Denver Court Home

Pros

• They were very attentive and explained the doubts very well.
• The staff were very helpful and polite.
• The government offices are here to help people.
• The facility offers easy access.

Cons

• It is claimed that judges do not follow their own laws and side with the police regardless of evidence.
• The court is described as biased and corrupt, with poor accountability for officials.
• Clerks are described as rude and unhelpful, frequently hanging up on callers and denying access to supervisors.
• Small claims is criticized for allowing attorneys, which is alleged to be illegal and unfair to non-attorneys.
• Judge Samra Furbush is accused of routinely consulting with the defense counsel of a large company, compromising fairness in small claims.
• The building is described as dirty and poorly maintained, with no janitorial service.
• Wait times are extremely long, making the process a waste of time and money.
• Court staff are accused of misinformation and hindering access to legally available information.
• There are allegations of racism and discriminatory conduct by Commissioner Belinda Handy, with claims of favoritism toward business interests over ordinary people.
• Overall, the courthouse is described as a joke and not truly trustworthy.

Review

A chorus of experiences paints a mixed and often tense picture of several California courthouses, with Riverside and Corona facilities featuring prominently. Across dozens of reviews, patrons describe a landscape of frustration, inconsistency, and sometimes alarming encounters, punctuated by a few positive notes about courteous staff or clearly explained procedures. The recurring threads are long wait times, difficulty reaching or being heard by court clerks, and a sense that some judges and commissioners approach cases with a tilt that leaves ordinary people feeling marginalized or overridden by procedures they feel are stacked against them.

A common thread centers on accessibility and communication. Reviewers complain about high call volumes and repeated hangs when they try to reach clerks or court staff by phone. Several describe being bounced around or refused access to supervisors, and they express that information they are legally entitled to obtain - about their own cases or about court processes - appears routinely withheld. The experience of calling or visiting the courthouse becomes stressful even before the matter at hand is addressed, as would-be litigants worry they won't be able to get basic guidance or timely responses. In some entries, the environment is described as unwelcoming or unhelpful, with staff who seem overwhelmed or inattentive, contributing to a broader sense of procedural bottlenecks rather than clear, citizen-centered service.

The small-claims process emerges as a flashpoint for debate about rules and fairness. Some reviewers ground their complaints in what they see as a misalignment between state rules and courtroom practice. They point to California's general position that small-claims hearings are designed to be simple, direct, and mostly attorney-free, and they state it should be the parties presenting their own cases to the judge, not lawyers. Yet a number of accounts allege that judges in these settings stray from that model by engaging with attorneys for large companies, or by allowing conversations between counsel and the judge in ways that other critics characterize as atypical for small-claims proceedings. These accounts give rise to questions of fairness and potential bias, with some reviewers asserting that attorney involvement influences outcomes in ways that disadvantage individual, non-attorney litigants.

Specific judges and court leaders are named in the discourse with strong, even scalding language. One reviewer singles out Judge Samra Furbush for alleged preferential treatment toward corporate defense counsel and for conducting discussions with attorneys during small-claims hearings, an arena where, according to the reviewer, attorneys should not be involved. Another account targets Judge Gregory and describes a calculation of civility that feels unequal, with the reviewer feeling dismissed or marginalized in the courtroom. Several posts are directed at Commissioner Belinda Handy, with attackers characterizing her as biased, racist, or out of step with the needs of ordinary people. They recount scenes of perceived hostility and a sense that the court's leadership is out of touch with the realities faced by non-privileged or under-resourced individuals, including older patrons and people of color. These claims are forceful and varied, spanning personal experiences of disrespect, perceived racial bias, and assertions of a systemic tilt toward wealthier or more powerful parties.

Beyond personnel, the physical and procedural environment of the courthouses also draws strong reactions. One review paints a picture of an aging, unclean building with neglected janitorial services, contributing to a sense that the place itself is not prepared to treat visitors with respect. By contrast, other reviewers note a more neutral or even positive ambience: some say staff members are courteous and patient, and that the court offers clear instructions or reasonable access points (including automated kiosks for fines). The inconsistency among these impressions - from words of praise to accusations of neglect and hostility - underscores a broader impression of a system that can be competent in some moments and deeply flawed in others.

The thread of case management and outcome is equally varied. Some patrons express disappointment that a supposed payback or remedy from the court did not materialize, or that the process dragged on with repeated delays. They describe scenarios where restraining orders, subpoenas, or evidence were not acted upon as they expected, leaving victims feeling unprotected or unheard. There are references to cases being transferred to distant courts, further complicating access and creating additional logistical and emotional strain. In other instances, the description reveals that the legal process delivered neither comfort nor resolution, with some reviewers feeling that the system failed to account for real-world harms, such as abuse, financial disputes, and safety concerns for family members.

