1760 Bridgeport Avenue, Claremont, CA 91711
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
St. Daniel's Eldercare Costs & Pricing
St. Daniel's Eldercare offers competitive pricing for its accommodations compared to both Los Angeles County and the broader California
| Floor plans | St. Daniel's Eldercare | Los Angeles County | California |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $3,700 | $3,349 | $3,333 |
| Private | $4,700 | $4,197 | $3,939 |
Memory care communities with a similar price nearby
Overall Review of St. Daniel's Eldercare
Pros
The home is spacious, measuring 3,800 square feet.
It has two live-in caregivers.
The atmosphere is homey, with a warm and friendly feel.
The staff is very warm and receptive to prospective residents and their families.
They provide options for consideration and ask appropriate questions to ensure proper care and companionship for loved ones.
Cons
The place is run down.
The clients lack caregivers that walk with them in the community to keep them safe.
The owner is rarely present and is very rude.
The front yard has trash in it most of the time.
The parking lot is run down.
It needs state oversight to ensure the clients are cared for appropriately.
They are advised to make surprise visits at different times during the day and night to ensure their loved ones are safe and cared for.
Review
St. Daniel's Eldercare in Claremont is best suited for families seeking a deeply intimate, homeâlike setting where daily life centers on a small caregiving team. The residence is a 3,800âsquareâfoot house staffed by two liveâin caregivers who deliver handsâon companionship and daily support. The atmosphere reads as warm and receptive, with staff willing to discuss care options at length and tailor arrangements to the residentâs needs. For families prioritizing a homelike routine and a sense of familiarity, this community offers a comforting, less institutional option that can feel like a living room with constant, attentive presence.
Where to steer away: those who require consistent administrative oversight, robust clinical care, or 24/7 nursing will want alternatives. Multiple notes point to limited onâsite leadership: the owner is rarely present and has been described as rude by some families. Such dynamics raise questions about continuity of accountability and response when concerns arise. The property itself shows signs of wear, trash in the front yard and a runâdown parking area, that can undermine comfort and signal uneven maintenance. If safety oversight by outside regulators is a priority, this setting may require proactive, unscheduled visits to confirm quality of care.
Yet the upside cannot be dismissed. The two liveâin caregivers create a notably intimate support network that can adapt to routines, preferences, and the residentâs pacing. The homey layout and small footprint foster a sense of community that larger facilities struggle to match. Families report staff are warm, welcoming, and engaged in identifying care options that fit the personâs needs, with questions designed to assure companionship and suitability. These strengths can offset the absence of more formal clinical staffing by offering consistent, individualized engagement and a safe, atâhome environment.
That said, the main cons carry real weight. The environmentâs condition is not merely cosmetic; it reflects a willingness to invest in upkeep and safety. The perception of owner disengagement can erode trust in governance and responsiveness, which matters when urgent issues surface. Groundâlevel deficiencies, like debris in the yard or a neglected parking lot, also raise concerns about overall risk management. If any resident has mobility challenges or requires rapid assistance, the questions become: who answers, how quickly, and what support is available when caregivers are not immediately present in common areas?
Practical testing during visits becomes essential. Prospective families should observe caregiver interactions with current residents, note whether staff bridge time with meaningful activities, and confirm how emergencies are handled given the limited staff. Inquire about the schedule and responsiveness of the owner or administrator, and request a transparent outline of who oversees safety, medications, and daily routines. Verify the presence of contingency plans, respite options, and any available external oversight to reassure that the care will remain consistent even when personal staff are offâduty. Prepare to schedule surprise checkâins as a prudent measure.
Bottom line: St. Daniel's Eldercare serves best for those seeking a deeply homeâcentered experience, one that offers sincere warmth, a compact community, and direct access to two caregivers who know the resident well. It can be an excellent fit for families prioritizing companionship and tailored daily life, provided the resident does not require sustained, highâlevel clinical oversight. For anyone who needs robust governance, strong 24/7 nursing, or a facilityâwide commitment to ongoing maintenance, alternatives with larger staff and more formal structures should be pursued. A thoughtful tour, a frank discussion of governance, and a plan for regular, unscheduled visits will determine whether this quiet, intimate setting matches the loved oneâs care priorities.



























Memory Care Pathways: A Holistic Guide to Dementia Support
Comprehending Evening Confusion in Dementia: Causes, Manifestations, and Support
Delirium and Dementia: Unraveling the Key Differences


