Direct Home Healthcare Inc in Chicago, IL

Pros

• Clarisse is a wonderful, caring wound care nurse.
• The physical therapists are kind, reliable, and professional.
• They treat their patients with respect and provide excellent home health care.
• The caregivers are exceptional—kind, respectful, and attentive to patients’ needs.
• Nashoba Homecare answered the phone promptly and was very helpful.
• Carol, the owner, is resourceful and accommodating.

Cons

• The reviewer reports two employees literally had their mom in tears, indicating poor care.
• The reviewer calls the agency the worst home care agency in Chicago.
• The reviewer is dissatisfied and would not recommend Direct Home Health.
• The reviewer was told they would receive only once-weekly physical therapy, which they believe won’t meet their needs.
• The reviewer states the staff phone is broken, making it hard to reach them.
• The company is described as poorly put together, with visits sent to homes that weren’t scheduled or had wrong dates and times.
• The owner is described as rude and harassing to clients and workers.
• The owner is accused of having staff who steal and take advantage of clients.
• The company is overpriced.
• The reviewer suggests only a small handful of workers are any good.

Review

Direct Home Healthcare Inc is best suited for families seeking highly personalized, at-home clinical care in Chicago. The core appeal lies in hands-on nursing and rehabilitation delivered where the patient lives. Wound care is a clear strength, with dedicated professionals such as Clarisse, whose gentle, attentive approach earns trust in challenging conditions. The combination of skilled nursing, at-home physical therapy and occupational therapy, and caregivers who are described as kind, respectful, and attentive creates a care atmosphere that reduces the stress of medical management for families dealing with complex needs. For households that prioritize clinical competence delivered in a familiar environment, this agency stands out as a capable partner.

That said, this provider is not ideal for everyone. Families that require unwavering scheduling discipline, flawless communication, and a consistently polished administrative process may want to consider alternatives. The service history includes a mix of standout clinical experiences and troubling feedback about logistics and management. Some clients report once-in-a-while gaps in scheduling, difficulty reaching the office, and frustration with how care plans and visits are coordinated. In a market where reliability of contact and timeliness can determine outcomes, these gaps matter. A subset of the reviews also notes disagreements with staff conduct and perceptions of mismanagement, signaling a risk floor that cannot be ignored.

The strongest case for Direct Home Healthcare rests on the clinical pros. The wound care nursing demonstrates depth, compassion, and professional skill, an essential factor for clients with legions of needs who require meticulous attention to a wound, wound vac, or complex dressing. The at-home PT and OT deliver tangible value; therapists are valued for their reliability and the ability to work around family schedules, which is a meaningful win for busy households. Office staff that are described as easy to contact and accommodating can smooth what is otherwise a burdensome process, turning debates about care into clearer coordination. In short, when the need is robust clinical support in a familiar setting, the pros are substantial enough to offset many day-to-day friction points.

However, the cons carry real weight in decision-making. Scheduling slippage and communication hiccups create exposure to missed visits, delayed therapy, or misaligned care plans, outcomes that matter deeply in chronic or post-acute scenarios. A few experiences recount acute dissatisfaction with how concerns are handled, ranging from delayed or inconsistent therapy to perceptions of rude or unresponsive administration. The risk is amplified for families with tight medical regimes or those juggling multiple care teams; continuity becomes fragile when evenings and weekends depend on a phone line that sometimes fails to connect. The reality is that these operational weaknesses can erode trust, undermine otherwise excellent clinical care, and escalate stress during already difficult times.

For families navigating a choice, the practical path is clear. Direct Home Healthcare can be a strong contender for individuals whose top priorities are skilled, compassionate at-home care and responsive therapy services delivered in a home setting. To minimize the downside, insist on a clear care plan with a designated care manager, and request guaranteed continuity: a consistent nurse and therapist team, a written schedule, and explicit escalation steps if communication falters. Ask for proactive scheduling confirmations, and set up a single point of contact for quick updates. If the household cannot tolerate even occasional misalignment in visits, complementing Direct Home Healthcare with an additional coordinator or caregiver network may be prudent. For those who value simplicity and predictability above all, a larger, more structured home health agency could provide the steadiness that this provider occasionally lacks.

The bottom-line verdict is pragmatic: Direct Home Healthcare delivers high-quality clinical care and genuinely compassionate staff, making it an excellent choice for families prioritizing hands-on nursing and at-home rehabilitation. It is less ideal for those who require flawless scheduling and pristine administrative execution without exception. The best-fit patients are those who can tolerate occasional administrative bumps in exchange for superior wound care, dedicated nursing, and reliable therapy at home. Pros offset cons most decisively when a family emphasizes clinical outcomes and personal rapport with caregivers, and mitigates risks through proactive planning, a clear chain of command, and explicit service expectations. In the right circumstances, Direct Home Healthcare becomes a trusted partner rather than a default option.

Pharmacies

• Walgreens (1.3 miles)
• Walgreens (2 miles)
• Walgreens (2.3 miles)
• Walgreens (2.4 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (2.6 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (2.6 miles)
• Walgreens (2.7 miles)

Physicians

• North Shore Physicians Group (1.4 miles)
• Resurrection Medical Center Professional Building (4.5 miles)

Theaters

• AMC Village Crossing Theatre (2 miles)

Parks

• Warren Park (2.1 miles)
• Horner Park (2.9 miles)
• Independence Park (3.1 miles)
• Dubkin Park (3.3 miles)
• Portage Park (3.3 miles)
• Dawes Park (4.4 miles)
• Centennial Park (4.6 miles)

Hospitals

• Swedish Covenant Hospital Cancer Care (2.1 miles)
• Saint Francis Hospital (3 miles)
• Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center (5.8 miles)

Restaurants

• Chick-Fil-A (2.3 miles)
• Superdawg Drive-In (3 miles)
• Little Bad Wolf (3.2 miles)
• Culver's (3.2 miles)
• R Public House (3.4 miles)
• SoFo Tap (3.6 miles)
• Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers (4.6 miles)

Transportation

• Cta (2.5 miles)
• Jefferson Park Bus Terminal (2.5 miles)
• Cta (3.3 miles)
• CTA Jarvis (3.4 miles)
• Cta (4.2 miles)
• Cta (5.2 miles)
• CTA - Belmont (5.5 miles)

Cafes

• Little Beans Cafe (2.8 miles)
• Starbucks (3.4 miles)
• Starbucks (3.7 miles)
• Starbucks (3.8 miles)
• Starbucks (4 miles)
• Starbucks (4.4 miles)
• Starbucks (4.4 miles)