency in service descriptions, billing practices, and care coordination. For families navigating multiple options, communities with stronger reputations for clear, consistent information and more robust care offerings should be compared side-by-side.
The reviews present a clear spectrum: one four-star account suggests there are meaningful positives, likely related to the atmosphere, routine, or perceived value, while a three-star middle-ground and a two-star dissatisfaction signal mixed experiences. The existence of a low rating alongside a higher one indicates that while some residents experience satisfactory day-to-day living, others encounter frustrating gaps. The standout red flag is a reviewer’s complaint that directions and a pictured location were inaccurate, with a sense that getting information wrong undermines trust and the likelihood of smooth onboarding for new residents.
Because the pros are not described in exhaustive detail, the practical takeaway centers on what a family can reasonably expect: a simple, attainable option for local seniors who prioritize cost savings and a calm living environment over luxury or highly specialized services. The four-star voice implies there can be genuine value in what is offered, basic care, predictable routines, and a home-like feel, yet these advantages do not automatically erase the impact of information inconsistencies. In this balance, the main con, information and logistical accuracy, has the power to significantly affect peace of mind for families during the crucial decision window.
Evaluation should be methodical and hands-on. Prospective buyers should insist on a thorough in-person tour, current resident references, and a clear, verifiable address with matching signage and directions. Ask to review a sample week of activities, meal plans, and transportation options, and request to see the most recent care plans for residents with similar needs. Probe staff-to-resident ratios during peak hours and inquire about staff stability and turnover, which can be a telltale indicator of daily reliability. Above all, insist on up-to-date, verifiable information about location, services included in assisted living, and any add-on charges that could alter the true cost.
Bottom line: The Autumn Place I offers a practical, cost-conscious option for Baxter Springs families unwilling to pay premium for comfort and style. It can be a reasonable choice for those who value a simple, local living arrangement and are confident in managing a few information-handling risks. However, for families where exactitude in marketing, directions, and service descriptions is non-negotiable, or for those needing rigorous care coordination and higher-level support, alternatives with stronger demonstrated reliability warrant strong consideration. A disciplined evaluation, rooted in first-hand visits, current resident input, and explicit confirmation of services, will determine whether this community truly fits the specific needs and expectations of each prospective resident.












Assisted Living and Memory Care: Understanding Their Core Differences
Beyond the Bingo Hall: 50+ Enriching Activities for Seniors in Assisted Living
Understanding the Distinctions: Assisted Living and Memory Care Explained