2208 E 138th Ave, Tampa, FL 33613
To contact a resident: (813) 978-0819
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Shady Oaks Retirement Home
Pros
Luz and Francis are amazing, with wonderful hearts and are always available to assist families and their residents.- The staff, including Luz Dejesus and Frances Torres, are the best and truly care about people, maintaining very good relationships with the residents.
- Meals are prompt and nutritious, Bingo board games are provided, and the supervisor is truly engaged with residents.
- The facilities are clean and the assistants on duty are friendly.
- Staying there offers a nice experience with nice people.
Cons
The facility is not run very efficiently, according to a reviewer, who would give it no more than one star.- A reviewer notes that Mr. Fredrickson was supposed to show up a long time ago, implying unreliability.
- Another reviewer expresses uncertainty about the place, suggesting a negative overall impression.
Review
Shady Oaks Retirement Home in Tampa is best suited for residents who prize personal warmth from a small, neighborly staff and value accessible, relationship-driven care over formal, glossy systems. Families that want a community where front-line workers and managers appear genuinely invested in residents’ daily comfort will find the strongest fit here. The environment rewards steady companionship, predictable routines, and straightforward services, meals on schedule, activities that include familiar favorites like bingo, and a clean, orderly setting. In short, the core appeal is interpersonal: care teams that know residents by name and respond with a ready, friendly presence.
Those who should consider alternatives are families seeking ironclad operational efficiency, scrupulous scheduling, or advanced medical oversight. A notably described concern is that the site isn’t run very efficiently and that promised arrangements can lag, suggesting variability in management responsiveness. For loved ones who require highly consistent service, punctual visits, or industry-standard benchmarks for staffing, this community may not meet expectations. Also, families pursuing highly structured medical monitoring, complex care plans, or reputational assurance of flawless execution should evaluate other options.
On the plus side, the staff profile stands out. Luz DeJesus and Frances Torres are repeatedly praised for compassion and availability, with families noting real warmth and strong relationships with residents. The supervisor’s engagement with families signals a level of oversight that helps bridge gaps between care and home life. Meals are described as prompt and nutritious, an important practical touch for ongoing health and satisfaction. Activities like bingo provide social stimulation without turning care into cookie-cutter routines. Clean facilities and friendly assistants on duty reinforce a sense that the place is cared for and orderly, which matters when trust is a deciding factor.
However, the negatives are not cosmetic. At least a couple of reviews question efficiency and reliability: plans or visits promised long ago did not materialize, and one account bluntly states it would not earn more than a one-star rating. That kind of feedback points to potential gaps in scheduling, communication, and overall administrative smoothness. One review mentions a seven-month timespan without a clear trajectory, which can be unsettling for families trying to coordinate transitions or daily support. While these voices can be isolated, they illustrate a real risk that experiences vary by shift, staff on duty, and moment-to-moment management.
The key question becomes whether the strong, person-centered care can offset operational rough edges. For residents who derive comfort from consistent staff relationships and the everyday reliability of meals and clean surroundings, these positives often carry significant weight. The caring temperament of front-line staff and the visible supervisor attention can translate into a safer, more reassuring atmosphere, even when processes stumble. Yet that offset is not universal: for those requiring strict timetables, seamless coordination of services, or flawless execution, the drawbacks may loom larger and erode confidence over time.
Bottom line: Shady Oaks suits a specific profile, loved ones who value warmth, attentiveness, and a home-like feel over corporate polish. It is less ideal for families prioritizing unimpeachable efficiency and uniform performance across days and shifts. Prospective residents should prioritize conversations about response times, staff consistency, and care planning, and should visit with questions about scheduling, admissions, and daily routines. If those factors align with a preference for relationship-driven care and a clean, welcoming environment, Shady Oaks offers a credible, genuinely caring option in Tampa; if not, alternatives that stress operational discipline and structured oversight merit serious consideration.
Assisted Living
Activities on-site
Devotional services off-site
Indoor common areas
Tampa International (9 miles away)
Ambulatory care
Diabetic care
Meals provided
An Extensive Exploration of the VA Aid and Attendance Benefit
Senior Transition Services: Understanding Their Role, Cost, and Importance
Exploring the Path to Senior Living: A Comprehensive Look at Independent Living and Assisted Living