5328 East Anderson Drive, Scottsdale, AZ 85254
For more information about senior living options: (844) 490-3973
What level of care are you interested in?

Assisted Living

Memory Care

Independent Living

Skilled Nursing Facility

Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC)CCRC

Other
A resident who has lived in this home for two years describes a largely positive experience with the overall quality of care, noting that the care they have received has been commendable in many respects. The opening sentiment emphasizes satisfaction with the level of attention, responsiveness, and professional standards observed over the course of the stay. This sense of approval provides a foundation for a nuanced perspective that balances praise with specific, pointed concerns about what the reviewer perceives as gaps or mismatches in care needs and facility policies.
Alongside the general appreciation, the account flags a strong sense that the home functions best when it serves particular types of residents. The reviewer suggests that the facility excels with paralyzed, non-demand, bedridden clients or with independent, less-needy residents who do not require intensive oversight. By contrast, the account raises reservations about admitting Alzheimer's patients or others who are confused, require a strict bathroom schedule, or need ongoing assistance with medications. The implication is that the home may lack the capacity to deliver the level of individualized attention that these more complex needs demand, and that such admissions could stretch staff time and resources in ways that affect overall care quality.
A salient thread throughout the account concerns staffing dynamics and the daily realities of resident care. The reviewer contends that there are serious concerns about whether staff can consistently provide the time and attention required for residents with cognitive impairment or behavioral needs. The language used suggests a perception that staff may be spread thin or unable to dedicate the necessary time to each resident, particularly those who require routine assistance or structured medication management. The account conveys a sense that the care environment may not always align with the expectations of families for thorough, proactive engagement with residents who have more complex medical or cognitive needs.
The narrative also touches on troubling incidents related to caregiving practices and staff conduct. In particular, the reviewer references an episode described as involving a day-off behavior by a caregiver, characterized by sleeping in public spaces such as a bus or a mall. Alongside this, there is a claim about the withholding of medications from a resident's husband when he refused them. These details are presented as part of a broader pattern of concern about reliability, accountability, and the consistency of medication administration, all of which the reviewer believes could compromise safety and well-being. Even though the account does not provide exhaustive corroboration, it anchors a sense of unease about how medication and daily routines are managed and monitored.
Another set of concerns centers on staff accommodations and the broader implications of housing practices for caregivers. The reviewer notes a lack of designated sleeping or resting spaces for staff members who come from other countries, describing a situation in which caring staff function in a servitude role rather than a clearly defined, supported professional environment. The impression conveyed is that staffing logistics - such as where staff rest, how shifts are organized, and how staff welfare is safeguarded - may not be optimal, potentially affecting morale, retention, and the consistency of care delivered to residents.
Financial matters are described as a significant point of contention in the reviewer's experience. The account asserts that deposits and ongoing care fees were retained even though the resident had been in the facility for only a short period - three months in this case. This element of the narrative underscores a tension between the perceived value of the services received and the financial commitments demanded by the home. The combination of a relatively brief stay, an ensuing hospitalization, and questions about whether medication management, routine scheduling (including bathroom routines), and engagement in meaningful activities could have helped prevent hospital admission all contribute to a sense of dissatisfaction with the financial and administrative practices of the facility.
In addition to these concerns, the reviewer notes that there were opportunities for improvement in terms of activities and daily structure. The account suggests that a more predictable routine, with a clearly defined bathroom schedule, improved medication adherence and overall wellness, and that engagement in activities aligned with the resident's interests could have contributed to better health outcomes and possibly prevented the hospitalization that occurred during the stay. This emphasis on routine, meaningful engagement, and person-centered programming reflects a belief that non-pharmacological supports are central to quality aging care and that such supports should be integral to the care plan for any resident.
The person behind these observations identifies themselves with professional credentials - Kate Monroe, RN, MSN, PMH-NP - adding a dimension of professional accountability to the account. The inclusion of these credentials signals an insistence on professional standards in the discussion of care quality, medication management, and the ethical considerations surrounding staff practices and resident welfare. The author's perspective blends lived experience with an expectation that clinical expertise and nursing leadership should inform both daily care and the governance of facility policies.
