1004 Nashport Street, La Verne, CA 91750
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
St. Matthew's Home For The Elderly Costs & Pricing
St. Matthew's Home for the Elderly offers competitive pricing for its residential options, particularly when compared to both Los Angeles County and the broader California market. For semi-private rooms, St. Matthew's charges $3,000 per month, which is notably lower than the county average of $3,349 and the state average of $3,333. Similarly, for private accommodations, St. Matthew's monthly fee of $3,500 stands in stark contrast to the higher costs of $4,197 in Los Angeles County and $3,939 statewide. These pricing structures underscore St. Matthew's commitment to providing affordable yet quality care for seniors within a competitive landscape.
| Floor plans | St. Matthew's Home For The Elderly | Los Angeles County | California |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $3,000 | $3,349 | $3,333 |
| Private | $3,500 | $4,197 | $3,939 |
Overall Review of St. Matthew's Home For The Elderly
Pros
The family feels fortunate to have found La Verne Manor.- The aunt loves her large private room and its value within her budget.
- Mike Tanada is amazingly helpful from the very beginning.
- He prepared the room promptly and provided dimensions in advance to aid furniture decisions.
- He communicates the residence policies professionally and is kind and compassionate to residents.
- He attentively ensures the residents' comfort and safety.
- He uses technology to keep the family informed and connected.
- He cheerfully goes the extra mile to accommodate out-of-town family members.
- He ensures mail and packages are delivered to the aunt's room and helps with paperwork.
- He makes sure she is ready on time for doctor’s appointments.
- He has modified routines to accommodate visitors and the aunt's unique needs.
- The staff provide excellent care to the aunt at La Verne Manor.
- Ample parking is available.
- The mother is doing very well and receives more attention and higher-quality care because she is one of six residents.
Cons
The reviewer is surprised that the care staff don’t seem to know the importance of washing the residents’ hands before meals.- The reviewer does not see many activities and feels that the listed activities are not being done.
Review
St. Matthew’s Home For The Elderly in La Verne is best suited for families seeking a small, intimate setting where an attentive, hands-on administrator and a close-knit care team can deliver highly personalized service. This community shines when a resident benefits from predictable routines, direct access to leadership, and a private room option that feels more like a home than a clinical setting. It is especially compelling for a resident who does not want to be lost in a large campus and who thrives on frequent, meaningful contact with staff and family, facilitated by a responsive, technology-enabled administrator.
Those considering alternatives should note that this option may not be the right fit for families prioritizing a robust daily activity calendar or expansive social programming. The reviews indicate a leaner schedule of activities, with some days showing less visible programming than expected. For families that value a bustling activity slate, formalized daily events, and a broader on-site spectrum of services, a larger community could better meet those demands. Additionally, if a top concern is consistently impeccable hygiene practices around meals and a highly structured staff training program, it may be prudent to compare other facilities whose operational routines are more visibly emphasized.
What makes the core positives meaningful is how they combine to offset the potential downsides. The administrator, supported by a responsive staff, acts as a daily point of trust: he prepares rooms in advance, communicates clearly about policies, and uses text, email, and photos to keep out-of-town families connected. This level of proactive communication translates into steady peace of mind for relatives who need to coordinate appointments, deliveries, and paperwork from afar. The ability to customize routines and accommodate visitors demonstrates a flexibility that is rare in larger communities, ensuring that a resident’s personality and needs are respected rather than constrained by standard routines. A large private room is a tangible perk that directly addresses comfort and dignity, which often translates into better mood and engagement.
At the same time, the noted gaps, chiefly around programming and some basic care habits, cannot be dismissed. Observers have mentioned that staff may not universally emphasize essential pre-meal hand hygiene, a gap that, while not indicative of neglect, raises legitimate questions about daily routines. The perception of limited activity options is reinforced by occasional observations that programming may not be consistently executed across all visit times. In a smaller setting, where every caregiver has a close relationship with residents, even small lapses can feel magnified, particularly for families accustomed to richer activity calendars or more regimented housekeeping practices found elsewhere.
Yet the compensating strengths tilt the balance toward a prudent choice for the right family. The intimate scale, often cited as “one of six” residents, facilitates more individualized attention, which many families equate with higher overall quality of care. The staff’s willingness to adapt to visitors and schedules, along with tangible touches like in-room mail and supply delivery, reduces friction for out-of-town families managing care details. The facility’s parking convenience and the ease of coordinating doctor’s appointments through a dedicated contact person are practical benefits that limit daily stress. When trust in leadership and consistent, visible care is the priority, these elements carry considerable weight.
For families moving forward, a targeted due-diligence plan makes sense. Schedule a visit to observe meal times and programming windows, and ask to see the activity calendar for a full week to gauge consistency. Confirm the latest room availability and clarify what a private room would include in terms furnishings, accessibility, and ongoing maintenance. Have a candid discussion with the administrator about care routines, hygiene practices, and how technology is used to share updates and photos. Finally, compare with another small, intimate option and a larger campus to ensure the chosen environment aligns with expectations for social engagement, care dynamics, and long-term affordability. This approach ensures a decision that balances comfort, personalization, and practical peace of mind.
6 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Board and Care Home
Activities on-site
Bath tubs
Cable or satellite TV
Devotional services off-site
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Indoor common areas
Move-in coordination
Outdoor common areas
Private
Private bathrooms
Respite or short term stays offered
Telephone
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Ontario International (12 miles away)
24-hour supervision
Ambulatory care
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Diabetic care
High acuity care
Incontinence care
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
Assisted Living Expenses and Long-Term Care Insurance: A Comprehensive Exploration
Securing Financial Support for Assisted Living: A Comprehensive Overview
Social Security Benefits and Assisted Living: Navigating Options Across the U.S.