3881 NE 3rd Ave, Oakland Park, FL 33334
To contact a resident: (954) 563-0276
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Treemont On the Park
Pros
The staff are always great to residents and visitors.
They are consistently accommodating for residentsā needs and treat everyone like family.
Treemont on the Park is described as becoming like family to residents and their families.
There is little turnover in staff, reflecting the professionalism of the staff and owners.
The care and concern shown by the staff is exceptional, with residents feeling safe and well cared for.
The facility provides engaging activities and keeps residents mentally active without overwhelming them.
The property is well maintained and clean, with a safe and welcoming environment.
Cons
This place is not only a dump but dangerous.
They don't take care of residents, miss medicate them and lie to families about their loved ones' status.
The facility is filthy, with stained outdoor furniture, water bugs in bathrooms and patient rooms, and a smell of urine throughout.
Their patients are kept very drugged up and soiled, with no activities to keep them mentally engaged.
The place is very expensive for the level of care provided.
The reviewer regrets placing their dad in their care and would not recommend the facility.
Review
Treemont On the Park is best suited for seniors and families who prize a warm, caregiving-forward environment where staff stability translates into genuine relationships. The best endorsements come from long-tenured teams and residents who feel safe, valued, and treated like family. In particular, aging in place and hospice or Alzheimerās care are framed as strengths by families who have watched consistent staff invest time in meals, daily routines, and meaningful moments. For those who want a place where the caregiving culture remains constant over years, this community can deliver a sense of home that outlasts many other facilities.
Those who should consider alternatives are families with hard lines on cleanliness, medical oversight, and robust activity programming. A portion of reviews paints Treemont as plain or outdated and raises serious red flags about upkeep, odors, and environmental condition. Concerns surface about the presence and quality of licensed medical staff, with anecdotal assertions that patients are heavily medicated or not adequately supervised. If a sharp focus on pristine facilities, visible clinical leadership, and a wide variety of structured activities is non-negotiable, other communities should be explored. In short, Treemont rewards warmth and continuity but can fall short on the standards some families expect in daily surroundings and medical rigor.
The strongest positives lie in the human side: staff consistently described as caring, attentive, and available, with very little turnover. Families recount that residents feel seen, safe, and well-cared-for, and that staff members are quick to engage and monitor wellbeing. The sense of belonging, together with a courtyard setting that encourages outdoor time, helps residents settle in and reduce agitation or anxiety. Even when programming is described as not overbearing, there are affirmations that activities exist that keep minds and bodies engaged. For families prioritizing a home-like atmosphere and dependable caregivers, these are powerful counterweights to the ordinary stresses of placement.
However, the negative voices cannot be dismissed. Several reviews allege unsafe conditions or neglect, including reports of dirty environments, unpleasant smells, and outdated interiors. Some critics claim programs are sparse, with little to no meaningful activities beyond holidays, and others question the presence and engagement of licensed nurses or registered professionals. The juxtaposition of strong family care against allegations of improper medication practices and restricted oversight creates real tension for decision-makers who must weigh comfort and companionship against clinical assurance and environmental dignity. Those with experiences leaning toward the latter concerns will want to scrutinize staffing, maintenance, and daily routines before committing.
The core way the favorable elements balance the drawbacks is in the value of continuous, compassionate caregiving. For residents who thrive on trusted faces, predictable routines, and a caregiving culture that extends into family life, the positives often outweigh the imperfect physical environment. The consistent staff can mean fewer disruptions for residents who rely on familiar aides and caregivers for daily care, meals, and safety monitoring. Yet the risks tied to cleanliness, odors, and questions about medical oversight are real enough to warrant proactive verification: request current details about RN coverage, ask for recent inspection reports, and arrange visits during regular hours to observe housekeeping, meal service, and staff-resident interactions. If these checks align with expectations, Treemont can be a sound choice for aging in place with a strong human touch.
Bottom line: Treemont On the Park is a pragmatically good option for families prioritizing enduring relationships, emotional warmth, and aging-in-place care over a polished facility veneer. It is less ideal for those who demand pristine environments, highly transparent clinical oversight, and broad, structured activity programs. Prospective buyers should go in with a clear checklist: meet the administrator, tour common areas and resident rooms, confirm RN and medication practices, observe meal and activity routines, and review current inspection or licensing records. When warmth and continuity are the deciding factors, Treemont delivers. When pristine surroundings and aggressive clinical governance are non-negotiable, it is wise to keep eyes open and explore additional options.









How and When Medicaid May Cover Assisted Living Costs
A Detailed Exploration of Assisted Living Medicaid Waivers Across the United States
Comprehensive Residential Support and Assisted Living Solutions for Individuals with Disabilities