1012 Nashport Street, La Verne, CA 91750
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
A Family Style Home Costs & Pricing
When evaluating the costs associated with a Family Style Home, both in Los Angeles County and across California, it becomes evident that these expenses reflect the broader housing market dynamics. For a Semi-Private room, residents can expect to pay approximately $3,500 per month within a Family Style Home, which is slightly above the county average of $3,349 but remains competitive compared to the state average of $3,333. Meanwhile, for those opting for a Private room, the monthly cost stands at $4,000 - this figure is notably lower than Los Angeles County's average of $4,197 yet higher than the statewide average of $3,939. These figures underscore not only the regional cost variances but also highlight the value offered by Family Style Homes in balancing affordability with quality living.
| Floor plans | A Family Style Home | Los Angeles County | California |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $3,500 | $3,349 | $3,333 |
| Private | $4,000 | $4,197 | $3,939 |
Assisted Living communities with a similar price nearby
-
from +$495 / mo
Cadence Brea
$3,995 to $5,500 / month15.5 miles away -
from +$500 / mo
Palomino Residential Care
$4,000 to $6,000 / month20.7 miles away -
from -$500 / mo
Tabi's Facility Home Care
$3,000 to $3,500 / month20.8 miles away -
About the same
Sam's Homecare
$3,500 to $5,500 / month15.4 miles away -
About the same
Genesis Manor VI
$3,600 to $4,200 / month10.7 miles away
Overall Review of A Family Style Home
Cons
The staff are totally unfamiliar with diabetes.- There is no nurse on site; their only training is first aid.
- The administrator/owner claimed to be a nurse and had no license.
- Joanna tried to lease mom’s house to convert it into an assisted living for $2,500 a month, which shows how conniving she is.
- He has Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s, and the care wasn’t helping him eat.
- The care was really bad; they didn’t address his Parkinson’s symptoms.
- They kept changing the pricing and taking advantage of his mom.
- When they removed him, they wouldn’t let the family take any of his medicine and even held it hostage.
Review
This community is best suited for seniors who want a true family‑style, home-adjacent living environment and whose care needs are relatively light, with family oversight available to handle day-to-day decisions. It may feel comfortable to those who prioritize a homey, intimate setting over the clinical feel of a larger campus, and who can supervise routine tasks and basic care themselves. It is not a fit for residents requiring steady medical management, frequent monitoring, or licensed nursing on site. Families should expect to fill the gap in oversight and to actively manage care plans, medications, and potential red flags if choosing this option.
Those considering alternatives should take a hard look at residents with chronic conditions or cognitive impairment. If diabetes management, Parkinson’s symptoms, or dementia care require professional, on-site expertise, this home will struggle to deliver consistently. Prospective residents needing regular nursing supervision, structured feeding programs, or clear, documented medical protocols should favor facilities with licensed staff, transparent care processes, and formal medical oversight. Additionally, where licensure and ethical practices are non-negotiable, this option should be crossed off the list.
The strongest potential upside lies in the appeal of a small, home-like setting that can feel less institutional and more personalized. For families who value daily, direct interaction with staff and a sense that care happens in a familiar space, this environment can offer comfort and familiarity. However, these perceived benefits are quickly undermined by the safety and care gaps evident in the record: a lack of on-site nursing, limited medical training among staff, and the potential for misrepresentation at the administrative level. In short, warmth and familiarity cannot compensate for medical negligence or mismanagement.
The most serious red flags center on medical supervision and trust. Reviews describe no licensed nurse on site, staff unfamiliar with essential conditions such as diabetes, and an administrator who claimed nursing credentials she did not hold. The care failures extend to feeding support for Parkinson’s patients and a troubling pattern of dynamic pricing that leaves families unsure what the actual monthly cost will be. Perhaps most concerning is a report of medicine being withheld during a transition out of the home, which underscores a dangerous lack of control over critical medications. These are not minor irritants but fundamental safety failures.
In weighing options, the pros and cons tilt decisively toward caution. The home-like atmosphere offers little protection against the core risks identified: medical oversights, potential caregiver gaps, and questionable administrative practices. Families evaluating this choice should demand verifiable licensure, on-site medical staff (preferably an RN/LPN), clear and stable pricing with written terms, and documented policies for medication management and emergency procedures. If these assurances cannot be provided, it is prudent to look at alternatives with established clinical oversight, transparent operations, and robust safety nets.
Ultimately, decisive action is warranted for families with residents who have diabetes, Parkinson’s, dementia, or any condition requiring predictable medical intervention. For those who can stay strictly within a low-care envelope and are prepared to conduct vigilant oversight, this option might still be worth a cautious look. Otherwise, prioritize facilities with licensed nursing on site, formal care plans, and reliable, ethics-forward administration. The goal is to secure a setting where medical safety, transparent pricing, and consistent care align, not a fragile arrangement that relies on heavy familial supervision to cover serious gaps.
6 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Board and Care Home
Activities off-site
Cable or satellite TV
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Indoor common areas
Move-in coordination
Outdoor common areas
Private
Private bathrooms
Respite or short term stays offered
Swimming pool / hot tub
Telephone
Wheelchair accessible showers
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Ontario International (12 miles away)
24-hour supervision
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Diabetic care
High acuity care
Incontinence care
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
Small, personalized care with attentive staff.
Comprehensive Supportive Living Arrangements for Adults with Disabilities
Funding and Affording Assisted Living: A Thorough Overview
Assisted Living Expenses and Long-Term Care Insurance: A Comprehensive Exploration