AAA Warman Home Care

Pros

• They are the best live-in care home for all.
• They take care of all people with love and care.
• They go above and beyond.
• They ease the stress for families.
• They treat residents like family.
• They are available to support clients anytime of day or night.
• The staff is wonderful.
• The owner is very hands-on.

Cons

• The establishment is very unprofessional and does not pay its workers.
• They are scammers who issue checks that are returned by the bank.
• The reviewer has not been paid since July.
• The owner, Mrs Cheril Shoemaker, is dishonest with her workers.
• Checks are bouncing and workers are being fined.
• Anyone should avoid using this place until the owner starts treating workers properly.

Review

Two very different voices converge on one care facility, painting a picture that is at once warm and alarming. On one hand, a glowing testimonial elevates this establishment as "the best live-in care home for all," a place where every individual is treated with "love and care" and where staff "go above and beyond." This reviewer emphasizes the sense of security and relief that comes from a staff that feels like family, with a hands-on owner who takes the job seriously and a team that remains supportive around the clock. The portrayal suggests a tight-knit community where clients are cherished and families are offered reassurance, especially during times of broader financial and social stress. The reviewer also highlights affordability, noting that the prices are "wonderful" given the current crisis, and expresses a strong willingness to recommend the home to any family seeking care for a loved one. In short, this account frames the facility as a beacon of warmth, attentiveness, and accessibility, where compassion is as much a selling point as the services themselves.

The praise continues with vivid testimony about the daily experience: staff who are described as "wonderful," a leadership dynamic in which the owner remains intimately involved, and an environment that feels less like a service provider and more like a family unit. The reviewer notes that the care is available "anytime of day or night," which adds to the sense of constant reliability and attentiveness. The language used conveys trust - claims that the team treats residents as if they were their own family - and culminates in a strong recommendation that a family's stress be lifted by entrusting a loved one to this care home. The overall tone is one of gratitude and confidence, suggesting that for this reviewer the facility lives up to its promises with warmth, consistency, and a customer-centric approach that makes families feel seen and supported.

In striking contrast, another account arrives with sharp, accusatory language that casts serious doubt on the facility's professional standing and financial integrity. This reviewer contends that the establishment is "very unprofessional" and accuses it of not paying its workers, labeling the operation "a bunch of scammers" who issue checks that are subsequently returned by banks. The grievance is particular and personal: the reviewer claims not to have been paid since July despite being described as an "excellent worker" who has helped care for people who risk their lives. The allegations are tied to the owner's name, Mrs. Cheril Shoemaker, with a direct call for honesty in dealings with employees and a demand that outstanding bills be settled. The language grows increasingly pointed as the reviewer describes bounced checks and fines, and urges potential workers and clients to avoid the facility until those payroll and financial practices are reformed.

That second review centers on a problematic dynamic between leadership and staff, portraying a widening gap between promises of care and the realities faced by workers who rely on timely compensation. The author stresses the emotional and financial strain of unresolved payroll issues, suggesting a pattern rather than a one-off incident. The language underscores a loss of trust: when checks bounce and wages go unpaid, the reviewer suggests a chilling effect on morale and a sense that the owners prioritize their own financial position over the well-being of their employees. The plea is stark and urgent - pay staff what is owed and restore credibility - below which the reviewer worries about the broader implications for residents who depend on a stable, ethical operation.

Taken together, the two reviews present a facility in a moment of poignant tension. The first account reads like an endorsement of a warm, family-style caregiving atmosphere, praising not only the quality of day-to-day attention but also the stability and accessibility that come with dedicated ownership and an affordable price point during tough times. The second account, however, throws a wrench into that image by raising serious concerns about labor practices and financial management. The contrast invites a careful, nuanced interpretation: even in places where compassionate care can feel abundant, organizational breakdowns or perceived mismanagement can undermine trust and safety for staff and residents alike. It highlights how a care home is judged not solely by the tenderness of its care, but also by the reliability and integrity of its administration.

For families considering this facility, the reviews together suggest a path of due diligence. If you are drawn to the warmth and familial culture described in the glowing testimonial, it would be prudent to corroborate with direct conversations: speak with current residents and their relatives about day-to-day experiences, request a tour of live-in spaces, and ask about how emergencies are handled overnight. If the payroll concerns raised by the second reviewer loom large in your evaluation, you should also request transparent documentation about wage schedules, payment history, and the process for addressing payroll disputes. In any case, verify consistently across sources, including any references or inspections, and consider both the emotional climate described by residents and the practical assurances that keep care workers motivated and able to provide steady, high-quality care. Ultimately, the decision hinges on finding a balance between a nurturing daily environment and a governance structure that ensures fair treatment of staff and financial reliability for families.

Restaurants

• Boondocks Patio & Grill (0.9 miles)
• Shake Shack (1 miles)
• Culinary Dropout (1.1 miles)
• McDonald's (1.1 miles)
• McDonald's (1.1 miles)
• Toca Madera Scottsdale (1.2 miles)
• Francine (1.2 miles)

Physicians

• One Medical (1 miles)
• Scottsdale Cardiovascular Center (1.9 miles)
• Azam Medical Clinic (3.4 miles)
• Null (4.7 miles)
• Valley Sleep Center - Scottsdale Center (4.7 miles)
• Advanced Fertility Care (5 miles)
• Medical Plaza 1 (5.1 miles)

Pharmacies

• Walgreens (1.2 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (1.3 miles)
• Walgreens (1.7 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (2.1 miles)
• Walgreens (3.1 miles)
• Walgreens (3.5 miles)
• Walgreens (4.5 miles)

Hospitals

• Greenbaum Surgery Center (1.7 miles)
• Piper Surgery Center (5.2 miles)

Cafes

• Starbucks (1.7 miles)
• Dutch Bros Coffee (2.9 miles)
• Dutch Bros Coffee (4.2 miles)
• Bikini Beans Espresso (4.6 miles)
• Starbucks (5.3 miles)
• Provision Coffee Bar (5.8 miles)
• Dutch Bros Coffee (6.1 miles)

Places of Worship

• Salt River Assembly of God (4.2 miles)
• Christ Church of the Ascension (5 miles)
• Shepherd of the Desert Lutheran Church (5.5 miles)
• Islamic Community Center of Tempe (6.1 miles)

Theaters

• Harkins Tempe Marketplace 16 (5.3 miles)

Parks

• Tempe Beach Park (5.8 miles)

Transportation

• METRO University Dr /Rural (6.2 miles)