4189 Lexington Avenue, Chino, CA 91710
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Ranch Country Home Costs & Pricing
At Ranch Country Home, the monthly costs for accommodations range competitively when compared to both San Bernardino County and the state of California as a whole. For private rooms, residents can expect to pay between $3,500 and $4,606, which aligns closely with county rates but offers slightly higher flexibility in pricing. Semi-private rooms are available from $3,500 to $3,839, again reflecting a competitive stance against the county's average of $2,958 but providing greater options for those seeking shared living situations. The studio units stand out at a fixed rate of $4,990, notably above both local and state averages; however, this reflects the exclusive features and services associated with these spaces. Overall, Ranch Country Home presents a pricing structure that appeals to diverse needs while maintaining a commitment to quality care and comfort.
| Floor plans | Ranch Country Home | San Bernardino County | California |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $3,500 to $3,839 | $2,958 | $3,333 |
| Private | $3,500 to $4,606 | $3,561 | $3,939 |
| Studio | $4,990 | $3,455 | $4,145 |
Assisted Living communities with a similar price nearby
-
from +$495 / mo
Cadence Brea
$3,995 to $5,500 / month13.2 miles away -
About the same
Loving Home Care
$3,500 to $4,500 / month24.8 miles away -
from +$500 / mo
Palomino Residential Care
$4,000 to $6,000 / month24.1 miles away -
from -$500 / mo
Tabi's Facility Home Care
$3,000 to $3,500 / month19.1 miles away -
About the same
Sam's Homecare
$3,500 to $5,500 / month10.9 miles away
Overall Review of Ranch Country Home
Pros
The place is clean.- Melorse was very nice.
- The facility has only six beds, which makes it feel intimate.
- The home setting is beautiful.
Cons
The reviewer wouldn’t even give it a star.- The reviewer says the place sucks.
- The staff argued with the reviewer every time a simple request was made.
- The staff agreed to do tasks only verbally.
- The staff did not provide 24/7 care as agreed.
- During visits, workers were observed chatting, watching soap operas, or playing games on their phones.
- It was described as very inconsiderate, uncooperative, and unprofessional.
- It was not a good fit.
- There were no activities at the 3 pm site visit.
- The layout was awkward, requiring passing through a two-bed guest room to reach the ladies’ bathroom.
- There was black mold in the ladies’ shower.
- It had a beautiful home setting, but it was not right for their needs.
Review
Ranch Country Home in Chino, CA is best suited for seniors who want a very small, home-like setting and can tolerate active family oversight to ensure consistent care. The community’s six-bed footprint makes it appropriate for residents who need light to moderate assistance and who benefit from a quiet, intimate environment. It is not a fit for those requiring around-the-clock professional monitoring, complex medical management, or specialized memory care. For families that prefer hands-on coordination and frequent check-ins, this setting can feel workable. For anyone relying on predictable, structured care with professional staff present at all hours, alternative options are a clearer match.
Those considering alternatives should note several red flags that hinder this community’s suitability. First, the rebranding to Banner Ridge Home Care raises questions about continuity and oversight, a concern when stability matters for ongoing care. The most troubling patterns in the reviews point to staff who argue with families, fail to follow through on commitments, and appear inattentive during visits. Verbal assurances without consistent documentation or action undermine trust and make reliable daily care hard to guarantee. Additionally, the lack of visible, purposeful activity programming and an awkward facility layout raise doubts about safety, engagement, and ease of use for everyday routines.
On the positive side, cleanliness and the appeal of a small, homelike setting stand out as tangible advantages. A six-bed environment can offer stronger familiarity with caregivers and residents, potentially reducing confusion and promoting a calmer atmosphere. A staff member named Melorse was highlighted as genuinely nice, suggesting that a portion of the team can deliver compassionate, personalized care within the constraints of the operation. The aesthetic charm of a well-kept home can ease transitions for families and residents who prioritize comfort and privacy over formal programming. Yet these strengths are fragile if foundational reliability falters.
The core deficiencies, unreliable staffing, inconsistent care, and visible safety concerns, tale the decisive tale. The claim that care is not provided 24/7 as promised is more than a nuisance; it represents a clear risk for residents who need assistance at night or during off-peak hours. The awkward layout, requiring passage through a guest room to reach a bathroom, raises privacy, safety, and accessibility issues that can impede daily living and emergency responsiveness. Black mold in the shower is a nonnegotiable safety hazard that cannot be rationalized as a minor flaw. When combined with a lack of activities and engagement, these factors overwhelm any aesthetic appeal or small-scale intimacy.
To move forward, families should demand concrete proof before any commitment. Insist on meeting with a supervising caregiver or administrator, obtain a current, written care plan, and review staffing schedules to confirm 24/7 coverage. Request a guided tour focused on accessibility, safety features, and the condition of all communal and private spaces. Obtain the latest licensing inspection results and any open or past complaints, and talk with current families about their experiences over time. If the facility cannot demonstrate stable staffing, a consistently clean and mold-free environment, and meaningful daily engagement, it is prudent to continue the search.
In sum, Ranch Country Home is unlikely to satisfy families seeking dependable, comprehensive care for most seniors. It may serve a narrowly defined niche, families who can and will actively supervise a tiny, home-like setting and tolerate variable staffing, yet the prominent safety and reliability concerns make it a poor default choice. For most, exploring other local communities with transparent staffing, robust activities, and proven safety records is the wiser path. When a decision is made to look closer, pursue explicit expectations, verify improvements, and reassess promptly after a placement to ensure the resident’s needs are truly being met.
6 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Board and Care Home
Activities on-site
Cable or satellite TV
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Indoor common areas
Move-in coordination
Outdoor common areas
Private
Swimming pool / hot tub
Telephone
Wheelchair accessible showers
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Ontario International (7 miles away)
24-hour supervision
Ambulatory care
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Diabetic care
Incontinence care
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
Comprehensive Insights into Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and Their Assessment
Medicare Coverage for Assisted Living: An In-Depth Exploration
Choosing the Right Senior Care: A Detailed Exploration of Assisted Living and Nursing Homes