Amidst the frustration, a smaller subset of reviews acknowledges positive elements. There are mentions of staff who were helpful, patient explanations that clarified doubts, and instances where someone - often a clerk or a single supportive employee - stepped in to guide a litigant through a particularly tangled moment. The presence of efficiency tools like a payment kiosk is noted as a practical improvement in some experiences, and a few patrons report courteous, responsive interactions that stand out against a backdrop of longer, more negative encounters. These threads of kindness and competence, though scattered, provide a counterpoint to the prevailing sense of bureaucratic strain.

In sum, the collected experiences describe a courthouse ecosystem that is at once essential and imperfect. Patrons repeatedly convey a desire for clearer information, more consistent and respectful communication, and processes that actually deliver timely relief or protection when needed. The most acutely felt concerns center on accessibility of staff, adherence to the proper small-claims framework, and the treatment of individuals who come to court with real-world stakes and limited resources. While there are moments of competent service and genuine courtesy, the prevailing tone across many reviews is one of frustration, with calls for accountability and reform echoing through every paragraph. If these patterns reflect broader trends, they suggest a need for systemic attention - improving accessibility, ensuring fair adherence to procedural rules, and fostering a courtroom culture that serves the public with dignity and efficiency.

This section of Moreno Valley, California offers a convenient and diverse range of amenities suitable for senior living. The neighborhood is home to several cafes such as Starbucks and The Coffee Bean and Tea Leaf, providing opportunities to socialize and enjoy a cup of coffee. Additionally, there are various parks nearby including Towngate Memorial Park and Sycamore Canyon Wilderness Park, perfect for outdoor relaxation and recreation. Residents will have access to multiple dining options like Carl's Jr., In-N-Out Burger, and Chick-Fil-A for convenient meal choices. Furthermore, there are reputable healthcare facilities in the vicinity such as Kaiser Moreno Valley and Riverside Medical Clinic, ensuring quality medical care when needed. The presence of pharmacies like Rite Aid and CVS Pharmacy also adds to the convenience of senior residents. Places of worship such as The Grove Community Church cater to spiritual needs while theaters like Regal Riverside Plaza offer entertainment options. Overall, this part of Moreno Valley provides a well-rounded community with essential services that would be appealing to seniors looking for a comfortable living environment.

Cafes

• Starbucks (0.7 miles)
• The Coffee Bean and Tea Leaf (1.2 miles)
• Starbucks (1.3 miles)
• Starbucks (3 miles)
• Starbucks (4.5 miles)
• Starbucks (7.7 miles)
• Stell Coffee & Tea Company (8.6 miles)

Parks

• Towngate Memorial Park (0.8 miles)
• Sycamore Canyon Wilderness Park (3.4 miles)
• Andulka Park (5.5 miles)
• Leonard Bailey Park (8.1 miles)
• Brookside Park (8.5 miles)
• Mount Rubidoux (8.6 miles)

Restaurants

• Carl's Jr. (0.8 miles)
• In-N-Out Burger (0.9 miles)
• Farmer Boys (0.9 miles)
• Portillo's Hot Dogs (1.2 miles)
• Wienerschnitzel (1.3 miles)
• McDonald's (1.4 miles)
• Chick-Fil-A (1.4 miles)

Physicians

• Kaiser Moreno Valley (0.9 miles)
• Moreno Valley Community Medical Group (0.9 miles)
• Nephrology Assoc Medical Group (1.1 miles)
• Healthcare Imaging Center at Day Street (1.2 miles)
• Riverside Medical Clinic (1.3 miles)
• Ahdoot Eli DO Riverside University Health System Orthopaedics (3.8 miles)
• Cardio Vascular Plus (4.2 miles)

Pharmacies

• Rite Aid (1.4 miles)
• Day Street Pharmacy (1.6 miles)
• Laguna Vista Pharmacy (1.9 miles)
• Walgreens (2 miles)
• Walgreens (2.1 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (2.1 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (3.8 miles)

Hospitals

• Riverside County Regional Medical Center (3.8 miles)
• Empire Imaging (7.9 miles)
• Riverside Center (8.2 miles)
• Jerry L Pettis Memorial (8.4 miles)
• Loma Linda Ambulatory Care Center (9.2 miles)

Places of Worship

• The Grove Community Church (3.8 miles)
• The Refuge Bible Fellowship (6.9 miles)
• Azure Hills Seventh-Day Adventist Church (7.8 miles)
• National Association of Seventh Day Adventist Dentists (8.4 miles)
• Riverside Community Church (8.9 miles)

Theaters

• Regal Riverside Plaza (7.8 miles)