1245 Crescendo Drive, Roseville, CA 95678
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Silvana Senior Care 2
Pros
The family expresses lasting gratitude for the care received during a difficult transition.- The home is described as welcoming, clean, bright, and uplifting.
- Krisztina, the owner, is noted as responsive, understanding, and knowledgeable.
- The staff are described as well trained and highly organized.
- The food is described as delicious and made from scratch.
- Silvana Senior Care is considered an excellent choice for board and care; the staff are excellent and the owners are kind.
Cons
The facility is understaffed to save money.- The staff could not be reached during a critical moment when the reviewer’s mother was taking her last breaths.
- The owner argued about the schedule, hindering timely attention.
- The reviewer warns not to trust Sutter agencies.
- The reviewer felt they were talked into choosing the location by a Sutter-recommended agency.
Review
Silvana Senior Care 2 in Roseville is best suited for families seeking a warm, home-like board-and-care setting where the owner is hands-on and residents receive highly personalized attention. The environment is described as welcoming, clean, bright, and uplifting, with a strong emphasis on open, responsive communication from Krisztina, the owner. Residents benefit from a homelike atmosphere, meals prepared from scratch, and staff who are portrayed as well trained and organized. For families prioritizing intimate, relationship-driven care over a large, impersonal facility, this community presents a compelling fit.
Those who should consider alternatives are families needing higher staffing ratios, continuous nursing oversight, or specialized memory-care programs within a larger campus. The recurring caution in the reviews centers on understaffing as a cost-saving measure, which can translate into slower responses during urgent moments. Prospective buyers should recognize that a small, owner-led setting can deliver remarkable warmth, but it may also expose gaps in coverage during peak times or crises. Additionally, there is a caution about relying on external placement agencies for referrals, with risks that the on-site experience may not fully align with expectations set by outsiders.
The strongest pros, personalized attention, a responsive owner, and a well-trained, organized staff, meaningfully offset some of the con’s weight when the care plan is clear and well-communicated. The owner’s direct involvement tends to translate into consistent communication, accountability, and a sense of trust that staff will stay aligned with each resident’s preferences. The emphasis on home-cooked meals and a clean, inviting setting reinforces the feeling that residents are valued and comfortable. In practice, this can translate into smoother daily routines, better morale, and fewer mood-altering strains for family members who crave transparent oversight and visible affection from caregivers.
However, the most impactful caveat remains staffing discipline. One review highlights a moment when attention to a family member’s health needs was compromised by staffing gaps and a scheduling dispute with the owner. That account should not be dismissed; it signals a real risk if staffing levels, shift coverage, or crisis responsiveness are not solidly secured. Prospective families should probe carefully about caregiver-to-resident ratios, shift patterns, on-call coverage, and the precise steps for urgent situations. In addition, verify how care coordination is managed across shifts and who has ultimate authority when medical or behavior-health needs escalate.
In practical terms, this community is a strong choice for households that value warmth, dignity, and a clear line of sight into daily care. It suits families who are comfortable with a smaller operation where the owner’s presence meaningfully shapes service quality, and who can tolerate, perhaps even appreciate, a higher degree of flexibility in staffing schedules. For those who require guaranteed nursing presence, rigorous clinical oversight, or a more standardized program, it makes sense to compare with larger facilities that publish staffing metrics and have formal nursing coverage around the clock. The key is to enter with a tight set of questions and a plan to observe the rhythms of care during an on-site visit.
The bottom line is practical: Silvana Senior Care 2 delivers a compelling combination of homey atmosphere, direct-owner engagement, and attentive staff, underpinned by consistently positive qualitative experiences from families. When the priorities are comfort, personal attention, and clear, honest communication, this community rises to the top. The decisive caveat is staffing reliability; that is the dimension to scrutinize before moving forward. If staffing plans align with the resident’s needs and the family’s expectations for timely, respectful care, Silvana Senior Care 2 stands out as a thoughtful, capable option worth selecting.
6 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Cable or satellite TV
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Telephone
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Sacramento International (16 miles away)
24-hour supervision
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
Choosing the Right Senior Care: A Detailed Exploration of Assisted Living and Nursing Homes
Understanding the True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025: A Comprehensive Guide
Understanding Medicaid Coverage for Assisted Living: A Comprehensive Guide