339 East A Taylor Road, Crawfordville, GA 30631
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Jabez Inc A Ga Personal Care Home 2
Pros
The owner treats residents with the utmost respect.- The staff take good care of residents.
- The facility is a wonderful place to live for residents.
- The grounds are absolutely beautiful.
- The staff are fantastic.
Cons
The owner has a horrible attitude.- She is unprofessional and rude to residents and their families.
- She dismisses people, claims to be the owner, and says she doesn’t have time to deal with them.
- She is ignorant and condescending, refusing to acknowledge names.
- There are allegations that she takes advantage of patients by asking for money.
Review
This community is best suited for families seeking a small, home-like personal care setting where the owner is visibly involved in daily oversight and able to respond quickly to concerns. The model works well for an elderly resident who is relatively independent but still benefits from daily supervision, regular check-ins, and a warm, personalized touch. With a compact footprint and a focus on direct staff engagement, it appeals to families prioritizing accessibility to leadership and a intimate environment over institutional size.
Potential residents or families who should consider alternatives are those who require a highly formal, consistently polished leadership experience or strict, transparent financial governance. If governance and communication processes matter deeply, especially around money, contracts, and escalation procedures, this site may feel less predictable. For caregivers who prioritize uniform protocols and a clearly delineated chain of command with multiple, documented channels for issue resolution, exploring other options could save later friction and disappointment.
On the upside, the strongest positives center on personal attention and a respectful, engaged staff. Several accounts describe the owner, Terrell, as someone who treats residents and families with care, actively monitoring issues, and ensuring concerns are communicated promptly. When the owner is present, residents appear to receive direct, hands-on oversight, and staff are praised for taking good care of residents. The small, home-like setting supports meaningful relationships, and there is praise for the grounds and the overall ambiance, which contribute to a sense of well-being for a senior who benefits from a comfortable, navigable space.
However, the negatives are hard to ignore and come from a contrasting experience. One review portrays a troubling pattern: the owner described as having a horrible attitude, with accusations of inappropriate financial pressure and unprofessional, dismissive behavior when inquiries were made. This account paints a risk of inconsistent communication and potential tension between families and leadership. While this single perspective is stark, it cannot be dismissed in a decision meant to protect a vulnerable loved one. The tension described also raises questions about how disputes would be handled, how information is shared, and whether the environment remains calm under stress.
The key pros offset the main cons only when families are comfortable with direct, personal engagement as the primary mode of operation. If quick, multi-channel communication, formalized dispute resolution, and transparent financial practices are non-negotiable, the positives may not fully offset the concerns. Yet for families who value a warm, intimate care setting and can perform due diligence, asking pointed questions, requesting multiple references, and meeting the owner and staff in person, the favorable aspects can carry significant weight. A stable two-year tenure for at least one resident suggests that, for some residents, daily life there remains steady and satisfying.
Actionable next steps are essential. Prospective residents should schedule a thorough on-site visit, observe interactions between staff, residents, and leadership, and request candid conversations with multiple families or residents about day-to-day experiences. Verify policies around payments, debt, and any outside financial obligations to gain clarity. Ask for a clear outline of daily routines, care levels, meal quality, safety protocols, and activity availability. If uncomfortable with leadership dynamics or if the financial conversations raise red flags, consider well-vetted alternatives that offer more formal governance structures. In the end, the decision hinges on balancing intimate, personal oversight and a homelike environment against the certainty of consistent leadership behavior and transparent finances.
24 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Beauty salon
Cable or satellite TV
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Kitchenette
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Restaurant-style dining
Small library
Telephone
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
24-hour call system
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Medication management
Mental wellness program
Special dietary restrictions
How and When Medicaid May Cover Assisted Living Costs
A Detailed Exploration of Assisted Living Medicaid Waivers Across the United States
Comprehensive Residential Support and Assisted Living Solutions for Individuals with Disabilities