Maxim Healthcare

Pros

• Reviewers described the service as excellent and testing as seamless.
• The desk staff were nice and professional.
• The facility was clean, neat, and the personnel were friendly.
• The Test Administrator was helpful, efficient, and friendly.
• The check-in process was fast and the testing area was clean.
• The site was described as very professional with good customer service.
• The overall testing environment was quiet, clean, and well-run.
• One reviewer reported passing the exam and having a positive experience.

Cons

• The smoke detector chirped throughout the exam, disrupting concentration.
• The room's standing air conditioner made the environment extremely cold.
• The proctor's finger-pointing and threat of a lifetime ban felt unprofessional and intimidating.
• The test was canceled without prior notification, and staff were hostile and unhelpful when trying to reschedule.
• A staff member wrongly claimed the sponsor forbade using the provided calculator, indicating a knowledge gap about the rules.
• The facility appeared rundown (roof missing, spiderwebs) and contributed to a poor testing experience.
• The exam experienced technical errors and delays that wasted time and forced relocation.

Review

A broad snapshot of impressions from this testing center reveals a place that many examinees find dependable and comfortable, but with notable pockets of frustration that can color an entire visit. Across a mix of experiences, the staff's professionalism and the facility's cleanliness repeatedly stand out in a positive light. Numerous testers describe the environment as quiet, orderly, and convenient, with fast check-in and a generally friendly atmosphere. In several reviews, testers emphasize that the people at the desk or the test administrator (TA) were courteous, helpful, and efficient, and they appreciate that the center can feel calm and professional even when a high-stakes exam is on the line. A number of individual messages celebrate small, concrete positives - the welcoming sign-in process, the clean and quiet rooms, and the smooth testing experience that leads to successful results.

Yet, attached to these positive experiences are a number of complaints that illustrate how fragile a comfortable testing environment can be when certain conditions go awry. One tester recalls a steady chirping from a smoke detector during an exam, which proved disruptive despite attempts to muffle the sound with earplugs. The reviewer notes that the two women at the front desk were nice, but the noise problem tainted what should have been a straightforward testing session. This kind of environmental issue - the intersection of equipment at fault and the tester's focus - makes it clear that even small disturbances can have an outsized impact on test performance and mood.

Policy disputes and proctor behavior also appear in repeated threads. In one account from a September morning, a tester wearing a hooded sweatshirt reported a confrontation with a proctor who pointed a finger in their face and warned of a lifetime ban for hood use. The tester describes feeling furious and stressed, especially since they were in the middle of a lengthy exam and had 100 questions left when the incident occurred. The situation underscored a volatile moment where personal interaction and policy interpretation collided, leaving the tester feeling unfairly treated. Later, the center or sponsor clarified that the sweatshirt over the hood should be permissible, revealing a discrepancy between on-site enforcement and official rules. The tester's sense of relief after the interaction - ultimately passing the exam - still coexists with the memory of that tense moment and the suggestion that staff may not always be aligned with the formal guidelines.

Beyond hood etiquette, another review details a cancellation that felt abrupt and unhelpful. A tester arrived to find that their test had been canceled without prior notice, and was told to "reschedule it on my own." The staff member was described as professional but hostile, leaving the tester frustrated and feeling unsupported. It's a reminder that administrative hiccups can color a tester's entire day, especially when coordination between scheduling, notifications, and on-site execution breaks down.

In contrast to these more troubling episodes, a substantial portion of reviewers describe consistently positive experiences. Several comments highlight the center's cleanliness, quietness, and the unobtrusive but effective facilitation of the testing process. Phrases like "very professional," "great environment," and "couldn't ask for a better testing atmosphere" recur, sometimes in the same paragraph as a specific success - passing a certification exam or receiving helpful guidance from the test administrator. One tester singled out a friendly sign-in staff member and a courteous computer check-in, noting that the overall experience was "clean, quiet, and very good," culminating in a passing score on a CompTIA exam. Another reviewer praised the testing atmosphere as "professional," "efficient," and "friendly," with a TA who was "helpful, efficient, and friendly" and a facility described as clean and quiet.

