427 West Cheyenne Road, Colorado Springs, CO 80906
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Life Quality Homes II Cheyenne Home Costs & Pricing
Life Quality Homes II Cheyenne Home offers a range of room types at competitive prices relative to both Teller County and the broader Colorado market. The monthly cost for a semi-private room is $4,600, which positions it slightly above the county average of $4,481 but remains more affordable compared to the state average of $4,009. For those considering a one-bedroom option, Life Quality Homes II is priced at $4,800 - this is notably lower than the county average of $5,276 while still being higher than Colorado's overall average of $4,119. Lastly, the private room rate at Life Quality Homes II stands at $4,900; this again reflects a reasonable choice when juxtaposed with Teller County's average of $4,465 and aligns closely with the state's benchmark of $4,142. Overall, Life Quality Homes II presents appealing financial options for prospective residents seeking quality care in a supportive environment.
| Floor plans | Life Quality Homes II Cheyenne Home | Teller County | Colorado |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $4,600 | $4,481 | $4,008 |
| 1 Bedroom | $4,800 | $5,276 | $4,118 |
| Private | $4,900 | $4,465 | $4,142 |
Memory care communities with a similar price nearby
-
from +$900 / mo
Freedom Home Assisted Living
$5,500 to $6,500 / month12.4 miles away -
About the same
MacKenzie Place Colorado Springs
$4,635 to $6,095 / month5.1 miles away -
from +$300 / mo
MorningStar Assisted Living & Memory Care at Mountain Shadows
$4,900 to $6,575 / month7.5 miles away -
from -$505 / mo
The Retreat at Sunny Vista
$4,095 to $7,570 / month4.0 miles away -
from +$380 / mo
Sunrise at University Park
$4,980 to $6,390 / month7.7 miles away
Overall Review of Life Quality Homes II Cheyenne Home
Pros
The staff are amazing.- The four Constant Care locations are clean and show love and care.
- The atmosphere is wonderful and inviting; the staff are helpful and polite.
- The resident-to-staff ratio is excellent.
- Constant Care is a great home for loved ones.
Cons
The management is extremely rude and disrespectful.- They deny access to personal employee files and speak to staff as if they were dirt on the bottom of their shoe.
- Crystal, the house manager, is inconsiderate of staff feelings and trash talks other employees to certain people within the company.
- They do not take acts of physical abuse seriously and keep the same employees who have harmed residents.
- If someone wants their loved one to be surrounded by constant drama and abuse, this is definitely the place for them.
- The care director prioritizes giving her friends more hours over others and is very rude, loud, and unprofessional.
Review
This community is best suited for families seeking a smaller, home‑like assisted living environment where daily life centers on personal attention, warmth, and a clean, inviting atmosphere. It rewards residents who thrive on intimate interaction with caregivers and neighbors, where staff-to-resident contact is frequent and visible. The setting appeals to those who value a calm pace and a sense of family among residents, with an emphasis on comfort and routine over institutional formality. It is a good fit for seniors who can tolerate some administrative variability in exchange for strong front-line care and a consistently welcoming environment.
Those considering alternatives should note that the strongest caution is around administrative tone and accountability. If a family requires uniformly professional, transparent leadership and a clear, responsive system for handling concerns, this community may not meet that standard. Families with heightened safety requirements, past experiences with abuse, or a need for rigorous, external oversight will likely want to explore other options. In short, if governance quality and consistent policy enforcement are non‑negotiable, it pays to keep looking.
On the plus side, the most enduring advantages center on bedside realities: staff who show dedication, a clean and cared-for environment, and a genuinely inviting atmosphere. The resident‑to‑staff ratio feels favorable, enabling more meaningful interaction and engagement in daily activities. The small‑scale nature of the home supports a sense of familiarity, making it easier for residents to settle in and for families to observe how care unfolds on a day‑to‑day basis. These strengths can translate into meaningful quality of life, especially for residents who value predictable routines and close relationships with caregivers.
The most troubling themes come from concerns about management behavior and consistency. Several reviewers describe a pattern of rude or disrespectful communication from administrative figures and a reluctance to address problematic staff conduct or safety issues. There are pointed remarks about favoritism in work hours and a perception that accountability for abuse or harm has not always been demonstrated. These factors threaten resident safety and staff morale, and they can undermine the otherwise solid frontline care by eroding trust in the administrative layer. In practical terms, ongoing governance issues risk a decline in care quality if not actively corrected.
For families evaluating this option, a clear decision framework helps. First, verify current leadership stability and their responsiveness to concerns, ideally through a direct conversation with the administrator and by speaking with frontline caregivers. Request transparent information about incident reporting, staff training, and accountability procedures, plus concrete examples of how the home handles safety disclosures. Seek out current residents or families for candid feedback about how concerns are addressed, and ask for metrics on turnover and hours worked by caregivers. If governance measures are solid and staff care remains strong even when cameras are watching, the positives may justify the tradeoffs.
Overall, the community presents a mixed but real opportunity. The compelling, homey environment and strong frontline care can deliver meaningful daily quality of life for the right resident. Yet the red flags surrounding management behavior and oversight cannot be dismissed, because they directly affect safety, consistency, and trust. Families who want a high degree of governance transparency and straightforward accountability should either press for concrete improvements or consider alternatives with a cleaner track record in administration. For those willing to stay actively involved and insist on ongoing governance reform, this option can work; for others, exploring other communities with steadier leadership may prove the wiser, safer path.
6 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Board and Care Home
Memory Care
Respite Care
Cats allowed
Dogs allowed
Cable or satellite TV
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Private
Telephone
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
City of Colorado Springs Muni (7 miles away)
24-hour supervision
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Hospice waiver
Incontinence care
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Mental wellness program
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
Dementia-Related Hallucinations: Causes, Experiences, and Practical Approaches
Illuminating Insights About Alzheimer's Disease: Ten Crucial Realities
A Thorough Discussion of Medications Potentially Linked to Dementia Risk