525 Maricopa Drive, Kissimmee, FL 34758
To contact a resident: (407) 932-1481
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Ace Care Assisted Living Costs & Pricing
Ace Care Assisted Living offers competitive pricing for its services compared to the broader market in Osceola County and the state of Florida. For a semi-private room, residents pay $1,900 per month, significantly lower than the county average of $2,833 and the state average of $3,009. Similarly, the cost for a private room at Ace Care is set at $2,500, well below both the county's average of $3,702 and Florida's typical rate of $3,699. This positioning not only makes Ace Care an attractive option for families seeking quality assisted living but also demonstrates its commitment to providing accessible care without compromising on service or comfort.
| Floor plans | Ace Care Assisted Living | Osceola County | Florida |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $1,900 | $2,833 | $3,009 |
| Private | $2,500 | $3,702 | $3,699 |
Overall Review of Ace Care Assisted Living
Pros
The staff are professional.
The Director Edith Muniz is cordial.
The facility is kept clean.
The staff are wonderful and very helpful.
They would definitely recommend this facility to others considering placing their loved ones.
Cons
The place is like a cheap motel.
There is no place for visitors to sit, so they have to sit among the residents, which is very annoying.
The food menu for breakfast, lunch and dinner is scant.
There are no activities for residents besides a TV showing the same game show every day.
An assistant spoke to visitors in a belligerent manner and told them to get off the domino table.
The facility is described as a last resort for placing a loved one.
The overall experience was absolutely awful.
Review
Ace Care Assisted Living in Kissimmee is best suited for families seeking a budget-conscious option that prioritizes cleanliness and dependable basic care over robust programming or upscale amenities. This community tends to work for residents who are comfortable in a quiet, low-activity environment and for families willing to supplement with outside involvement if desired. The facility appears to deliver on a clean, orderly living space and on the presence of staff who can be cordial and professional in some moments, but it does not consistently deliver lively engagement or hospitality as a core feature. In short, it fits a niche where cost and basic routine matter more than social programming or dining variety.
This is a facility where alternatives should be considered for any family prioritizing meaningful daily activities, varied dining options, and consistently respectful, well-trained staff interactions. Reviews indicate a wide gap in experience, from highly praised staff to complaints about belligerent conduct and uneven service. Families who need an active calendar, plenty of visitor-friendly common spaces, and a reliably positive dining atmosphere are likely to be disappointed here. Prospective residents should be prepared to supplement care with outside programming or to search for a home that prioritizes engagement and warmth as part of daily life.
On the plus side, the property is reported to be clean, with some staff described as professional and helpful and with at least one director noted as cordial. A few reviewers highlight moments of strong care in practice, and there are occasional social touches, a few small gatherings, a birthday party here and there, and a Saturday prayer service, that provide structure for residents who do not expect a full activity slate. In these moments, staff competence and attentiveness can shine through, offering reassurance to families that basic comfort and safety are being attended to.
However, the most consistent red flags revolve around activity depth, dining, and visitor experience. The dining options are described as scant by multiple accounts, and the overall menu appears insufficient for appetites or dietary variety. Programs beyond a TV routine and occasional games are sparse, leaving residents with limited stimulation and limited opportunities for social connection beyond casual interactions with staff. Visitor logistics also suffer, no dedicated seating for guests and, in at least one incident, a staff member’s belligerent response to a visitor created friction and concern about how guests are treated. Such experiences color the overall sense of the place, especially for families weighing generous engagement against cost.
From a decision-making standpoint, the strongest trade-off is clear: strong cleanliness and basic care versus inconsistent programming and variable staff interactions. For families that can tolerate or compensate for limited activities, and who value a straightforward, low-cost option with predictable spaces and routines, Ace Care can be a reasonable fit. Yet the cons tend to overwhelm for those who want a lively living environment, a consistently respectful culture, and reliable, high-quality meals. The gap between the best and worst experiences here hinges on staffing consistency, food quality, and the depth of daily engagement offered to residents.
The practical takeaway is to approach with a plan. Schedule a thorough visit, talk directly with administration about meal plans, daily activity calendars, and staff turnover, and request to observe a meal and a group activity. If the resident requires regular, meaningful engagement, a strong dining experience, and confident, courteous staff interactions across shifts, alternatives should be explored in the Kissimmee area. Ace Care may serve as a last-resort cost-conscious option for those who can tolerate sparse programming and variable service, but for families seeking warmth, vibrancy, and predictable, high-quality care, more robust communities deserve consideration.









Supportive Employee Benefits That Help Caregivers Attain Better Work-Life Harmony
Top Cars for Senior Drivers and Essential Safety Innovations
A Closer Look at Private Pay Home Care