A notable thread concerns policy clarity, especially around permitted test materials such as calculators. One tester reported being told they could not use a calculator provided by the center due to sponsor restrictions, which contrasted with the tester's sponsor's stated policy that any calculator should be allowed. The center claimed adherence to sponsor rules, while the tester maintained that their sponsor allowed the use of any calculator. The tester even noted that their sponsor had never encountered such a restriction before. An update indicated the owner's stance - that they must follow sponsor rules - yet the tester reiterated their sponsor's contrary guidance. This back-and-forth underscores a broader need for consistent, well-communicated policies and written confirmations to prevent last-minute disputes during check-in.

In another mixed-to-negative vignette, a tester described a visit that included severe physical discomfort and a chaotic testing environment. They arrived early, found a room with structural issues (a portion of the ceiling missing and spiderwebs), and then experienced an exam error that necessitated relocation to another room. They described an adjacent loud system and buckets of water, and after a long wait they were told to contact Pearson VUE with a case number. The tester's sense was that the building was in need of remodeling, and the overall experience felt squandered by avoidable logistical problems. This is a stark contrast to the more polished experiences reported elsewhere and highlights how facility maintenance can dramatically affect a tester's impression of a center.

Taken together, the reviews sketch a center that can be a reliable, convenient option with professional staff and a clean, quiet environment - factors that many test-takers value highly. The same pool of reviews, however, reveals real vulnerabilities: occasional environmental noise or temperature issues, tense or unclear interactions with staff, administrative missteps, and policy ambiguities that can escalate stress during high-stakes assessments. Most reviewers come away with a sense that the site is capable of delivering a solid testing experience, especially when things run smoothly, but the mixed experiences emphasize the importance of consistent policy enforcement, transparent communication, and diligent maintenance. For prospective test-takers, the takeaway is to plan for contingencies - ask about room conditions, confirm policy details in writing, and allow a little extra time for check-in and potential service interruptions - so that a routine exam day stays focused on performance rather than preventable frustrations.

Located in College Park, Georgia, this neighborhood offers convenient access to a variety of amenities for seniors. With several physicians located within a short distance, medical care is easily accessible. There are also a number of restaurants nearby, providing a range of dining options. Transportation options include the Korean Air and ATL Airport Gate T3 for those looking to travel, as well as various pharmacies for medication needs. In terms of healthcare, there are hospitals such as Labor & Delivery and Southern Regional Health System close by. For recreation, parks like Creel Park and Forest Park Recreation & Parks offer outdoor spaces to enjoy. Additionally, there are places of worship nearby for spiritual fulfillment. Overall, this area provides a mix of services that cater to the needs of seniors considering senior living in College Park.

Physicians

• Kids Avenue Pediatrics (0.2 miles)
• Omni Eye Services (0.3 miles)
• Peachtree Orthopaedic Clinic (0.3 miles)
• Burnett Jettie M MD (2.5 miles)
• Malloy, Tyrone Dr - Malloy Tyrone C MD Jd (2.5 miles)
• Atlanta Heart Associates (3.6 miles)
• Atlanta Ropheka Medical (3.7 miles)

Restaurants

• McDonald's (0.3 miles)
• Blue Moon Brewhouse (1.7 miles)
• Popeye's Louisiana Kitchen (1.7 miles)
• McDonald's (1.7 miles)
• Chicken + Beer (1.8 miles)
• Chick-Fil-A (3.3 miles)
• Brake Pad (3.3 miles)

Transportation

• Korean Air (1.1 miles)
• Runway 9R/27L (1.3 miles)
• ATL Airport Gate T3 (1.6 miles)
• Runway 9L/27R (1.6 miles)
• Delta Sky Club (1.7 miles)
• South Terminal (1.7 miles)
• South Baggage Claim (1.7 miles)

Cafes

• Starbucks (1.8 miles)
• Starbucks (4.4 miles)

Pharmacies

• Walgreens (2.4 miles)
• Walgreens (3.4 miles)
• Heart Pharmacy (3.6 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (4 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (4.1 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (4.2 miles)
• Walgreens (4.9 miles)

Hospitals

• Labor & Delivery (3.9 miles)
• Southern Regional Health System (3.9 miles)

Parks

• Creel Park (4.1 miles)
• Forest Park Recreation & Parks (4.5 miles)

Places of Worship

• East Point Church (4.3 miles)
• New Macedonia Baptist Church (5.1 miles)