613 13Th Avenue, Cordele, GA 31015
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Cordele Intensive Training Residence I Costs & Pricing
Cordele Intensive Training Residence I offers a one-bedroom accommodation at a monthly cost of $4,000, which is notably higher than both the county and state averages. In Wilcox County, the average monthly cost for similar accommodations stands at $2,700, while the statewide figure for Georgia is approximately $3,412. This pricing suggests that Cordele Intensive Training Residence I may provide more specialized services or amenities that justify the premium compared to its local and state counterparts. It's essential for prospective residents or their families to consider not only the financial implications but also the potential benefits of the services offered at this facility.
| Floor plans | Cordele Intensive Training Residence I | Wilcox County | Georgia |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Bedroom | $4,000 | $2,700 | $3,412 |
Assisted Living communities with a similar price nearby
-
from -$400 / mo
Joe Speight Home For Men
$3,600 / month20.9 miles away
Overall Review of Cordele Intensive Training Residence I
Pros
It is a great place.- The staff are very friendly.
- The work is good.
Cons
Son went in for corrections came home in way worst condition.- They took my nephew’s medicine away and refused to give him more until he was seen by THEIR doctor.
- They mandate counseling, yet refuse to council.
- He has also been told numerous times by employees that he was “a privileged white boy.”
- They have taken all his medications away.
- He somehow broke his hand a week ago and the staff called for permission to take him to an Orthopedic to have it set. They have yet to take him so he is sitting there with a broke hand that is not healing properly and no medication.
- If a parent did this to their child they would take the child away and lock up the parent.
- This is a clear violation of his Civil Rights.
Review
Cordele Intensive Training Residence I in Cordele, GA is best suited for families facing a youth who needs a tightly supervised, correction-focused environment and can operate within a juvenile-justice–aligned program. The facility’s structure and oversight appear designed for a resident who benefits from clear rules, regular routines, and external accountability, rather than for a casual or purely therapeutic stay. Families considering this option should understand that the setting emphasizes discipline and compliance within a framework that involves outside authorities, which shapes daily life and decision-making.
Those weighing alternatives should pay particular attention to how this program handles medical care, counseling, and rights protections. If uninterrupted access to prescribed medications, timely medical treatment, respectful treatment free of discriminatory remarks, and consistent rule enforcement are non-negotiable, other residential or therapeutic options deserve close scrutiny. Programs with transparent medical protocols, independent medical oversight, and robust grievance processes may offer greater peace of mind for families anxious about medical and civil-rights protections.
Pros that surface in approached reviews include genuine warmth in some staff interactions and a sense that the team is mission-driven and committed to the resident’s progress. Several comments describe the atmosphere as a “great place” and acknowledge friendly staff and steady work. The presence of external oversight or involvement from the Department of Juvenile Justice, as indicated by at least one review, signals a framework of accountability that can enhance trust in the program’s direction and safety net. In settings where discipline and accountability are the primary currency, these elements can translate into meaningful structure for certain youths.
However, the cons are sharply material and cannot be minimized. The most troubling patterns described involve medication management: medications removed or withheld, delays in obtaining medical care, and reports that serious health issues were left unaddressed. Several notes allege inconsistent rule enforcement and unprofessional remarks from staff, including discriminatory language about race. The combination of medical neglect, civil-rights concerns, and perceived bias undercuts safety, trust, and overall well-being. When families hear that a youth’s hand injury remained untreated for a period, or that medical decisions hinge on internal approvals rather than recognized clinical standards, the risk profile becomes unacceptable for many care goals.
The key question is whether the visible positives can meaningfully offset the dominant concerns. In this case, the friendly demeanor of some staff and the program’s disciplined structure do not fully compensate for reports of medication mismanagement, delayed medical care, and potential rights violations. Structure and warmth matter, but they are insufficient if medical continuity, non-discriminatory treatment, and reliable safety practices remain in doubt. For families already wary of quality gaps, the balance strongly tilts toward seeking options with stronger medical governance, clearer safeguarding policies, and demonstrable outcomes in both behavior and health care.
In deciding whether Cordele Intensive Training Residence I fits, a pragmatic threshold is reached: demand verifiable assurances. Prospective families should insist on written med-management protocols, guaranteed timely medical evaluations, and explicit anti-discrimination training with documented outcomes. Request current residents’ care plans, admission and discharge criteria, and a transparent complaint and escalation process with external review. If these assurances cannot be provided or if independent oversight reveals unresolved gaps, alternatives that prioritize medical continuity, rights protection, and consistent staff professionalism should be pursued. In the end, the strongest move is to align the choice with the non-negotiables: safety, medical reliability, and respectful, unbiased treatment, even if that means passing on this community.
6 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Cable or satellite TV
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Telephone
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
24-hour supervision
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
Funding and Affording Assisted Living: A Thorough Overview
Assisted Living Expenses and Long-Term Care Insurance: A Comprehensive Exploration
Securing Financial Support for Assisted Living: A Comprehensive Overview