401 South 400 East, Bountiful, UT 84010
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
South Davis Community Care Center Costs & Pricing
At South Davis Community Care Center, the monthly cost for a private room is $6,000, which significantly exceeds both the county and state averages. In Davis County, the average cost for a private room is approximately $3,665, while across Utah, it stands at around $3,782. This disparity highlights South Davis Community Care Center's positioning in the market; it may offer enhanced services or amenities that justify the higher price point. Prospective residents and their families should carefully consider these costs in relation to the level of care and quality of life offered at this facility compared to other options within the region.
| Floor plans | South Davis Community Care Center | Davis County | Utah |
|---|---|---|---|
| Private | $6,000 | $3,665 | $3,782 |
Overall Review of South Davis Community Care Center
Pros
The facility has improved over the past few years.
The nursing staff takes their jobs seriously and ensures that residentsâ health is of the utmost importance.
The residents interact well with each other.
It has a great atmosphere and a close-knit residential community.
Many of the residents have lived there for quite some time.
Cons
The bed setting was too high, causing the mom to fall and break her arm.
The family did not receive timely updates about changes in her condition.
The care was awful.
The staff fail greatly at their jobs.
The CNAs would not change the resident's briefs when needed, and the husband had to prompt them.
The resident waited 15-20 minutes after pressing the call light, sometimes hours.
There were several times the call light was not working.
Review
South Davis Community Care Center in Bountiful is best suited for seniors who want a neighborly, smallâcommunity feel and for families prepared to stay actively involved in care. The setting can deliver a sense of residence and friendship among residents, and it may work for those who donât demand elite medical oversight or highly responsive safety systems. It is not the right choice for families seeking consistently proactive safety management, transparent communication, or medical precision on a dayâtoâday basis.
What stands out most from the reviews is a pattern of safety and communication gaps that overshadow any perceived warmth. One family entrusted their loved one after surgery and found the bed too high, resulting in a fall that caused a broken arm, with no timely notification to the family afterward. Another family describes repeated failures to change a residentâs brief, extended delays in answering call lights, and even noncompliance with doctor orders. These incidents suggest a troubling vulnerability in routine safety protocols and a fragile mechanism for keeping families informed when concerns arise.
The third review paints a more balanced picture: a facility that has improved over time, with many residents who have long tenures, and nursing staff that reportedly works long hours under heavy pressure. The reviewers acknowledge that the environment can feel restrictive or austere, âone step above being in prisonâ, yet they also point to a genuine, if overtaxed, commitment to health and to a closeâknit community among residents. The core tension is clear: the atmosphere and the human connections are real, but they are offset by systemic strains that impede reliable, highâquality care when it matters most.
Taken together, the pros of this community live in social fabric and perceived seriousness about health. The strong point is the persistent, if overburdened, nursing presence and the ability for residents to form meaningful connections with peers. This can translate into frequent dayâtoâday interaction and a sense of belonging, which is meaningful for some families and residents. However, the cons, unreliable call responses, inconsistent adherence to medical directives, and notable safety lapses, threaten the core purpose of a longâterm care setting: dependable, safe, medically appropriate care delivered with transparent accountability.
For families considering this facility, a practical, disciplined dueâdiligence approach is vital. Ask for direct conversations with the administrator and the head of nursing to review how falls are prevented and how postâsurgical care is coordinated. Request a current staffing snapshot, including CNAs per shift and turnover rates, and observe a live callâlight response during a tour. Probe the facilityâs incident reporting and family communication processes to confirm that changes in a residentâs condition are promptly shared. Verify the bed configurations and fallâprevention measures throughout patient rooms, and insist on a clear plan if a resident needs to be moved between buildings again, without notification, if that ever crops up again.
Ultimately, this community is not a catalytic match for families whose top priority is rockâsolid safety, immediate responsiveness, and scrupulous adherence to medical orders. It may still bear consideration for those who value a personable, residentâdriven atmosphere and are able to maintain an active, handsâon oversight role, accepting that staffing pressures can dampen overall performance. If choosing to pursue this option, enter with guarded expectations and insist on concrete assurances: documented care plans, defined escalation paths, and measurable improvements in safety and communications. For those needing consistently reliable care and clear, rapid response to concerns, explore other facilities with stronger staffing models and proven safety cultures.










A Closer Look at Private Pay Home Care
Comprehensive Approaches for Arthritis: A Detailed Guide to Symptoms, Causes, and Care
Comprehensive Insights and Practical Strategies to Help Older Adults Avoid Falls