1104 Nottingham Court, Roseville, CA 95661
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Garden Villa Costs & Pricing
Garden Villa offers competitive pricing in comparison to both Placer County and the broader California market. With studio and private rooms available at $3,700 per month, Garden Villa is notably more affordable than the county average of $4,311 for studios and $4,026 for private rooms. It also presents a cost advantage over the state averages, which stand at $4,145 for studios and $3,939 for private accommodations. This strategic pricing not only makes Garden Villa an attractive option for residents seeking quality care but also reflects its commitment to providing accessible living arrangements without compromising on service or comfort.
| Floor plans | Garden Villa | Placer County | California |
|---|---|---|---|
| Studio | $3,700 | $4,311 | $4,145 |
| Private | $3,700 | $4,026 | $3,939 |
Memory care communities with a similar price nearby
-
from +$300 / mo
Sungarden Villa II
$4,000 / month1.9 miles away -
from +$450 / mo
Ferrari
$4,150 to $5,500 / month9.5 miles away -
from -$700 / mo
Love & Care for Elder
$3,000 to $4,500 / month3.8 miles away -
from +$300 / mo
Ashley Villa
$4,000 / month6.3 miles away -
from +$300 / mo
A Bright Future
$4,000 / month5.4 miles away
Overall Review of Garden Villa
Pros
They are great if all you need is a little help.- The facility is pretty clean overall.
- They are all very friendly, and the staff is consistently friendly.
- The value for assisted living is good.
- Preety is incredibly kind.
- The property is nice and gated.
- The caretakers are lovely, attentive, and clearly care about residents.
- The breakfast is fabulous and meals are enjoyed by residents.
- The facility is immaculately clean with no odors.
Cons
They are not a 24-hour memory care facility.- They do not have staff awake 24 hours.
- They attempted to charge more because the resident’s condition worsened and kept the night shift awake.
- They struggled to manage the resident’s incontinence.
- They are not suitable for memory care.
- They struggled to meet the resident’s dietary restrictions despite reminders.
- They offered few activities and limited interaction.
- Their staff is ill-equipped to handle 24-hour memory care.
Review
Garden Villa in Roseville is best suited for seniors who mostly need light assistance and who value a home‑like, low‑drama environment over a campus that markets advanced memory care. The property itself feels comfortably sized, with a layout that supports easy supervision and gentle navigation, and the outdoor spaces offer a pleasant retreat. For residents who require help with daily tasks, medication reminders, or bathing and dressing support, the team tends to be there with dependable, personal attention. The community delivers steady, practical care rather than high‑intensity medical intervention. In short, this is an option for families seeking predictable assisted living rather than a substitute for intensive dementia care.
Those who should consider alternatives are families facing dementia or other conditions that demand 24/7 awake staffing, frequent redirection, or specialized behavioral programming. The reviews consistently flag memory care as outside this community’s wheelhouse, with concerns about nighttime coverage and the ability to handle true, round‑the‑clock supervision. Dietary needs appear to require careful, ongoing coordination, and a robust activities calendar is not a core strength here. If a loved one requires structured cognitive engagement, continuous monitoring, or more aggressive incontinence management, another option with dedicated memory‑care services and a fuller activity program will serve better. Even families prioritizing gentle, respectful care may prefer alternatives if memory support becomes central to care goals.
On the positive side, staff friendliness and warmth stand out as a practical strength. Admin and caregivers are described as kind, attentive, and willing to go the extra mile, and families note genuine care in daily routines such as bathing and sharing meals. The facility is generally clean, the common spaces feel inviting, and meals, especially breakfast, receive praise. The home's larger footprint and private rooms offer dignity and privacy, with medications managed on site and laundry handled by staff, which reduces family burden. These positives help soften the reality that this setting does not deliver the intensity of support some elders require. They also partially compensate for gaps in programming and 24‑hour supervision.
Activity and enrichment, however, fall well short of what many families expect. The reviews point to a sparse calendar and limited on‑site programming, relying instead on occasional outside entertainers, which can leave residents with long, unstimulated days. For residents who thrive on social interaction, structured routines, and engaging, predictable activities, this is a notable deficit. The lack of robust engagement can also impact mood and overall quality of life, even when basic daily needs are met. That said, the property’s quiet atmosphere and familiar routines may suit those who prefer a simple, predictable day. The decision hinges on how much social stimulation is essential to well‑being in addition to basic care.
Operationally, the reviews reveal a staffing model that relies on a single CNA on site at times, with additional help brought in as needed. This arrangement can work for straightforward assisted living tasks but creates strain when more intensive support or nighttime supervision is required. Still, the team tends to handle core duties, medication management, laundry, and daily hygiene, with a patient, caring tone. Dietary restrictions appear to be a challenge, with some difficulty meeting specific restrictions despite reminders. Cleanliness is largely solid, though one reviewer noted room‑level concerns. The combination of limited staffing, modest activity programming, and occasional meal‑planning hiccups makes Garden Villa a reasonable choice for light care, not a comprehensive solution for complex needs.
Bottom line: Garden Villa is a practical, low‑risk choice for families prioritizing warmth, clean living spaces, and dependable assistance for mild needs. It succeeds where many seek a homey atmosphere and straightforward caregiving, but it falls short for residents requiring true memory‑care capabilities, robust daily programming, and 24/7 awake supervision. Pros offset many cons to a degree, yet the gaps are real and cumulative. Prospective residents should schedule a thorough visit focused on staffing patterns, dietary accommodations, activity schedules, and the availability of external care supports. Ask about respite stays to test fit, and probe whether a memory‑care option can be layered in if needs evolve. In the right circumstances, Garden Villa can be a steady, comforting home, just not the fullest spectrum memory‑care solution.
6 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Board and Care Home
Memory Care
Respite Care
Cats allowed
Activities off-site
Bath tubs
Beautician on-site
Cable or satellite TV
Devotional services off-site
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Indoor common areas
Move-in coordination
Outdoor common areas
Private
Private bathrooms
Telephone
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Sacramento International (18 miles away)
24-hour supervision
Ambulatory care
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Diabetic care
High acuity care
Incontinence care
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
Understanding the Distinctions: Assisted Living and Memory Care Explained
How to Communicate with a Loved One Living with Dementia: 10 Supportive Strategies
Comprehensive Guide to VA Nursing Homes: A Crucial Long-Term Care Resource for Veterans