443 Old River Drive., Vallejo, CA 94589
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
The Highlands Care Home II Costs & Pricing
The Highlands Care Home II offers competitive monthly rates that stand out when compared to both Solano County and the broader California region. In particular, residents seeking semi-private accommodations can expect a monthly cost of $1,500, significantly lower than the county average of $2,762 and the state average of $3,333. Similarly, for those interested in one-bedroom options, The Highlands Care Home II charges $2,000 per month - a notable reduction compared to the Solano County's average of $3,750 and California's statewide average of $4,340. This pricing structure positions The Highlands Care Home II as an appealing choice for individuals seeking quality care at a more accessible price point.
| Floor plans | The Highlands Care Home II | Solano County | California |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $1,500 | $2,762 | $3,333 |
| 1 Bedroom | $2,000 | $3,750 | $4,340 |
Overall Review of The Highlands Care Home II
Cons
There is false advertising.- There are reports from Social Services regarding a Type B Citation.
- The facility is understaffed.
- Daily activities are zero; residents have to be picked up and taken out, otherwise they sit and watch TV.
- The meals are not nutritious and the diets prescribed by the doctor are not being prepared.
- Family members constantly drop off meals, pick up medications, and perform tasks that caretakers should handle under the contract.
- The furniture and carpet are outdated; there isn’t enough space for guests, making visits unpleasant.
- For what is being charged, more should be offered and provided.
- Their father fell and hurt his leg and knee and was not taken to be seen or given an X-ray.
- Their father’s $500 electric chair, sent with him, is broken and they are expected to repair it or have it repaired.
- There is a warning to thoroughly research before placing loved ones in a care home.
Review
The Highlands Care Home II in Vallejo presents a troubling profile for anyone seeking reliable, attentive senior care. It is best viewed as a last-resort option for families with very limited alternatives and with a strong preference for basic shelter over structured care. In practical terms, this community may only satisfy situations where a resident’s needs are minimal beyond a safe room and a place to sleep, and where family members are prepared to provide meals, medications, and transportation to appointments. Even then, the fit is fragile, because the core expectations around activity, nutrition, and safety appear unmet in the available feedback.
Those evaluating the facility should explicitly consider alternatives the moment daily engagement, medical responsiveness, and respectful treatment are non-negotiables. The reviews signal a misalignment with essential services: insufficient staffing, no daily activities, and a reliance on family members to shoulder tasks that belong to professional caregivers. Any senior who requires mobility assistance, timely medical attention, or meaningful daytime programs should steer toward options with verifiable staffing ratios and active programming. Families should not accept vague assurances when social services flags compliance concerns that touch on resident safety and well-being.
There are virtually no clear pros evident in the feedback that would meaningfully offset the dominant cons. If a reader has to articulate a potential upside, it would have to hinge on low emotional or logistical demands from the resident’s side or a very favorable location for family access. However, the reviews emphasize that even basic value is undermined by chronic understaffing, inattentive care, and a lack of adherence to prescribed diets. In this scenario, any perceived affordability or convenience is overshadowed by persistent care gaps and safety risks.
The primary drawbacks are concrete and cumulative. Understaffing translates into caregivers who appear stretched thin, with zero daily activities to fill a resident’s day beyond passive TV viewing. Nutritious meals and doctor-prescribed diets are reportedly not prepared, forcing families to drop off meals and medicate independently. The environment itself feels cramped and dated, with outdated furniture and limited space for visitors, which can compound the sense of isolation. A serious safety lapse is evident in the reported incident where a resident fell and was not promptly evaluated, followed by a lack of timely medical attention. Equipment concerns, such as a family-provided electric chair needing repair, further underscore a culture where resident needs are not consistently prioritized.
From a decision-making standpoint, these factors collectively raise significant risk. The combination of no formal activity program, insufficient clinical oversight, and safety incidents signals a facility where neglect and frustration can escalate quickly. Prospective families should weigh the inevitable emotional and logistical burden of constantly compensating for gaps with what the contract promises versus what is delivered in real practice. The risk calculus strongly favors exploring higher-performing alternatives that offer reliable staffing, structured programming, nutritious meals, and demonstrable safety records.
Actionable next steps are clear. Schedule extended in-person visits, focusing on the staff-to-resident ratio during peak hours, the quality and timing of meals, and the availability of meaningful activities. Request recent inspection or citation reports and follow up on any Type B findings with the licensing agency to verify current status and remediation efforts. Directly address safety concerns, carefully observe how falls are handled, how quickly medical questions are answered, and how medications and special diets are managed. If long-term care is non-negotiable, build a contingency plan that includes a clear pathway to a facility with verifiable staffing, ongoing meals prepared to dietary specifications, and a robust activity calendar that keeps the resident engaged.
6 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Board and Care Home
Memory Care
Respite Care
Cable or satellite TV
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Telephone
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
24-hour supervision
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
Memory care specialization with competitive pricing versus county/state averages.
22 Remarkable Caregiver Support Groups Available Online and In-Person
Understanding Medicaid Coverage for Assisted Living: A Comprehensive Guide
How and When Medicaid May Cover Assisted Living Costs