603 Tocino Drive, Duarte, CA 91010
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Mountain View Terrace Costs & Pricing
Mountain View Terrace offers competitive pricing compared to the broader market in Los Angeles County and across California. Monthly costs for a studio apartment at Mountain View Terrace stand at $3,095, significantly lower than the county average of $4,172 and the state average of $4,145. Similarly, their one-bedroom units are priced at $3,195, which is well below both Los Angeles County's average of $4,603 and California's average of $4,340. This positioning not only makes Mountain View Terrace an attractive option for prospective residents but also reflects a commitment to providing quality living at more accessible price points within the region.
| Floor plans | Mountain View Terrace | Los Angeles County | California |
|---|---|---|---|
| Studio | $3,095 | $4,172 | $4,145 |
| 1 Bedroom | $3,195 | $4,603 | $4,340 |
Overall Review of Mountain View Terrace
Cons
They claim it takes 10 years to get a senior living place after being on the list, which they find unbelievable.
The family reports their father is poorly treated, with him being written up for feeding squirrels and leaving doors open.
They say residents are written up for trivial things like bird feeding and plant placement.
They say key cards stop working and staff offer excuses, leaving the issue unresolved for months.
They say staff won't disclose information about incidents to the family, even when their relative is ill and in hospice.
They state there is no one to answer emergency buttons, undermining resident safety.
They allege a social worker entered their father's property and removed mail, which they view as a federal offense.
They would not recommend this place to anyone.
Review
Mountain View Terrace in Duarte is best suited for seniors who are largely self-sufficient and for families willing to navigate a care environment where staff accountability and communication are inconsistent. The community does not come across as a high-touch option; it reads as a setting where residents are expected to manage with minimal delegated support. Prospective residents with no ongoing medical needs and families comfortable with limited updates may endure, but those expecting reliable safety oversight, frequent check-ins, or proactive problem resolution will feel unsatisfied quickly. For an active senior who values independence but seeks minimal household interruption, it might feel tolerable, yet the cautions are unmistakable.
Those considering Mountain View Terrace should strongly weigh alternatives if a loved one is in or nearing hospice, has a history of falls, or requires prompt, clear communication after incidents. A claimed ten-year wait to obtain a place is not a comfort; it signals a pool of demand without corresponding guarantees of resident-focused service. Families prioritizing timely placement, transparency, and dependable caregiver responsiveness will likely reject this setting in favor of communities with obvious, accountable procedures and more robust incident handling.
On the surface, the lack of standout amenities might be viewed as a neutral backdrop, but the limited positives are far outweighed by the core failings. Emergency buttons exist, but reporting suggests they are not consistently answered or monitored, and 24/7 staff coverage appears inadequate. The environment comes across as rule-heavy rather than resident-centered, with a culture of enforcing restrictions rather than supporting daily living. The result is a climate where the sense of safety and dignity can feel compromised, eroding confidence in the facility’s ability to respond when it matters most.
The most troubling themes revolve around safety, privacy, and communication. A father recently had a stroke and was under hospice care, yet gate access was impaired for months with little satisfactory explanation. When emergencies arise, information about the resident’s status is difficult for families to obtain, raising serious concerns about transparency. Reports of a social worker allegedly entering personal space to handle mail and discard what was deemed junk are alarming, framed as potential privacy violations. Residents also describe being written up for seemingly trivial matters, feeding birds, placing a plant, or moving a cage, suggesting a punitive climate that drains dignity and trust.
Families evaluating this community should demand concrete, verifiable responses before committing. Essential questions include the actual staff-to-resident ratio across shifts, the speed and reliability of emergency call responses, and the policy for sharing health updates with family members. Inquiries should cover medication coordination when a resident is unavailable, and the safeguarding of mail and personal belongings. Tours should include conversations with multiple residents about daily life, and a careful review of how incidents are logged and followed up. Verify licensing status and request recent, specific testimonials rather than generic assurances, to avoid a mismatch between expectations and lived realities.
Bottom line: Mountain View Terrace presents serious red flags for most families seeking assisted living with dependable care, clear communication, and protective oversight. It may still be considered by those who can tolerate sparse staff presence, a restrictive daily routine, and a willingness to drive the care narrative rather than rely on facility leadership. For most families, pursuing alternatives, well-rated communities with transparent operations, strong incident management, and proactive family engagement, will yield safer, kinder, and more predictable outcomes for a loved one at all life stages.










Understanding the True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025: A Comprehensive Guide
Understanding Medicaid Coverage for Assisted Living: A Comprehensive Guide
How and When Medicaid May Cover Assisted Living Costs