Taken together, the account presents a portrait of a care home that is capable of delivering solid quality care in many contexts but that also reveals notable areas of concern. There is praise for the overall care quality in many respects, paired with strong warnings about the suitability of the facility for residents with dementia or multiple complex needs, questions about how medications are managed, and criticisms of staffing practices and financial policies. The narrative underscores the importance of clear admission guidelines for cognitively impaired residents, robust medication administration procedures, transparent financial practices, and attentive, well-supported staffing that can dedicate the necessary time to each resident's individualized needs.
For families and residents evaluating this home, the account highlights critical considerations beyond surface-level impressions of competence and kindness. Key issues to scrutinize include dementia care capacity, the availability of dedicated caregiving resources for cognitively complex residents, the transparency and fairness of deposit and ongoing fees, the facility's policies around medication administration, and the welfare and working conditions of staff who are responsible for delivering daily care. Addressing these areas could significantly impact both the quality of life for residents and the overall sustainability of high-quality care within the home.
Adagio House II in Scottsdale, AZ is a warm and inviting assisted living community that provides personalized care in a home-like setting. Residents will find comfort and peace of mind knowing that their needs are taken care of by our dedicated staff.
Our facility offers various types of care, including board and care home services as well as respite care for those who may need temporary assistance. Each resident is provided with a fully furnished room to make them feel right at home. Our spacious dining room allows residents to enjoy delicious meals together, while accommodating any special dietary restrictions they may have.
At Adagio House II, we understand the importance of maintaining an active and engaging lifestyle. That's why we offer scheduled daily activities to keep residents entertained and stimulated. From group exercises to arts and crafts, there is something for everyone to enjoy.
We prioritize the health and well-being of our residents by providing assistance with activities of daily living such as bathing, dressing, and transfers. Our staff also coordinates with healthcare providers to ensure that each resident's medical needs are met. Medication management is available to ensure medications are taken accurately and on time.
Our community is conveniently located near various amenities including cafes, parks, pharmacies, physicians' offices, restaurants, transportation options, places of worship, theaters, and hospitals. Transportation arrangements can be made for medical appointments for added convenience.
Adagio House II strives to create a comfortable and nurturing environment where residents can thrive both physically and emotionally. With our exceptional care services, amenities such as Wi-Fi/high-speed internet access throughout the facility, beautiful outdoor spaces, housekeeping services, move-in coordination support, residents can truly embrace a worry-free lifestyle in Scottsdale.
Adagio House II is located at 5328 East Anderson Drive, Scottsdale, AZ 85254 in Maricopa County, Arizona
Endeavor AL II
Scottsdale, AZ
Accessible care with medication management and wheelchair-friendly showers; strong access to nearby amenities and services.
Endeavor AL II costs
Endeavor AL II reviews
Endeavor AL II images
A & I Adult Care Home II
Scottsdale, AZ
Specialized high-acuity and diabetic care with medication management.
A & I Adult Care Home II costs
A & I Adult Care Home II reviews
A & I Adult Care Home II images
Life Care Center Of Paradise Valley
Phoenix, AZ
Some staff show genuine care and responsiveness, with positive experiences on certain floors.
Life Care Center Of Paradise Valley reviews
Life Care Center Of Paradise Valley images
Brookdale Desert Ridge
Phoenix, AZ
Friendly staff, clean facility, and engaging activities.
Brookdale Desert Ridge costs
Brookdale Desert Ridge reviews
Brookdale Desert Ridge images
The Manor Village at Desert Ridge
Phoenix, AZ
Warm, welcoming atmosphere with friendly staff and engaging activities.
The Manor Village at Desert Ridge costs
The Manor Village at Desert Ridge reviews
The Manor Village at Desert Ridge images
Comprehensive Residential Support and Assisted Living Solutions for Individuals with Disabilities
The article examines the complexities of assisted living for individuals with disabilities, emphasizing the need for tailored care solutions that enhance quality of life and social inclusion, while addressing financial challenges and advocating for community integration. It discusses various housing options, the importance of financial assistance through public benefits, and highlights trends towards integrated and technology-driven solutions in disability-focused housing.
Comprehensive Supportive Living Arrangements for Adults with Disabilities
Assisted living for adults with disabilities has transformed to provide personalized care and support services aimed at improving residents' quality of life while balancing independence and assistance. However, low-income individuals often face challenges in affording these services, requiring navigation of various financial resources and advocacy for better policies and solutions.
Funding and Affording Assisted Living: A Thorough Overview
Assisted living facilities provide support for older adults needing help with daily activities without extensive medical care, but their costs can be high and vary by location and services offered. Families often seek various funding options and financial strategies to manage these expenses effectively while considering future needs and potential price increases.